FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-07-2003, 05:48 AM   #31
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: glasgow, scotland
Posts: 356
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by HelenM
One thing I feel uncomfortable about with this position is that it may be an attempt to justify the common Christian notion that many non-theists have made a decision of the will against acknowledging those things that would otherwise lead them to belief in God.

Which is parallel but opposite to Mark Twain's comment about faith and facts - which implies that it's believers who by an act of the will decide to believe in spite of facts to the contrary.

malookiemaloo can you explain to me the purpose of your 'passive will' theory? Can you define the will for me?

JT I don't know how to respond to your question. If you're confused by what I wrote that may well because I'm confused. That's certainly possible, imo!

take care
Helen
My own definition of will would be a 'concious voluntary decision to do or believe something'.

Not sure if the passive will is valid after all. I think I'll ditch it again!!


m
malookiemaloo is offline  
Old 03-07-2003, 04:32 PM   #32
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The Deep South
Posts: 889
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by HelenM

I don't know how to respond to your question. If you're confused by what I wrote that may well because I'm confused. That's certainly possible, imo!

take care
Helen [/B]
Helen it is more likely that I have confused me than that you have...I mean it may not have been what was being said that got us conf...no, it's me, I'm sure of it, yes it is me because you said that is that is how I took it was that when we.........

I'll get back to you OK?

JT
Infidelettante is offline  
Old 03-07-2003, 08:05 PM   #33
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Ill
Posts: 6,577
Default

Yes, it's fine for you to get back to me later, JT

Helen
HelenM is offline  
Old 03-09-2003, 05:31 AM   #34
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Texas
Posts: 707
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by malookiemaloo
Are you saying that faith and facts are mutually exclusive? Surely this can't be.
I like to make fun of the way believers use the term "faith". I think they misuse it to mean something that it really doesn't mean. Word twisting in other words.

It is pretty obvious to me that faith should mean something like, "to a high degree of certianty". One would know this because of direct personal experiance and/or a understanding of how the information was obtained. Religion provides neither personal experiance, i.e. everthing is second hand nor any understanding, just look at the contridictions and conflicts with reality in the Bible.

As an example, just look at how one has "faith" that their brakes will work in their car. We know from personal experiance that the brakes will work. We also can know how and why they work.
schu is offline  
Old 03-09-2003, 06:55 AM   #35
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Hollywood, FL
Posts: 408
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by JTVrocher
I'm confused here Helen. Are you saying the will is the same as faith? That it only applies to questions of uncertainty? I don't see that the will is the agent of discrimination in the sense that it weighs the pros and cons of a situantion or of a question. The will comes into play when we choose which side of the question we come down on. Which side we accept or reject and how we act upon it.

JT
Hiya,

I think the will is a conscious act of choosing, as JTVrocher has said; it is a decision. It is "judgment" that JTV is talking about when we weigh the pros and cons of something. "Faith" doesn't weigh the pros and cons nor does it involve a decision. Faith is passive as is defined in Hebrews 11:1, "Now faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen."

And so we have the following order:

Experiencing, understanding, judging, deciding, acting.

Out of our experience we ask questions in order to understand. Once we think that we understand we go on to judge whether what we understand is true or not which also involves asking questions. And then the will/choosing/decision/deliberation/evaluating comes into play when we ask what we will believe according to our experience, understanding, and judging. And then we act on what we have willed/decided to believe.

This is just the bare bones of conscious experience. On any of the levels of consciousness we can screw ourselves up with our biases, wishful thinking, naivete, skepticism, dogmatism, relativism, optimism, pessimism, etc.

Best,
Clarice
Clarice O'C is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:30 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.