![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
|
|
#11 | |
|
Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Alibi: ego ipse hinc extermino
Posts: 12,591
|
Quote:
Oolon |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Snyder,Texas,USA
Posts: 4,411
|
Game, set, and match for Oolon!!!!!!! <img src="graemlins/notworthy.gif" border="0" alt="[Not Worthy]" />
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Springfield, Missouri
Posts: 77
|
What's ICR publications? I wasn't even thinking but I guess it wasn't as original of an idea as I thought. I was actually coming up with it in jest.
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Springfield, Missouri
Posts: 77
|
Ok well how about this idea? Suppose you have a neuronic systems that can produce radio waves in specific patterns that could be read by organisms with these same neuronic systems and (seemingly telepathic) communication could be a result of such acts? I am not trying to justify telepathy occuring in human beings right now but could that be evolutionarily possible? I don't suppose that idea is original either? Can organic matter to even give off radio waves? I think it can, can't it?
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Springfield, Missouri
Posts: 77
|
Some form of electromagnetic radiation can induce electric potentials in neurons, right?
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Greensboro, NC, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,597
|
Quote:
Creation Research Duane Gish, Henry & John Morris, et al. Creation "Science" at its best (which is to say, a veritable waste reclamation center of academia). Bill |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Springfield, Missouri
Posts: 77
|
ah, lol
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: US and UK
Posts: 846
|
Quote:
(Scepticism about some evolutionary arguments doesn't make me a creationist, incidentally. Most fields of science are beset with faulty conclusions.) Fermi's paradox suggests to me that intelligence is not a high probability outcome of evolution. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
|
Circular arguments are the bugbear of evolution.
(Scepticism about some evolutionary arguments doesn't make me a creationist, incidentally. No, but misunderstanding them makes you look pretty silly. Most fields of science are beset with faulty conclusions.) I'm glad you told us this. I am sure we'll all be more careful in the future. Fermi's paradox suggests to me that intelligence is not a high probability outcome of evolution. In a universe with trillions of stars, even a low probability is going to have millions of examples. Vorkosigan |
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,162
|
NOVA Online has a 2001 interview with Stephen Jay Gould <a href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/gould.html" target="_blank">here</a>.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|