FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-29-2003, 08:48 AM   #41
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,199
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by eh
What strawman? Using Santa to explain EM is no more silly than invoking magical Gods to explain other forces.
Maybe you'll understand when you're older.
yguy is offline  
Old 04-29-2003, 08:50 AM   #42
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 2,214
Default

What are some examples illustrating God's influence in natural events? And before answering that, which god(s)?
Abacus is offline  
Old 04-29-2003, 09:14 AM   #43
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,199
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Abacus
What are some examples illustrating God's influence in natural events? And before answering that, which god(s)?
There is only one God. The name you hang on Him is irrelevant to this discussion.

As for God's influence in natural events, I've suggested in my "probability and science" thread that He is the cause of random particle motion such as that of electrons, since the only other explanation yet offered is that nothing is the cause of such motion. Don't ask for proof, because I don't have it any more than do those who say such motion is uncaused.
yguy is offline  
Old 04-29-2003, 09:28 AM   #44
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 2,214
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by yguy
There is only one God. The name you hang on Him is irrelevant to this discussion.
How do you know this? Why only one?

Quote:
As for God's influence in natural events, I've suggested in my "probability and science" thread that He is the cause of random particle motion such as that of electrons, since the only other explanation yet offered is that nothing is the cause of such motion. Don't ask for proof, because I don't have it any more than do those who say such motion is uncaused.
Why do you think particles have to have such a presumably complex cause for their motion such as God? And how do you know God is a he?
Abacus is offline  
Old 04-29-2003, 10:49 AM   #45
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Hiding from Julian ;)
Posts: 5,368
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by yguy
There is only one God. The name you hang on Him is irrelevant to this discussion.

As for God's influence in natural events, I've suggested in my "probability and science" thread that He is the cause of random particle motion such as that of electrons, since the only other explanation yet offered is that nothing is the cause of such motion. Don't ask for proof, because I don't have it any more than do those who say such motion is uncaused.
And when science figures that one out, what will you do then? Cry foul, admit that your god just possibly might NOT have been directly effecting those events, or shove him back one stage further? Claiming your god causes quantum fluctuations in the absence of other evidence is no more enlightened than saying god causes lightning in the absence of other evidence - what makes you different from those 'religious bigots' you say that science has succeeded in rebuffing? There will ALWAYS be a pigeonhole of unknownness to shove god into because there will always be something we don't know, and god as a concept is infinitely redefineable.
Corona688 is offline  
Old 04-29-2003, 11:03 AM   #46
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Louisville, KY, USA
Posts: 1,840
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by yguy
Maybe you'll understand when you're older.
Understand what? That there is no more evidence for Yahweh controlling particle motion than for invisible Santa beings controllign particle motion? That's already obvious -- no need for advanced age to figure that one out.

Or did you mean to say, maybe one day you'll be older and more aware of you're impending death, and therefore more willing to believe silly things as long as they assuage the fear? That may be true. I see that process happening all the time.

Patrick
ps418 is offline  
Old 04-29-2003, 03:32 PM   #47
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,199
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Abacus
How do you know this? Why only one?
If there were more than one, you would have competing wills trying to run the universe by committee at best.

Quote:
Why do you think particles have to have such a presumably complex cause for their motion such as God?
What makes more sense to you, a "complex" cause, or none at all?

Quote:
And how do you know God is a he?
That's a discussion for another forum.
yguy is offline  
Old 04-29-2003, 03:43 PM   #48
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,199
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Corona688
And when science figures that one out,
I'm not holding my breath.

Quote:
what will you do then? Cry foul, admit that your god just possibly might NOT have been directly effecting those events, or shove him back one stage further?
Will you cry foul when I put the pictures I have of you beating your wife on my website?

Quote:
Claiming your god causes quantum fluctuations in the absence of other evidence is no more enlightened than saying god causes lightning in the absence of other evidence
I agree. We don't know what causes lightning either. We lots more ABOUT lightning, and we know that it's a form of static electricity, but from what I've read the mechanism is still not well understood.

Quote:
- what makes you different from those 'religious bigots' you say that science has succeeded in rebuffing?
What makes me similar?

Quote:
There will ALWAYS be a pigeonhole of unknownness to shove god into because there will always be something we don't know, and god as a concept is infinitely redefineable.
God as a concept is irrelevant, and God as a reality cannot be defined, because to define is to limit.
yguy is offline  
Old 04-29-2003, 03:53 PM   #49
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 1,126
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by yguy
There is only one God.
Evidence, please.
Kimpatsu is offline  
Old 04-29-2003, 03:53 PM   #50
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 2,214
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by yguy
What makes more sense to you, a "complex" cause, or none at all?
Why postulate a cause when there is no evidence for one?
Abacus is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:59 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.