FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB General Discussion Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 02:40 PM

View Poll Results: Dictatorship or Democracy?
Dictatorship 14 26.92%
Democracy 38 73.08%
Voters: 52. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-11-2003, 01:19 AM   #21
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: In a cardboard box under the viaduct.
Posts: 2,107
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Krieger
In a real dictatorship there would be no legislative body and would have only one individual that writes/passes law (i.e. dictates).
Not if the leglislative body is basically chosen by the dictator or his party and/or basically rubberstamps everything the dictator wants to do. Iraq under Saddam? USA under Bush?


Warren in Oklahoma
Gawdawful is offline  
Old 08-11-2003, 01:52 AM   #22
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Cleveland, OH, USA Folding@Home Godless Team
Posts: 6,211
Default

some dictatorships

catholic church
southern baptists
jim jones
david koresh
mormons
sakrilege is offline  
Old 08-11-2003, 02:29 AM   #23
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,054
Default Re: Dictatorship or Democracy

Quote:
Originally posted by Ultron
OK everyone, which political system do you prefer? Dictatorship or Democracy?
Neither. I prefer a democratic constitutional republic, which, unlike a pure democracy, protects the basic rights of the minority (e.g., freedom of speech) from the whims of the majority.

Todd Altman
TMA68 is offline  
Old 08-11-2003, 02:52 AM   #24
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: England
Posts: 2,608
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Ultron
It's not pointless. I really wonder if there are people here who prefer dictatorships to democracies.
Why shouldn't there be?

It's this old 'democracy is the best' argument again?
meritocrat is offline  
Old 08-11-2003, 05:58 AM   #25
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: American in China
Posts: 620
Default

The best form of government is a benevolent dictatorship. In general, though, a democracy is better than a dictatorship. I guess I'll just remain undecided on this one.
conkermaniac is offline  
Old 08-11-2003, 06:01 AM   #26
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: England
Posts: 2,608
Default

Contradiction, no? Didn't you start a thread stating that democracy is the 'ultimate form of government'.
meritocrat is offline  
Old 08-11-2003, 08:37 AM   #27
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Denver, Colorado, USA
Posts: 4,834
Default

I think that my hierarchy goes something like this:

Healthy Representative Democracy or Constitutional Monarchy.
Healthy Direct Democracy (Swiss are closest model)
Monarchy w/ limited Democratic role (UAE, Papacy or 1700 Britian).
Dominant Party Rep. Democracy (like 1960s Mexico or India)
Secure One Party System (e.g. China or Cuba or post-Stalin USSR)
Absolute Monarchy (e.g. Saudi or Nepal now, 1920s Thailand)
Dicatatorship which is not genocidal (e.g. Burma or Pakistan)
Grossly Incompetent Representative Democracy (like pre-coup governments throughout third world).
Unhealthy Direct Democracy (Salem in 1600s or French Revolution)
Genocidal Dictatorship (Pol Pot, Stalin, Rwanda, Hitler)
ohwilleke is offline  
Old 08-11-2003, 08:42 AM   #28
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Denver, Colorado, USA
Posts: 4,834
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by sakrilege
some dictatorships

catholic church
southern baptists
jim jones
david koresh
mormons
Southern Baptists are actually extremely Democratic. Every church has a right to drop out at will. Leaders are elected. Central policy does not bind local churches. It is a huge contrast with the other four examples that at least formally had a supreme leader.

The college of cardinals in the Catholic church, and similar consultive bodies among the Mormons, while not precisely democratically elected, make these bodies more democratic than Jim Jones or Koresh.
ohwilleke is offline  
Old 08-11-2003, 10:46 AM   #29
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 462
Exclamation

I will probably regret posting this sometime in the future because of all the evil-gelicals that monitor these sights...

but it is good to remember what Stalin said about "democracy":
"it is he who counts the votes that wins" !

How many of you vote inside a church? Hmmmm?
anti-X is offline  
Old 08-11-2003, 03:00 PM   #30
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Cleveland, OH, USA Folding@Home Godless Team
Posts: 6,211
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by ohwilleke
Southern Baptists are actually extremely Democratic. Every church has a right to drop out at will. Leaders are elected. Central policy does not bind local churches.
I was thinking along the lines of the Disney boycott and Baptist Board. Do individual members vote for the leaders?


Quote:
The college of cardinals in the Catholic church, and similar consultive bodies among the Mormons, while not precisely democratically elected, make these bodies more democratic than Jim Jones or Koresh.
At least for the catholics, the cardinal choice is heavily influenced by the pope, stacking the deck toward his outlook. I don't know about the mormons.


Other organizations:

Military
CEOs/Corporations - other than share holder voting
sakrilege is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:39 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.