FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-01-2002, 10:32 AM   #41
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 333
Talking

got messed up and posted twice.

[ April 01, 2002: Message edited by: snatchbalance ]</p>
snatchbalance is offline  
Old 04-01-2002, 11:14 AM   #42
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: US
Posts: 5,495
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by snatchbalance:
<strong>1. We do form abstractions indepently, but thier validly, or the only way that we can know if they're valid or not, is by the confirmation of others.

A concept requires that it can be shared, and it requires that it be accepted by others. Or, you have no way of knowing if it matches external reality or not.
</strong>
Snatch:

I still think an individual can develop a concept and test its validity experimentally against reality. All this without sharing or acceptance with/by others.

Proof, however, is another thing and this is required for "acceptance" by others. Proof is a social convention giving a concept a "seal of approval". I'm sure someone will disagree but I consider proof through the use of propositional logic or scientific investigation proofs by social convention.

Cheers!
John Page is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:02 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.