FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-10-2002, 09:55 AM   #11
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: With 10,000 lakes who needs a coast?
Posts: 10,762
Post

I was assigned part of Genesis and all of Luke for two different high school English classes, and they were indeed treated like any other piece of literature. In fact, the class that assigned Genesis was "Myth and Modern Man" where we also read a Babylonian creation myth, among others.
Godless Dave is offline  
Old 06-10-2002, 08:06 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New Almaden, California
Posts: 917
Cool

Thank you, everyone for your suggestions. What a great group is here!

Godless Dave, I'm curious about the class you had, since you had to read the same Books. Can you elaborate?

Gilly
gilly54 is offline  
Old 06-11-2002, 02:35 AM   #13
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Camelot
Posts: 290
Cool

The Oxford Annotated Bible is the Christian New Revised Standard Version (NRSV) with notes. I think a big Oxford scholar by the name of Bruce Metzger had his hand in this translation though he too is a Christian.
King Arthur is offline  
Old 06-11-2002, 05:44 AM   #14
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: With 10,000 lakes who needs a coast?
Posts: 10,762
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by gilly54:
<strong>Godless Dave, I'm curious about the class you had, since you had to read the same Books. Can you elaborate?
</strong>
Sorry, it was 15 years ago, so I don't remember much. All I remember from "Myth and Modern Man" was that the teacher was trying to say that "In the beginning" was a common theme in most mythology. The class also incorporated some of Joseph Campbell's ideas about myth.

I read the gospel of Luke in a different class altogether, AP English Literature. I didn't understand what the class was supposed to be about at the time, and I don't remember any of it now.
Godless Dave is offline  
Old 06-11-2002, 05:44 AM   #15
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: GA
Posts: 69
Post

I heard the Gideon's Bible burns longer, but I could be wrong. Anyone do any research on this?

--FaithNoMore
FaithNoMore is offline  
Old 06-11-2002, 07:54 AM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Yes, I have dyslexia. Sue me.
Posts: 6,508
Wink

Tell her to read my version. It makes a hell of a lot more sense (the fuller version is <a href="http://www.hideinplainwebsite.com/Genesis%20Revisited.html" target="_blank">at my website</a>).

Here's Genesis 1:1-8 for a sample:

Quote:
1: In the beginning Thought created the mind and the earth.
2: And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Awareness of Thought moved upon the face of the waters.
3: And Thought said, Let there be light: and there was light.
4: And Thought saw the light, that it was good: and Thought divided the light from the darkness.
5: And Thought called the light Day, and the darkness It called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.
6: And Thought said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.
7: And Thought made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.
8: And Thought called the firmament Mind. And the evening and the morning were the second day.
Koyaanisqatsi is offline  
Old 06-11-2002, 08:35 AM   #17
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 68
Post

I recommend the HarperCollins NRSV Study Bible. It is made by the Society of Biblical Literature. It was also endorsed by my college professor in a class covering the Hebrew Bible (OT). It's written in easy-to-read English and contains helpful notes from biblical scholars.
Jayman is offline  
Old 06-11-2002, 08:40 AM   #18
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 63
Post

The two best study bibles out there are the Harper Collins and the Oxford. Generally, I think the footnotes in the Harper Collins are a little more extensive than those in the Oxford; but the scholarship is sound in both.

I highly recommend the Revised English Bible (available in an Oxford edition) for readability. The New Revised Standard Version is also an excellent translation.

Both translations were done by mainstream scholars, and are generally reviled by fundamentalists.

Joshua
Rev. Joshua is offline  
Old 06-11-2002, 08:47 AM   #19
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: With 10,000 lakes who needs a coast?
Posts: 10,762
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Rev. Joshua:
<strong>Both translations were done by mainstream scholars, and are generally reviled by fundamentalists.</strong>
Fundamentalists who probably can't read a word of Greek, let alone ancient Hebrew.
Godless Dave is offline  
Old 06-11-2002, 02:52 PM   #20
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Camelot
Posts: 290
Talking

Get the New World Translation (NWT)! That'll raise some eyebrows!
King Arthur is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:34 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.