FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-17-2002, 09:49 AM   #281
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: I've left FRDB for good, due to new WI&P policy
Posts: 12,048
Thumbs down

Quote:
Originally posted by RJS (defining the eternal absense of god, i.e. Hell):
<strong>It would be eternal life on Earth, without the possiblity of dying and without any of the blessings God has bestowed upon the earth - mostly emanating from the existence of Love. Populate the earth with 20 billion of the most depressed nihilists you can think of and then make them exist forever - and then remove every single ounce of brotherly love. That is my belief, which is what you asked for.</strong>
Are you saying that only god can make people experience love, that no one experiences love of their own accord?

This description of Hell brings up many, many questions. Will people living on Earth (Hell) at those post-judgment times be able to continue scientific investigations? Can we build spaceships and go to other planets, maybe terraform Mars? Will we be able to form governments and enact laws, collect taxes? Will we each have to hold down a job, or does immortality obsolete food, clothing, and shelter? I imagine living as a member of a race of 20 billion immortal, indestructable beings with a lot of free time on their hands and no inclination to become religious to be The Very Definition of Heaven on Earth.

But you will no doubt offer some attempt at an explanation for how these 20 billion persons will be prevented from doing any of this, or anything else I'd call productive, all the while insisting that god is still absent from this world.

Oh, but I remember: love and hence all things good come only from god. RJS, this leads to the conclusion that people have no free will, but do good only at god's bidding, or at best in ignorant mimicry of god, like a trained pet. There are many reasons to object to this view, it's repugnancy not the least of them. Can you explain how your beliefs avoid this dismal conclusion?
Autonemesis is offline  
Old 05-17-2002, 09:51 AM   #282
RJS
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Tampa
Posts: 303
Post

Quote:
RJS, do you believe that God loves the damned?
yes
RJS is offline  
Old 05-17-2002, 10:03 AM   #283
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: somewhere in the known Universe
Posts: 6,993
Post

Then why the need for Hell, especially if he forgives all?

B
brighid is offline  
Old 05-17-2002, 10:06 AM   #284
RJS
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Tampa
Posts: 303
Post

Quote:
This description of Hell brings up many, many questions. Will people living on Earth (Hell) at those post-judgment times be able to continue scientific investigations? Can we build spaceships and go to other planets, maybe terraform Mars? Will we be able to form governments and enact laws, collect taxes? Will we each have to hold down a job, or does immortality obsolete food, clothing, and shelter? I imagine living as a member of a race of 20 billion immortal, indestructable beings with a lot of free time on their hands and no inclination to become religious to be The Very Definition of Heaven on Earth.

But you will no doubt offer some attempt at an explanation for how these 20 billion persons will be prevented from doing any of this, or anything else I'd call productive, all the while insisting that god is still absent from this world.
All I know is that you will be tormented by such existence. What may sound good now, might not then.
RJS is offline  
Old 05-17-2002, 10:07 AM   #285
RJS
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Tampa
Posts: 303
Post

Quote:
Then why the need for Hell, especially if he forgives all?
Lets see - maybe for those that dont ask for forgiveness and repent.
RJS is offline  
Old 05-17-2002, 10:13 AM   #286
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: somewhere in the known Universe
Posts: 6,993
Post

But if he is a loving and perfect God why does one need to ask for forgiveness? Especially if His gift is FREE? But hey – you still haven’t gotten around to answering most of the other questions I have posted here? So, are you going to tackle those, or just answer the easy questions you already have cookie cutter responses to?
brighid is offline  
Old 05-17-2002, 10:18 AM   #287
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 4,140
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by RJS:
<strong>Lets see - maybe for those that dont ask for forgiveness and repent.</strong>
We're talking eternal damnation here, aren't we? But what about those who ask for forgiveness and repent after death and damnation? Since you say that God loves the damned, why would God withhold from them the possibility of repentance, forgiveness, and relief from suffering? Sorry, I just don't get it.

[ May 17, 2002: Message edited by: MrDarwin ]</p>
MrDarwin is offline  
Old 05-17-2002, 10:28 AM   #288
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Post

RJS:

Back on page 7 I posted:

When someone gets terminal cancer or a horrible disease like Ebola, it's hardly comparable to a vaccination.

The child needed the shot; otherwise much worse things could happen to them. You, unlike god, are not supposed to be omniscient and omnipotent, and thus you don't know and can't create a less painful alternative to the vaccination.

I hear xians talking about how pain and suffering are used by god to do this or that. God is supposed to be omniscient and omnipotent, and omnibenevolent as well. Thus he should be able to come up with an alternative to pain and suffering to accomplish his goals. Since he hasn't, he either can't or won't, and thus he's one of not omnibenevolent, not omniscient, or not omnipotent, or a combination thereof.


You replied:

I would use the term analagous, not comparable. Think about it from the 3-year olds perspective and the parent's too.

Fine, but how can you make an analogy without comparing?

From <a href="http://poets.notredame.ac.jp/cgi-bin/wn?cmd=wn&word=analogy" target="_blank">here:</a>

analogy (sense 2) -- (drawing a comparison in order to show a similarity in some respect

comparison, comparing -- (examining resemblances or differences)


And I notice you didn't actually respond to the point of my post. Note that I would add the fact that you are presumably benevolent to your daughter, so if there was a way to avoid the most suffering (actually contracting a disease the shot is meant to inoculate against) without inflicting the pain of the shot, you would use it.
Mageth is offline  
Old 05-17-2002, 11:04 AM   #289
RJS
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Tampa
Posts: 303
Post

Quote:
But hey – you still haven’t gotten around to answering most of the other questions I have posted here? So, are you going to tackle those, or just answer the easy questions you already have cookie cutter responses to?
I gotta tell you, I dont remember which question I have not answered. I know I have posted over 100 times in 48 hours. I have likely received multiple hundreds of questions. If there is one or two pressing questions you have for me, please reiterate them and I promise to tell you what I think. And I will likely even engage in follow-up dialogue with you (provided we keep a decent tone.)
RJS is offline  
Old 05-17-2002, 11:08 AM   #290
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: somewhere in the known Universe
Posts: 6,993
Post

I haven’t posted all that much in here – specifically go back to the first few pages and reread my posts.

Brighid
brighid is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:50 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.