FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Secular Community Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 09:28 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-10-2003, 12:49 PM   #31
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 122
Default

2 younger sisters (we're all about 2 years apart)
0 kids planned, although that's not set in stone...yet >:]
Rosiel is offline  
Old 04-10-2003, 01:35 PM   #32
Sol
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Desert Southwest
Posts: 621
Default

Way off base - generalizations never apply.

I'm one of four children. I'm the only married one. I'm the only one to have a child (as in singular).

My husband is one of five. He was the last to marry. Our family unit is the smallest of any on his side, everyone else has two to three.
Sol is offline  
Old 04-10-2003, 02:10 PM   #33
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Sydney Australia and beyond the realms of Gehenna
Posts: 6,035
Default

just a side question, i hope its not considered derailing. But to those of you who want more than 2 children, dont you ever worry about the environmental impact of such a thing, especially considering how overcrowded the world already is, and that the amount of clean resources is getting smaller?

personally, if i ever were to have children <can you say, highly unlikely?>, 2 would be the maximum. just enough to replace you and your partner.
ju'iblex is offline  
Old 04-10-2003, 02:26 PM   #34
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 6,264
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by ju'iblex
just a side question, i hope its not considered derailing. But to those of you who want more than 2 children, dont you ever worry about the environmental impact of such a thing, especially considering how overcrowded the world already is, and that the amount of clean resources is getting smaller?

personally, if i ever were to have children <can you say, highly unlikely?>, 2 would be the maximum. just enough to replace you and your partner.
In our society, I don't think 3 would be bad, because it would likely even out with other couples who have less than 2. Four may be pushing it. The people who scare me are the good catholics like the guy here at work with 10 (ages 19 to 18 months).

They homeschool too, just to make it harder on themselves. They can't trust the public schools system to educate them properly and they can't afford tuition to the catholic schools.
ImGod is offline  
Old 04-10-2003, 02:34 PM   #35
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,578
Default

I have one younger brother. Rufus has 2 older brothers.

No children yet, but I really think 3 would be the limit. My dad had 5 sibs, my mom 2--but just two children for them. All of my 1st cousins are either onlies or pairs.

My mom's joke is that my dad would tease and say he wanted a dozen children--then they had me. I think that just means that my precious daddy loves me as much as 11.5 children combined (hey, got to leave a little love for my brother!)

--tibac
wildernesse is offline  
Old 04-10-2003, 03:22 PM   #36
pz
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Morris, MN
Posts: 3,341
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by ju'iblex
just a side question, i hope its not considered derailing. But to those of you who want more than 2 children, dont you ever worry about the environmental impact of such a thing, especially considering how overcrowded the world already is, and that the amount of clean resources is getting smaller?
Yes. We really only planned to have two, but we discovered this horrible, devious, nasty little secret.

Kids between the ages of 2 and 4 are just incredibly adorable.

They're no longer totally dependent on you (no diapers!), they're cute, they've got a personality, and they're so gosh-darned wide-eyed and enthusiastic about everything. We got charmed into having just one more.

I've since decided that the most potent contraceptive in the world is to live in the same house with a teenager -- they are the perfect antithesis of a two-year-old, and will persuade you that you want nothing to do with kids ever again (nothing personal, of course).
pz is offline  
Old 04-10-2003, 03:24 PM   #37
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Dunmanifestin, Discworld
Posts: 4,836
Default

One sibling, don't want any kids. If I ever do have kids, won't be many, maybe one or two.
elwoodblues is offline  
Old 04-10-2003, 03:51 PM   #38
Obsessed Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Not Mayaned
Posts: 96,752
Default

No siblings, no children. However, my wife has 6 siblings.
Loren Pechtel is offline  
Old 04-10-2003, 03:53 PM   #39
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,215
Default

Regarding family size: Someone this board stated not long ago that a mother is only as happy as her most unhappy child.

I'd have to say there's some truth to that for me.

So the more kids you have, the more chance someone isn't happy.

I enjoy my adolescent kids. But ask me again in an hour to see if that's still the case.
openeyes is offline  
Old 04-10-2003, 05:40 PM   #40
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Augusta, Maine, USA
Posts: 2,046
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by ImGod
In our society, I don't think 3 would be bad, because it would likely even out with other couples who have less than 2. Four may be pushing it. The people who scare me are the good catholics like the guy here at work with 10 (ages 19 to 18 months).


That's a pretty good description of the family I grew up in. I was the oldest, and had just turned 18 and was a freshman in college when my youngest brother was born.

The ten of us collectively now have 22 kids. The two youngest don't have kids (yet). The majority of us have 2 kids apiece.

Although we loved growing up in a large family, and get along very well now that we're mostly in our 30's & 40's, none of us wanted to have a huge family (although one sister came close, with 5 kids). Times were different back in the 60's, especially for Catholics. But even in our church, we were an unusually large family.
babelfish is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:10 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.