Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
05-06-2003, 07:48 PM | #41 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,199
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
05-06-2003, 08:00 PM | #42 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Dunmanifestin, Discworld
Posts: 4,836
|
Quote:
Don't appeal to emotion. Lay out your case for why fetuses should be granted the rights of a human being, but don't try to win by associating your opponent with racists. |
|
05-06-2003, 08:07 PM | #43 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: WI
Posts: 4,357
|
Originally posted by yguy
Obviously. The point is that the same logic can be used to justify infanticide. Sorry, I can't "justify infanticide" using the Court's logic. If you want to use abortion jurisprudence to "justify infanticide," be my guest. You just might be able to. Originally posted by yguy What is the state's interest in protecting the right to life of retarded children, or the chronically homeless? Same as its interest in protecting yours. Retarded children and the chronically homeless are "persons." As I said, the state's interest in the life of the unborn increases the further the unborn advances from viability. Is a 32-week-old fetus a "person"? Perhaps. 24-week? Maybe. Three-days-old? I think not. That's probably not even a fetus. So it's probably somewhere in between. Any ideas? Where shall we draw the line, so to speak? Originally posted by yguy Why wouldn't they be, since it's not murder, according to you? Because I'm quite sure that having an abortion is an extremely difficult and uncomfortable decision for most women, if not all. And that is why her privacy is guaranteed, as well as considerations with respect to her physical and psychological health in consultation with her physician. |
05-06-2003, 08:12 PM | #44 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: WI
Posts: 4,357
|
Originally posted by Soyin Milka
I didn't read Hezekiah's post as saying abortion is not murder because it's legal ... Yep, that's what I said, sort of. Murder is not legal. Abortion is legal. Ergo, abortion is not murder. Any state criminal code will confirm this. (lol - Absurdistan. I love it.) |
05-06-2003, 08:24 PM | #45 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,199
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
05-06-2003, 08:27 PM | #46 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Absurdistan
Posts: 299
|
Quote:
If you believe abortion is murder, do you also believe women who get an abortion should be treated like murderers? Soyin |
|
05-06-2003, 08:31 PM | #47 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Absurdistan
Posts: 299
|
Quote:
(Absurdistan is a sorry place. On may sixth, I still have enough snow in my backyard to make a snowman. But thank you!) |
|
05-06-2003, 08:32 PM | #48 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,199
|
Quote:
|
|
05-06-2003, 08:38 PM | #49 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: WI
Posts: 4,357
|
Originally posted by Soyin Milka
Your logic is so cold and abstract, but I mean this in the best possible way. Ha! I guess because I see it as a legal issue rather than a moral one. I have an idea what the state of the law currently is, and I would seriously like to see some arguments put forth against it, aside from this "killing" business. We all know it's "killing." But at least no one has mentioned "holocaust" or "slaughterhouses" yet. |
05-06-2003, 08:41 PM | #50 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: WI
Posts: 4,357
|
Originally posted by yguy
A woman can't be rightly convicted of murder if she didn't believe it WAS murder, because she lacks intent. Ignorance of the law and intent are two completely different issues. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|