Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
03-13-2003, 01:31 PM | #11 | |||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1,315
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Sounds like rather dubious quality research to me... Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||
03-13-2003, 03:31 PM | #12 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: the 10th planet
Posts: 5,065
|
“Maybe. TV "experts" are not necessarily the real thing.”
Tercel is correct here, I’ve seen many shows like this with so called ‘experts’. I’ve seen them present Zechariah Sitchin as a “Biblical Scholar” he is a Biblical Scholar only because he says he is. His actual degree is in The History of Economics and he was a newspaper editor. Other “experts” are often identified as Joe Blow “author”. Anyone can be an author. If they don’t identify the speaker by his degree of expertise and the University he is associated with, I take what the say with a grain of salt. BTW the ancient document being refereed to is “The Epic of Gilgamesh”. |
03-13-2003, 06:56 PM | #13 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Midwest
Posts: 424
|
Blah blah blah.
Tercel, of course I'm refuting the fundamentalist idea of the flood. If it was a real flood that was just exaggerated, then I can say that all the stories in the Bible were real but exaggerated! Like, Jesus was a real dude, but the story was exaggerated, so people said he rose from the dead. If you don't want me to read the Bible the way it really reads, then that's fine. I could then believe it, yet believe it according to what I want it to mean. I can say one story was exaggerated, but another one was not. You can't know which ones were and which ones were not exaggerated. Your defenses are highly unlikely and ridiculous. Like God would say, "Moses, write down that old story about the flood that you heard about." That pretty much kills the power of the story. That's stupid. If someone on this forum has stupid arguments, it's really obvious, and we'll tell you. There are other Christians on this forum who usually have intelligent comebacks or comments, but so far, I have not seen any good feedback from you - or Old Man, or Magus, for that matter. Come back with something of substance for once. And as for the "experts" on the TV show. Whether they are "real" or not does matter to me, nor does it matter if the show was one sided. You know why? Because we've had Christianity shoved down our throats for 2000 years, by "experts" who all disagree, and are very one sided! So it's about time to hear another point of view god damn it! |
03-13-2003, 07:04 PM | #14 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Midwest
Posts: 424
|
Marduk,
The show DID identify the speakers by their degrees of expertise, and the universities they are associated with. So their comments are not to be taken with a grain of salt, but are to be seriously considered. Excuse me for not taking notes while I watched TV. |
03-13-2003, 07:17 PM | #15 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Waterbury, Ct, Usa
Posts: 6,523
|
Quote:
Vinnie |
|
03-13-2003, 07:19 PM | #16 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Waterbury, Ct, Usa
Posts: 6,523
|
Quote:
Vinnie |
|
03-13-2003, 08:10 PM | #17 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Orions Belt
Posts: 3,911
|
Carrie, something to keep in mind. Tercel is a very liberal Xian from New Zealand, who has never been to the U.S., and really doesn't understand the Fundy position or why we spend so much time battling it.
|
03-13-2003, 08:22 PM | #18 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 15,576
|
Quote:
|
|
03-13-2003, 08:56 PM | #19 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Waterbury, Ct, Usa
Posts: 6,523
|
Quote:
I had difficulty believing these people were for real at first Vinnie |
|
03-13-2003, 09:08 PM | #20 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Orions Belt
Posts: 3,911
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|