FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-05-2003, 07:11 AM   #71
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 1,490
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Peter Kirby
Haran, if we could find the article, and if we could find someone fluent in Dutch and English (or pay a professional), we would still have to obtain copyright permission in order to distribute a translation. Lots of hurdles there.
I suppose. It seems that snippets might be ok via fair-use laws, though... Perhaps the footnotes would be of use. I'll have to see if I can find one of them.

Quote:
Jacob Neusner is a great scholar who hates his former teacher with a vengeance.
So, you're speculating that this "great scholar" had a "hatred" of his former teacher that led him to possibly slander Smith for vengeful purposes (what are they?) ? And you think I have a "whipped-cream pie"??
Haran is offline  
Old 07-05-2003, 07:13 AM   #72
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 927
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Haran
Hmm... Does anyone know Dutch? It'd be great if there was someone who could find and translate this. I'm not sure if I could find either of these journals in the libraries here, but I might check.

Me, me
demoninho is offline  
Old 07-05-2003, 07:13 AM   #73
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Haran
After reading Quesnell, this list of experts didn't seem to mean much. Apparently Smith was rather vague about the role of those scholars. Re-read section III. Further Questions for Smith question number 3, How much of the text of CA was actually seen by the many scholars named as readers? , p. 64 of Quesnell's first article.
Red herring. Yuri refers to the scholars who examined the palaeography of the text, for whom the photographs would be the primary data. Reaching a palaeographical decision shouldn't depend in any way on the commentary that Morton Smith wrote in the chapters of his book; indeed, that could even be considered a distraction.

best,
Peter Kirby
Peter Kirby is online now   Edit/Delete Message
Old 07-05-2003, 07:21 AM   #74
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Haran
I suppose. It seems that snippets might be ok via fair-use laws, though... Perhaps the footnotes would be of use. I'll have to see if I can find one of them.
If you do find the article, it wouldn't hurt to attempt to contact the author and the journal, preferrably in that order.

Quote:
Originally posted by Haran
So, you're speculating that this "great scholar" had a "hatred" of his former teacher that led him to possibly slander Smith for vengeful purposes (what are they?) ? And you think I have a "whipped-cream pie"??
It's pretty clear from his writing that Neusner is a great scholar and has an animus against Smith. This would be true regardless of whether the Mar Saba fragment is authentic and regardless of whether Neusner had evidence for forgery.

best,
Peter Kirby
Peter Kirby is online now   Edit/Delete Message
Old 07-05-2003, 07:24 AM   #75
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
Default

Vinnie -- I am not ignoring you, but I didn't want to hijack this thread. We'll talk soon.

Vorkosigan
Vorkosigan is offline  
Old 07-05-2003, 07:25 AM   #76
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 1,490
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Peter Kirby
Red herring. Yuri refers to the scholars who examined the palaeography of the text, for whom the photographs would be the primary data. Reaching a palaeographical decision shouldn't depend in any way on the commentary that Morton Smith wrote in the chapters of his book; indeed, that could even be considered a distraction.
Ooops. I think you're right. The section dealing with Smith's vagueness on the paleography is section I. B.
Haran is offline  
Old 07-05-2003, 07:30 AM   #77
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 1,490
Default

Quote:
Peter Kirby
If you do find the article, it wouldn't hurt to attempt to contact the author and the journal, preferrably in that order.
You're right, although the journal may contact the author for you, which is the case for my posting of the CBQ article.

Unless the person who spoke up and knows Dutch wants to obtain all the permissions, translate the article, and post it on the web (which is probably too much to ask), then the point is probably moot. It would be an interesting read though. Too bad it's not in English as well.
Haran is offline  
Old 07-05-2003, 07:36 AM   #78
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Haran
You're right, although the journal may contact the author for you, which is the case for my posting of the CBQ article.

Unless the person who spoke up and knows Dutch wants to obtain all the permissions, translate the article, and post it on the web (which is probably too much to ask), then the point is probably moot. It would be an interesting read though. Too bad it's not in English as well.
Not moot at all. First of all, I volunteer to convert it to HTML and place it on the web. That's easy. Your mission, if you choose to accept it, is to locate the article in a library or by interlibrary loan, contact the journal for copyright permissions, and scan the article into images. You then zip up the images and electronically send them to the Dutch-English translator. You get back the English translation in some form, and pass it off to me for publishing on the web.

So, this could happen.

best,
Peter Kirby
Peter Kirby is online now   Edit/Delete Message
Old 07-05-2003, 07:42 AM   #79
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 1,490
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Peter Kirby
Not moot at all. First of all, I volunteer to convert it to HTML and place it on the web. That's easy. Your mission, if you choose to accept it, is to locate the article in a library or by interlibrary loan, contact the journal for copyright permissions, and scan the article into images. You then zip up the images and electronically send them to the Dutch-English translator. You get back the English translation in some form, and pass it off to me for publishing on the web.

So, this could happen.
Ok. Well, let me see if I can find either of the journals then. The libraries have many specialized and foreign ones, but I'm not sure they'll have these. I'll get back to you on this.
Haran is offline  
Old 07-05-2003, 07:47 AM   #80
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 1,490
Default

For those interested in who Edward Hobbs is (the scholar who talks at length about Smith and SGM as a forgery in the link IM posted), he has served as President of the Society of Biblical Literature (SBL) among other things:

Edward C. Hobbs

I think more good scholars doubt the authenticity of SGM than some want to believe. I think that Vinnie's recent reading of Koester may have influenced him toward authenticity (since, according to Hobbs, Koester was always a "fan" of Smith's).
Haran is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:19 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.