FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-31-2002, 05:33 PM   #21
G V
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Question

Quote:
Originally posted by lcb:
<strong>you are right V, according the Uniform Code of Military Justice, oral sex is also considered sodomy.what is your point?</strong>
UCMJ Art 125 "...unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex or with an animal is guilty of sodomy. "

So where does the UCMJ say oral or anal?

Do you think the average recruit/ boot knows what 'unnatural carnal copulation' means ? Does it include 'interfemora' 'tribadism' 'Harvard rub' or 'Princeton rub'?
 
Old 08-31-2002, 06:23 PM   #22
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: I've left FRDB for good, due to new WI&P policy
Posts: 12,048
Cool

Quote:
Originally posted by lcb:
thanks king bud, As you are well aware, there are plenty of loaded questions asked here by atheists.
I'm sure there are, but I doubt I'd agree with you always on which ones were and which ones weren't.
Autonemesis is offline  
Old 08-31-2002, 06:59 PM   #23
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 5,658
Post

Vibr8gKiwi:
Quote:
Oral sex is also sodomy.
Yes, but people often use the word to refer only to anal sex. Not that the distinction matters to me, since I am one either way. *chuckle*

[ August 31, 2002: Message edited by: tronvillain ]</p>
tronvillain is offline  
Old 08-31-2002, 07:12 PM   #24
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: PA USA
Posts: 5,039
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by lcb:
thanks king bud, As you are well aware, there are plenty of loaded questions asked here by atheists.
Kind Bud, I think you've just been promoted.
joedad is offline  
Old 08-31-2002, 07:57 PM   #25
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Mount Pleasant, MI
Posts: 34
Post

I personally don't care whether they are "sodomites" or not - seducing children is wrong either way. Let me put it to you this way: Would it be less wrong for a priest to be involved in vaginal sex with a girl (obviously) than for him to be involved in anal sex with her?

To be honest, I'd actually be more concerned about the first. At least in the latter she can't get pregnant.
raistlinjones is offline  
Old 09-01-2002, 06:33 AM   #26
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 110
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by OutFag:
<strong>Does it include 'interfemora' 'tribadism' 'Harvard rub' or 'Princeton rub'?</strong>

WOW! What are those?

I demand sex education!
Sunfair is offline  
Old 09-01-2002, 07:29 AM   #27
G V
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Sunfair:
<strong>


WOW! What are those?

I demand sex education!</strong>
Google will lead you to 2 references for the first, 2000 for the second and zero for the good old days male only Ivy tricks.

Which reminds me of an old college joke: Why do some Ivy League boys wear all green clothes? Because it's harder to see them doing it under the ivy.

Since I was young, people have said I should write a book. Maybe I just found a title: "Ivy tricks", having been on staff at Columbia and dated a few Penn men.

Think I could get a grant to "research" Ivy tricks?

The rub was the use of your drunk/passed out roommate or male friend by pressing it against stomach or back.

That list came from a 1976 chat I had with six lawyers about the definition of sodomy. I asked if their state law prohibited that list and only one lawyer even knew what interfemora was. I replied in Virginia where only oral or anal with genital penetration is criminal that none of the four was a crime.
 
Old 09-01-2002, 09:17 AM   #28
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Southern US
Posts: 817
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by lcb:
<strong>... As you are well aware, there are plenty of loaded questions asked here by atheists.</strong>
But you are supposed to have God on your side so that you do not have to stoop to such low levels right???

Or to put this another way, if you really possess superior doctrines/morals (ie the real "Truth") why do you feel it necessary to partake in gamemanship and manipulation ?

Sojourner

[ September 01, 2002: Message edited by: Sojourner553 ]</p>
Sojourner553 is offline  
Old 09-01-2002, 09:35 AM   #29
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: I've left FRDB for good, due to new WI&P policy
Posts: 12,048
Lightbulb

joedad: people misspell Kind Bud with a 'g' all the time. I have no idea why, but it never fails. Everywhere I use this alias, one or more people keep spelling it with a 'g' instead of 'd' even after I point it out to them.
Autonemesis is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:34 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.