Fred Flintstonensis

Radorth says:
Wrong Radorth, obviously since you are dishonest, you think automatically think that everyone is just as dishonest as you. I changed it because it was wrong not because you pointed it out. It was a misstatement. I witnessed my wife make just that sort of misstatement this very morning, on a subject that she knew well, almost to the point of being an expert. I wrote that post after working a 60 hour week and just after recuperating from a 3 week illness. Had I carefully read what I had written, I would have not posted until I modified it as per the modified statement that I subsequently posted.

I did not stretch the truth at all, I made a misstatement. I am frankly shocked that it has been a point of discussion this long. In fact, you should be ashamed of yourself for keeping this issue alive as long as you have and for consistently attempting to hold me to a misstatement by which I have already refused to stand.

Radorth says:
No problem, Radorth, I said it in my post dated 20 DEC 2002 in this thread, some two days before you said that you missed it. I am actually not going to make too big of a deal about this oversight on your part since everyone here knows that you do not carefully read our posts.

Here is what I said:

Radorth

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA!!!!

Sure Fred. You just happen to change it after I alone pointed it out.

All the skeptics here believe you.

My, my, my. You are a holy thing, aren't you?

Rad

Radorth

That came long after I pointed out the fallacy in your arguments, as well, and questions like "who should we believe?"

To "believe" means to have a firm opinion. I obviously helped you change it.

Rad