Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
05-09-2003, 08:13 AM | #11 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: springfield, MA. USA
Posts: 2,482
|
Thos Aquinas's *PREMISES* are JUNK! Apart from that he's very delightful bathroom/bathtub/and bed reading. ("get you through many a long & weary night"). An unscrupulous Thinker, tho.
Lots of those bright & witty guys (Michelangelo, Dante, Blake, Chagall, John of *Revelations*, et tutti cuanti : all the deity-makers) have invented bunches & bundles of very entertaining verbal & visual materials. Give them & their products credit!. ....Just don't try to use that stuff as enslaving weapons against yourself & yer fellow man, & fellow WOMAN. Sheesh: all that Bach, for Christ's sake... You don't have to BELIEVE the stuff to get a big heavy physical full-body BANG out of those! Nobody shd go deaf or dead w/o hearing the B Minor Mass. And the Old Man's Magnificat. and the *St Matthew Passion*. (Wonder what Gemma Therese thinks of those?) Of course the Smiths, "of whom I am one", besides being the very-early fire-users (Not quite as early as the cooks) and toolmakers, were also the first makers of the gods and fetisches. Kiss my ancestors! |
05-12-2003, 04:36 AM | #12 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 35
|
fallacies
I'm as critical of Christianity as the next. However, some of the arguments on this thread need to be strengthened:
1) authority begins as testimony, eg, forensic. So, argument from authority does not necessarily mean untrustworthy/unacceptable; 2) everybody has presuppositions, that doesn't make something true or untrue; It doesn't serve to two 'sides' using similar weak arguments if their presuppositions are their only difference. By the way, abe smith, I like your point about using one's beliefs to enslave oneself or others! |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|