Veil of Fire

*LOL*
Nice way to get around the 'replying to every line' thing? So is everyone who pins you to the wall going to get ignored?

INTELLECTUALLY
DISHONEST.

Veil of Fire

In other words,

DO
NOT
FEED
THE
TROLL

Queen of Swords

[QUOTE]Originally posted by AtlanticCitySlave:
<strong> Again, I have already said my credentials have nothing to do with this conversation</strong>

Translation : you have none?

<strong>If you refuse to take into consideration what I say simply because I won’t tell you my “credentials”, then simply don’t respond. </strong>

Thanks for the suggestion, but I think I'll respond anyway, if that's all right with you.

<strong>Writing in this tone to someone does not exactly breed good dialogue,</strong>

So now the excuses have expanded to :

1. responding to each of your points
2. tone

I wish you would keep posting, Slave. I'd have loved to see what your next reason for evasion would have been.

<strong>I have already made it clear why I don’t respond to Queen of Swords (she is rude)</strong>

I know; how terrible it is to be placed in a position where you have to justify your claims. How shocked, nay, violated you must have felt to have your fantasies/theories questioned.

<strong>I’ve decided, since the tone of this conversation won’t change and it’s leading nowhere, to make this my last post.</strong>

Good riddance.

<strong>I’m not interested in discussing something with people who have their mind all made up </strong>

Were you interested in finding people who did not have opinions on child abuse and who might therefore be swayed to your point-of-view regarding adult sexual activity with children?

Just curious...

bonduca

I noticed that he refused to answer my question.

Veil of Fire

Well, if he'd answered you, he wouldn't be a very good troll, no would he?

bonduca

I forgot that it forbids that in the Troll Manual.

Warren Sinden

Now we've degenerated ourselves to shit-flinging?

I am closing this thread - if anyone has evidence that an actual conversation worth saving is present, please email me and I'll re-open. All I see is a re-hash of a long-deleted thread.

[ June 16, 2002: Message edited by: Bree ]</p>