FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-20-2003, 03:50 PM   #51
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 1,626
Default

Hi Infinity
do you think everyone has faith in something to some degree?

Hi Helen
I guess I just tend to use the terms interchangably. yaiks.

Thanks Goliath it seems to be a very thin line between the two.
Amie is offline  
Old 01-20-2003, 03:56 PM   #52
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fargo, ND, USA
Posts: 1,849
Default

Amie,

Quote:

Thanks Goliath it seems to be a very thin line between the two.
A thin line to be sure, but an unbelievably important one.

Sincerely,

Goliath
Goliath is offline  
Old 01-21-2003, 12:29 AM   #53
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: http://10.0.0.2/
Posts: 6,623
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Amie
do you think everyone has faith in something to some degree?
No. Religious Faith is choosing to believe something because it suits you and the refusal to validate that believe against external phenomena. This should be contrasted with induction, whereby people "suck it and see" based on past experience.

For example, it's not faith that leads me to assume the sun will rise in the morning, it's pure and simply the fact that for 4 billion iterations previously it has done, nothing has changed since yesterday, therefore it will today. Inductive logic is a vital component of our cognitive ability to model the world effectively. Without it we could not function.

People are able to ignore their mind's insistence that it knows the future (because it reckons it knows the past) for short periods of time. That ain't faith, though, that's open-mindedness. Faith is held by the narrowest of narrow minds because it denies the possibility of its own falsehood, ergo blocking real learning and personal growth.
Oxymoron is offline  
Old 01-21-2003, 12:45 AM   #54
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: the peach state ga I am a metaphysical naturalist
Posts: 2,869
Default

so maybe the big difference is atheist know truth and theists know The Truth tm. The Truth tm only comes from faith.
beyelzu is offline  
Old 01-21-2003, 05:39 AM   #55
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: southeast
Posts: 2,526
Cool supporting evidence

Quote:
Originally posted by Amie
do you think everyone has faith in something to some degree?
Faith is simply belief without supporting evidence.

Personally, I try to rid myself of faith at every chance. I do this by looking at the evidence, and trying not to be deceived by my desires.
Asha'man is offline  
Old 01-21-2003, 01:41 PM   #56
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Northeastern U.S.
Posts: 797
Default Re: Believing in God

Quote:
Originally posted by Amie
Hello everyone

I have a question for the atheists here and I thought you may be able to help me understand this.

I believe in God based on my faith. I know that atheists tend to not believe because you have no reasons to and because there is no evidence to support a God belief.
Got me thinking. What would you require to have a God belief? I am thinking it would be a subjective experience for you. However this leads to my next question.

I was recently told that in order to fully answer the question of "what would you require to have a God belief", one would have to be able to define God in order to have that belief. however wouldn't one have to define God in some way to *not* believe?
It seems to me in order to *not* believe in God it must take some level of definition and understanding of what it is you *don't* believe in otherwise your position would be neutral (not a belief, not a non belief)

Am I way off base here?

Thank you for taking the time to answer me, I appreciate it.
I need some coffee

Amie~
I do define the god(s) which I believe don't exist: I lump them all into a category I call 'supernatural gods;' that is, entities capable of transcending the physical laws under which the universe operates. I'm also pretty sure that Greek, Roman or Norse gods are non-existent. That's a shame, though, because they sound like a lot more fun.

Richard
rdalin is offline  
Old 01-21-2003, 03:32 PM   #57
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 1,626
Default

Well Oxymoron I completely disagree with you on this statement you made and I think it is rather unfortunate that you think people who have faith have the narrowest of narrow minds:
Quote:
Faith is held by the narrowest of narrow minds because it denies the possibility of its own falsehood, ergo blocking real learning and personal growth.
Having faith in something does not mean that you are unwilling to learn if things turn out differently.
Amie is offline  
Old 01-21-2003, 03:35 PM   #58
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: the peach state ga I am a metaphysical naturalist
Posts: 2,869
Default

i am sorry amie,


but quite often having faith means just that. certainly not all the time. but again quite often faith leads to dogma. and dogma can be incredibly resistant to change, regardless of any evidence to the contrary.








edited cuz i really cant spell.
beyelzu is offline  
Old 01-21-2003, 03:37 PM   #59
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 1,626
Default Re: supporting evidence

Quote:
Originally posted by Asha'man
Faith is simply belief without supporting evidence.

Personally, I try to rid myself of faith at every chance. I do this by looking at the evidence, and trying not to be deceived by my desires.
Hi Asha'man
Is there anything in your life that you believe without having evidence?
Have you ever said to anyone "I have faith in you"?
much love~
Amie
Amie is offline  
Old 01-21-2003, 03:40 PM   #60
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 1,626
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Beyelzu
i am sorry amie,
but quite often having faith means just that. certainly not all the time. but again quite often faith leads to dogma. and dogma can be incredibly resistant to change, regardless of any evidence to the contrary.
Beyelzu I agree with you on this point. Can you believe it?
oh and I kant spel either...my posts are riddled with spelling and grammatical errors. you are in good company.
Amie is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:36 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.