FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-12-2003, 09:16 AM   #61
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Augusta, Georgia, United States
Posts: 1,235
Default

Wow, Stephen, it's amazing how much more sense that makes than the fairy tales I'd been hearing up to this point! Very well said.
Ensign Steve is offline  
Old 03-12-2003, 09:31 AM   #62
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: southeast
Posts: 2,526
Cool Who are Mary's parents?

Quote:
Originally posted by the_cave
The only Annunciation celebrated (currently) by the church is the one to Mary, and the Immaculate Conception is assumed to have taken place by regular old marital relations between Anne & Joachim (which could well be legendary names, as even the Church will state
The Catholic view is that Mary’s parents were Anne and Joachim? Do Catholics not use the “Genealogy of Mary” defense for the two differing genealogies of Jesus in Matthew and Luke?
Asha'man is offline  
Old 03-12-2003, 09:43 AM   #63
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Stephen T-B
How about this?
Thus sayeth the rationalist who hasn't got the foggiest notion of the difference between Judaism and Catholicism.
 
Old 03-12-2003, 10:24 AM   #64
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 5,878
Default

Roman Catholics think Jesus was the Messiah.
Jews don't.
Seems quite a crucual difference to me.
Stephen T-B is offline  
Old 03-12-2003, 11:01 AM   #65
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Stephen T-B
Roman Catholics think Jesus was the Messiah.
Jews don't.
Seems quite a crucual difference to me.
Very good with the only difference that this all happeded 300 years after the alledged fact and so there was nothing to recognize as a point of reference to think about.
 
Old 03-12-2003, 03:08 PM   #66
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,443
Default Re: Who are Mary's parents?

Quote:
Originally posted by Asha'man
The Catholic view is that Mary’s parents were Anne and Joachim? Do Catholics not use the “Genealogy of Mary” defense for the two differing genealogies of Jesus in Matthew and Luke?
It's one idea, and a common one. But it's not doctrine. Obviously they can't both be right, so you can take your pick, I suppose, if you want to. They're two separate traditions.
the_cave is offline  
Old 03-13-2003, 04:00 PM   #67
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: new york
Posts: 608
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Stephen T-B

Faith is unthinking; Faith is blind - as Gemma T. demonstrates time and time again.
"Faith is not an emotion, not a feeling. It is not a blind sub-conscious urge towards something vaguely supernatural. It is not a feeling that God exists. It is also not an opinion. It is not a conviction based on rational analysis.

Faith is an intellectual assent. It perfects the mind, it does not destroy it. It puts the intellect in possession of Truth which reason cannot grasp by itself."

~Thomas Merton
Gemma Therese is offline  
Old 03-13-2003, 06:01 PM   #68
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Augusta, Georgia, United States
Posts: 1,235
Default

If Thomas Merton said it, it must be true.
Ensign Steve is offline  
Old 03-13-2003, 07:05 PM   #69
Cthulhu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Gemma Therese
"Faith is not an emotion, not a feeling. It is not a blind sub-conscious urge towards something vaguely supernatural. It is not a feeling that God exists. It is also not an opinion. It is not a conviction based on rational analysis.

Faith is an intellectual assent. It perfects the mind, it does not destroy it. It puts the intellect in possession of Truth which reason cannot grasp by itself."

~Thomas Merton
"We may define 'faith' as a firm belief in something for which there is not evidence ... Where here is evidence, no one speaks of 'faith'. We only speak of faith when we wish to substitute emotion for evidence." - Bertrand Russell
 
Old 03-13-2003, 07:17 PM   #70
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Cthulhu
"We may define 'faith' as a firm belief in something for which there is not evidence ... Where here is evidence, no one speaks of 'faith'. We only speak of faith when we wish to substitute emotion for evidence." - Bertrand Russell
Yes, but Russell was an atheist and speaks as an impoverished believer and therefore has emotion mixed up with faith. In other words, he rejected the fuzzy feeling church.
 
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:13 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.