Spenser

Magus55, you sound like a spoiled child who refuses to have it any other way than your own. Every point you brought up has been countered, after which you shied away from it.

Where did all the basic laws of nature come from? Perhaps you should consider taking a physics course to better understand what the laws of nature are before assuming something must dictate them; fore you are creating a supposed thing that is more complex than the laws it supposedly ascribes, goes outside of what would be considered nature, which leaves it subject to what laws must it follow and what created it and how can we know anything about it if it cannot be observed? You have given us your answer to everything which seems to be a great mystery you got from an old book written by nothing more than men.

Now that every one has reiterated the fact that more accurate dating methods were used to place the skulls between 154,000 to 160,000 years ago, what happened to your argument? Can you never concede that in some instances you were wrong?

Mageth

The problem is that Magus can't concede that his literal interpretation of the Bible is wrong. Therefore, any evidence, hypotheses, or theories that contradict it must be wrong. Any 'ole lame explanation as to why they are wrong will do.

Hedwig

Yes...and Padme Amidala works for the senate.

Understand: there is nothing presiding over the Universe as far as I can tell. And if a god, a senate, or a group of underpants gnomes designed it, it was a botch job at best.