FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-03-2002, 05:16 AM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: anywhere
Posts: 1,976
Post

I don't get it. According to MG, he doesn't think it's science or something to be taught. What else is there to discuss?
Principia is offline  
Old 09-03-2002, 06:24 AM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: St. John's, Nfld. Canada
Posts: 1,652
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Scientiae:
<strong>I don't get it. According to MG, he doesn't think it's science or something to be taught. What else is there to discuss?</strong>
Getting the evil, satanic, anti christian, anti biblical lie of evolution out of the schools.
tgamble is offline  
Old 09-03-2002, 07:12 AM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Heaven
Posts: 6,980
Post

Yup, once we get a designer in the schools, the only logical question is "Who is that designer?"

Well, since we MUST consider a designer, and who would that designer be?
Jesus Tap-Dancin' Christ is offline  
Old 09-03-2002, 02:02 PM   #14
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Kansas
Posts: 169
Cool

Ralph Lauren?
Lizard is offline  
Old 09-03-2002, 03:45 PM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 2,362
Post

from the report (regarding the up side of the ID movement):

Quote:
It has produced some materials and arguments which, though not necessarily designed to help the battle for Biblical creation, have been very useful in this cause.
Something strikes me as inherently hilarious about creationists talking about something being co-opted for a purpose for which it wasn't designed.

m.
Undercurrent is offline  
Old 09-03-2002, 05:57 PM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Alaska, USA
Posts: 1,535
Smile

Quote:
One could ask such objectors whether they are aware of any origins teaching outside of the Abrahamic stream which:
Claims to be absolute revelational truth from the Creator in documentary form
This conveniently rules out ALL creation stories from pre-literate cultures. But of course, since the criteria were contrived to eliminate all but the favored version. As I see it, though, schools would still have to teach the <a href="http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/upan/index.htm" target="_blank">Upanishads</a>, <a href="http://www.sacred-texts.com/ane/enuma.htm" target="_blank">Enuma Elish</a>, the Zend Avesta, the Egyptian Book of the Dead, etc. I especially like the 4th criterion; since the only evidence for a particular creation story is merely evidence offered against evolution, it can apply equally to any story.
Grumpy is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:22 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.