FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB General Discussion Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 02:40 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-11-2003, 10:17 AM   #41
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: the peach state ga I am a metaphysical naturalist
Posts: 2,869
Default

zar said
Not a peep of "It's not fair" is heard when we kill thousands of innocents and fuck around with other people's countries.

first please prove that we the us kill thousands of innocents. and collateral damage is not proof. in war collateral damage happens on both sides. then, i ask you when do we fuck with other people's countries? the usa acts in its best interests as all countries should. if we exercise our political power, then good. the world should be happy that generally we do not choose to exercise our military power. as i have said before and will say again. compared to any other world power or empire at any time in the history of the world, america comes out ahead when it comes to being conservative in the use of its power. arguing that america shouldnt protect her own interests makes no sense. ethical egotism for governments.
beyelzu is offline  
Old 01-11-2003, 10:20 AM   #42
Contributor
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,686
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Beyelzu
interestingly to note, historically black colleges receive on average around 70% of there operatiing expenses from federal grants.
Black and female colleges should be closed except for ones that are funded privately in its entirety. They do promote racism and sexism, but black racism is never or very rarely acknowledged (as is female sexism).

When Morris Brown in Atlanta lost its acreditation a mother of a student said that that she wanted a college where her child was "tought by blacks and interacted with black administrators". If a white person said something like that they would be called a klaner, but it seems to be perfectly acceptable for blacks ...

UMoC
Derec is offline  
Old 01-11-2003, 10:26 AM   #43
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: the peach state ga I am a metaphysical naturalist
Posts: 2,869
Default

uglymanoncampus,

sometimes i am amazed what blacks can get away with.

but i think that we should hold these colleges to the same standards that we hold others. you know they should have quotas reflecting population and have affirmative action to bring qualified white applicants in.
beyelzu is offline  
Old 01-11-2003, 10:30 AM   #44
Contributor
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,686
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Beyelzu
uglymanoncampus,

sometimes i am amazed what blacks can get away with.

but i think that we should hold these colleges to the same standards that we hold others. you know they should have quotas reflecting population and have affirmative action to bring qualified white applicants in.
What I mean is, that since these schools practice racial discrimination their federal and other public funding should be revoked much like Bob Jones' University federal funding was revoked (I don;t agree with their policy neither)

Or imagine a "historically white college" such as UGA discriminating against blacks in admissions.

UMoC
Derec is offline  
Old 01-11-2003, 10:37 AM   #45
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Buggered if I know
Posts: 12,410
Talking

Quote:
Originally posted by Beyelzu
....
the usa acts in its best interests as all countries should. if we exercise our political power, then good. the world should be happy that generally we do not choose to exercise our military power. .....
You seriously mean we ignorant benighted heathen foreigners should be grateful that the USA simply doesn't bomb the shit out of us every time a Prez has re-election problems, or has a trade dispute with the EU ?



{ loud raspberry noises self-censored out of this post }
Gurdur is offline  
Old 01-11-2003, 10:40 AM   #46
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Buggered if I know
Posts: 12,410
Thumbs down

Quote:
Originally posted by UglyManOnCampus

Black and female colleges should be closed except for ones that are funded privately in its entirety. They do promote racism and sexism, but black racism is never or very rarely acknowledged (as is female sexism).
...
Your claim is unsubstantiated, as per sexism especially.

There has been solid, confirmed research to show that female students aged 15 to 18 do better in mathematics, physics and chemistry when in all-female classes.

Your take on this ? Hopefully non-rhetorical.
Gurdur is offline  
Old 01-11-2003, 11:19 AM   #47
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: the peach state ga I am a metaphysical naturalist
Posts: 2,869
Default

gurdur, i am pointing out that the us generally shows restraint. and zar acts like we just go around killing people for no reason. i dont think we should just go out and kill everybody. but we should act in our own best interest.

also, studies also show that males do better in all male learning environments.

i think all colleges should entirely omit the question of race from all applications. let the chips fall where they may. if they have no information on race then there can be no racial bias.
beyelzu is offline  
Old 01-11-2003, 11:48 AM   #48
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: The Vine
Posts: 12,950
Default

Quote:
but we should act in our own best interest.
Is this really a basis for foreign policy? If our goal is just to do whats in our best interest how does that make us different from any other country (or even Nazi Germany for that matter?)

also, do we use our military a lot? can you name another country that even comes close to the amount of money, arms and forces we have used in coups, assasinations, crushing of revolts etc...?
August Spies is offline  
Old 01-11-2003, 12:42 PM   #49
Obsessed Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Not Mayaned
Posts: 96,752
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Feather
Back the doublethink truck up here.

A corporation is a separate entity from the shareholders. It has legal standing and liability in a way that protects the shareholders should somebody bring a lawsuit up against the coporation. That is, in fact, the whole point of setting up a corporation: so that the personal wealth and freedom of the shareholders is protected from punitive action.

Dividends are more like wages paid out to the shareholders than merely a distribution of the coporation's profits.

It's not double taxation, in other words. The "person" of the corporation has "his" "income" (profits) taxed and then the persons the corporation "pays" (via dividends) have their incomes taxed. Separately.
Flawed argument.

Money the corporation pays out as wages to it's employees is *NOT* taxed at the corporate level, only at the individual level. However, dividends are taxed *BOTH* at the corporate and individual level.
Loren Pechtel is offline  
Old 01-12-2003, 03:32 AM   #50
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Lincoln, NE, United States
Posts: 160
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by UglyManOnCampus

That is because "payroll tax" is not really a tax at all but more like an insurance premiums for services such as, as you said, Social Security and Medicare....
Quote:
Originally posted by MortalWombat

So if it's not really a tax at all, then paying it is voluntary, right?
Quote:
Originally posted by UglyManOnCampus

Activity fee at my university is not a tax either but it is not voluntary either.
Quote:
Originally posted by August Spies

this is stupid. Univesrities and other non-Govermental things do not TAX they have Fees. Goverments tax. They are forced out of the citizens. You choose to go to what university you go to, those fees are basically jsut a part of your tuition.

Then I jumped in and pointed out how the idea of choice was an illusion, and that the use of �forced into it� was equally ridiculous. It likened it to saying your parents forced you into existence, or you are forced to stay alive.

Quote:
Originally posted by 99Percent

There is a big difference between the word "tax" and the word "fee".
No there isn�t. Besides not wanting to get into semantics, a tax is very much like a fee because you pay for something. UglyManOnCampus likened taxes to an insurance premium, which you have to pay for. Then MortalWombat objected, suggesting that the analogy wasn�t fair, because you don�t have a �choice� about it. So, UglyMan retorted, supplying an example of a fee which you don�t have a choice in. AugustSpies then chimed in, saying that he really did have a choice about the fee, because he could choose what university you go to, and that the fees are just part of the tuition. My objection was - some things in life, we really don�t have a choice in, like school (example I provided), or healthcare (like UglyMan provided).

Quote:
Originally posted by 99Percent

Taxes are obligatory as August Spies pointed. Fees are not. � but in the end everyone is paying by force because its a tax you cannot escape from.
Oh contraire, you can escape anything and everything, if you so desire. Just because you don�t like your choices, doesn�t mean you don�t have any.

Quote:
Originally posted by 99Percent

But I think its worthwhile to understand the difference.
Yeah, I know there is a difference. It would be easier if we were talking about recreational fees, where you pay a fee for a particular gym, spa, ski resort, or movie. Educational fees are not really voluntary, just like health care fees and taxes. The choices you have are between responsibility to our society, and not being a part of our society (hiding, dieing, moving away ect.)�and I think its important to understand the similarities UglyMan first brought up, and I agreed with.
managalar is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:59 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.