Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
09-27-2002, 10:39 PM | #21 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Portland, OR, USA
Posts: 80
|
hooray and hallelujah! Of course, as this cartoon clearly shows, we can't just stop with evolution when it comes to our public schools!
|
09-27-2002, 10:43 PM | #22 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NCSU
Posts: 5,853
|
A fellow grad student sent me these.
[ September 27, 2002: Message edited by: RufusAtticus ]</p> |
09-27-2002, 10:53 PM | #23 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: WI
Posts: 4,357
|
Quote:
If you read the opinion in McLean v. Arkansas, a creationism decision that followed Michael Ruse's testimony having to do with demarcation arguments, and then read Larry Laudan's criticism of the McLean opinion and demarcation criteria in general, you'll start to get an idea where the IDers are coming from. They want a legal definition of science that makes room for the argument from design, an ancient philosophical argument for the existence of god, that will allow ID into the public school curricula. How could it be any other way - the IDers really have no empirical evidence or research program to support their claims. So they depend on tinpot philosophical and legal arguments. |
|
09-28-2002, 02:42 AM | #24 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Just another hick from the sticks.
Posts: 1,108
|
Sad.
But school board elections will be coming around soon enough, and I think that this one will go the way of the Kansas idiotcy, especally if ID is taught as science. doov |
09-28-2002, 05:04 AM | #25 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,751
|
I think it was a writer in The Nation who had a funny remark after the first Kansas decision: Well, on the plus side it means my kids'll get the good jobs.
|
09-28-2002, 07:24 AM | #26 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Silver City, New Mexico
Posts: 1,872
|
Quote:
[ September 28, 2002: Message edited by: wade-w ]</p> |
|
09-28-2002, 10:57 AM | #27 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: FL USA
Posts: 213
|
Quote:
National Center for Science Education reviews of Denton's Nature's Destiny:How the Laws of Biology Reveal Purpose in the Universe <a href="http://www.ncseweb.org/resources/articles/Spieth-on-Denton.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.ncseweb.org/resources/articles/Spieth-on-Denton.pdf</a> Another review: Nature's Destiny: From the impossibility of evolution to the inevitability of evolution: <a href="http://home.planet.nl/~gkorthof/kortho29.htm" target="_blank">http://home.planet.nl/~gkorthof/kortho29.htm</a> Creationists and IDists always FAIL to mention this reversal. This book, unlike the evolution-basher he wrote, was not a best seller. |
|
09-28-2002, 04:08 PM | #28 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,751
|
Bill Craig is, or used to be, based out of Emory. (Though I don't think he had a faculty appointment there).
So he was probably tight with the local forces of know-nothingism and got called in to give a sales pitch. He would be very effective in the absence of prepared rebuttal. Whatever else he is, Craig is fabulously slick with public presentations. |
09-28-2002, 04:33 PM | #29 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,162
|
His <a href="http://www.leaderu.com/offices/billcraig/menus/" target="_blank">website</a> says that he lives in Atlanta.
|
09-28-2002, 07:22 PM | #30 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Just another hick from the sticks.
Posts: 1,108
|
Quote:
However, both of these dipshits have lost a lot of credibilty. Al we've to do is wait a little. doov |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|