Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
05-31-2002, 07:53 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ecuador
Posts: 738
|
Oolon:
[ May 31, 2002: Message edited by: Morpho ]</p> |
05-31-2002, 07:55 AM | #12 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 5,815
|
Kent? Eric? He uses two names?
|
05-31-2002, 08:04 AM | #13 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 105
|
Quote:
|
|
05-31-2002, 08:05 AM | #14 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: WI
Posts: 4,357
|
Quote:
|
|
05-31-2002, 08:18 AM | #15 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: WI
Posts: 4,357
|
Check that. Misbegotten.
|
05-31-2002, 08:23 AM | #16 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Posts: 17,432
|
Quote:
so the nut doesn't fall far from the tree. |
|
05-31-2002, 08:28 AM | #17 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Proud Citizen of Freedonia
Posts: 42,473
|
Quote:
But more importantly, I've got Red Bedford Shale. Where we are currently doing some work, there is a hill. At the bottom of the hill is the red beford shale (some the crappiest rock you'll ever see). As you go up the hill, the red bedford follows you, however, at one point, the red bedford is underlying gray bedford shale. Go further up the hill and Berea sandstone overlays all the shale. A little further up, you get into the Sunbury shale on top of it all. The point is this. I'd like a reasonable explanation as to why the red bedford shale, which is not capped by the berea sandstone at the bottom of the hill is much much more weathered than the red beford shale that is atop the hill. Neither is exposed at the surface. And to think it is 4500 years of weathering is just silly. Of course, I'd be scolded at for lying as to the depths of the rock I brought in. |
|
05-31-2002, 08:30 AM | #18 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Proud Citizen of Freedonia
Posts: 42,473
|
Quote:
|
|
05-31-2002, 08:45 AM | #19 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Just another hick from the sticks.
Posts: 1,108
|
Ah yes, Kent begat Eric and Eric begat....whodahell ever.
the problem you'd be facing, Jimmy, is that Hovind would simply shout you down and the audience would hang on his every, dulcet word. These guys litterly stack the deck at their presentations and they don't have to work to do it. Who but a true believer would pat 8 sheckles to listen to balderdash? But, I'd haul in the shales, etc. just for the nuisance value. Give the turkey something to shout about. Wishing all luck, d |
05-31-2002, 08:50 AM | #20 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: St. John's, Nfld. Canada
Posts: 1,652
|
Quote:
[ May 31, 2002: Message edited by: tgamble ]</p> |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|