Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
04-08-2003, 06:17 AM | #11 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 64
|
Come on madmavman45, everyone knows that sin isn't the cause of environmental destruction by humans. OBVIOUSLY, its water. Everyone who has ever destroyed part of the environment has had water at least once or twice in their lives. Clearly we should all band together and rid ourselves of this horrible substance.
~ToM |
04-08-2003, 06:33 AM | #12 |
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: With 10,000 lakes who needs a coast?
Posts: 10,762
|
The very idea that the earth is only our temporary home is dangerous. The fact is the earth is humanity's only home. Even if we make it to the stars someday it's unlikely we will find or even build a planet as hospitable to us as this one is. If we want to ensure our survival as a species we need to protect the global ecosystem we live in.
|
04-08-2003, 08:26 AM | #13 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Roanoke, VA, USA
Posts: 2,646
|
Quote:
NPM |
|
04-08-2003, 10:50 AM | #14 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
|
Quote:
|
|
04-08-2003, 10:56 AM | #15 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Easton, PA
Posts: 5
|
brilliant idea about the water thing. those people also seem to breath air! and they need to consume food on a regular basis to surivive! maybe if we get rid of air and food as well, everything will be all okay.. lol.. well, now you've got me curious? why is it that humans are destructive to their environments? why is it that we cannot truly act without leaving a mark? and everyone is "harming" the environment (although the world seems to do a rather good job of emasculating itself, as a single volcano produces more pollution than we do in years.. and earthquakes, and cows....) something we need to go crazy over? i guess if you're placing all your hope and trust in this world, then, i could understand why you'd be anxious, etc. silly and unfounded, but i can understand.
there really is nothing different between someone who has environmentalism as their religion (and it most DEFINATLY qualifies as one for some people) and someone who is quite bent on destroying everything for his own personal gain. i'm not a touchy-feely let's-all-just-get-along person, but this is certainly an issue where moderation and wisdom need to take precedence. either extreme is quite dangerous. |
04-08-2003, 12:54 PM | #16 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: With 10,000 lakes who needs a coast?
Posts: 10,762
|
Quote:
No evidence exists of humans living anywhere else. No evidence exists that humans ever lived somewhere else. On the contrary, there is overwhelming evidence that we have always lived here and are descended from other animals that live here. No evidence exists of human consciousness continuing beyond death. |
|
04-08-2003, 01:02 PM | #17 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: With 10,000 lakes who needs a coast?
Posts: 10,762
|
Quote:
Quote:
I see your point. Certainly if we're going to live here we're going to have an impact. But I think it is worthwhile to minimize that impact. Species go extinct naturally; I don't think it's a good idea from a practical or a moral standpoint to increase the extinction rate. The extreme environmentalists you cite exist, but they are a small minority of the people who are concerned about the planet. |
||
04-08-2003, 03:27 PM | #18 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Eastern U.S.
Posts: 1,230
|
Quote:
The problem is, it's false. Cheers, Michael |
|
04-08-2003, 03:41 PM | #19 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
|
Quote:
And lack of evidence also isn't proof. |
|
04-08-2003, 03:48 PM | #20 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,921
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|