FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-16-2002, 12:19 PM   #11
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Takaliapa, KR
Posts: 188
Post

Finally! Someone fighting against Creationist linguistic idiocy! Have any of them studied classical and modern Chinese?
Heleilu is offline  
Old 02-16-2002, 02:45 PM   #12
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
Post

Good point! Although the spoken langauge was undoubtedly more complex than spoken mandarin, just as Taiwanese, Cantonese and the other languages are today much more complex than Mandarin.

Michael
Vorkosigan is offline  
Old 02-16-2002, 03:00 PM   #13
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 81
Post

How complex is English? It is recognised as being the most difficult language for a foreigner to learn, it has more irregular verbs that any other, at 184. It's spelling and pronunciation would have driven a latin speaker to distraction.

Given these factors, I would say it is probably one of, if not the most complex languages in world history.
DireStraits is offline  
Old 02-16-2002, 03:15 PM   #14
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 40
Wink

Well, I know of one creationist that is working pretty hard toward evolving the English language: President Bush. And I think we'd better not misunderestimate him on this one...
Buckster is offline  
Old 02-16-2002, 03:28 PM   #15
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by DireStraits:
<strong>How complex is English? It is recognised as being the most difficult language for a foreigner to learn, it has more irregular verbs that any other, at 184. It's spelling and pronunciation would have driven a latin speaker to distraction.</strong>
Latin??? There is nobody today who has Latin as their native language. However, that may be correct for Romance-language speakers; those speakers' languages are descendants of Latin.

And where was this "recognized"???

Also, English irregular verbs are easier than this description implies; English verb morphology is very simple, and one has to learn only an extra one or two forms for nearly all of them. And though English has a large number of compound verb tenses, all of them are regularly formed.

And while I will concede that English spelling might best be described as semi-logographic, there are lots of rules that work much of the time. English spelling isn't as bad as either Chinese or Japanese spelling, IMO. And as to English being difficult to pronounce, I don't see what's the great difficulty. While some English sounds are not very common, one can find plenty of tongue-twisters in other languages, such as Chinese tones.

I think that one indicator of language difficulty might be how long it takes to achieve some reasonable level of proficiency; that can be estimated from the lengths of various language courses. I recall from somewhere the lengths of various courses offered by some US government agency to various people who need to learn other languages. Spanish requires a relatively short course, while German requires a longer course, Russian a longer course, and Arabic or Japanese an even longer course.
lpetrich is offline  
Old 02-16-2002, 04:05 PM   #16
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 77
Post

Modern English is a great lingua franca because it developed (in part) as a lingua franca. When widespread travel began, it got caught in a positive feedback loop.

-Neil
NeilUnreal is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:54 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.