Quote:
tgamble:
Yeah, by creationists bitching about being censored and not being able to publish in journals because of the evil evolutionist conspiracy to draw people away from GOD'S TRUTH and towards SATAN'S LIE of evolution blah blah blah.
|
Darth Brooks started by claiming that there are lots of published examples of creationist primary research, then told us to prove there aren't, then posted a pathetic article from a creationist magazine, then protested that he didn't mean for it to be an example of creationist primary research, then whined that he didn't have time to dig up an example, then claimed that he had provided enough examples of creationists with PhD's that he shouldn't have to provide an example of creationist primary research, and now he is referring us to this guy from ICR (who seems no better at providing the example that we await). Even better, Darth Brooks has been alternating between claiming that lots of biologists are dumping evolution and going for creationism, and claiming that creationist articles cannot be published because of the conspiracy among biologists. He has also recently stooped to the old 2LoT argument. A real gem.
Peez
06-25-2002, 01:24 PM
