FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-01-2003, 10:24 PM   #51
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 5,393
Thumbs down a new low...

Quote:
Originally posted by yguy
...abortion encourages black men to treat women like sluts, and black women to act like sluts.
The most serious problem this post poses is what to condemn first: the racism, the sexism, or the baseless assertion about abortion's effects.
Dr Rick is offline  
Old 06-02-2003, 07:21 AM   #52
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,199
Default Re: a new low...

Quote:
Originally posted by Dr Rick
The most serious problem this post poses is what to condemn first: the racism, the sexism, or the baseless assertion about abortion's effects.
The last could be debated, I suppose, but that many black men are misogynists and many black women are promiscuous is neither racist nor sexist, but a recognition of the obvious. Gangstarap glorifies this behavior, for crying out loud.
yguy is offline  
Old 06-02-2003, 08:45 AM   #53
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: somewhere in the known Universe
Posts: 6,993
Default

Here is a study on the decline in teenage pregnancy:

http://www.agi-usa.org/pubs/or_teen_preg_decline.html

Quote:
The last could be debated, I suppose, but that many black men are misogynists and many black women are promiscuous is neither racist nor sexist, but a recognition of the obvious. Gangstarap glorifies this behavior, for crying out loud.
Only if your interaction with black men and women is via MTV or the Source Awards.

Your statements are not obvious to the millions of black men and women who are neither misogynistic nor promiscuous. It is offensive to suggest that the color of one's skin determines behavior, or equates to specific behaviors. There are plenty of people, regardless of skin color, who are misogynists and/or promiscuous (including plenty of white men and women.)

Gangstarap does glorify certain behaviors (but not all of it does), however to formulate ideas about millions of people by the views expressed by a FEW in pop culture is wrong-headed.

After spending my weekend as the sole white woman in a large, diverse group of non-white people (mainly black women and children) I cannot even begin to tell you how wrong you are.

I would suggest expanding your base of interaction with non-white people, and just as white people aren't adequately represented by red-neck hicks or KKK members the whole of Black, American culture cannot be fit into the narrow box of gangstarap.

Brighid
brighid is offline  
Old 06-02-2003, 09:50 AM   #54
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,199
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by brighid
Your statements are not obvious to the millions of black men and women who are neither misogynistic nor promiscuous. It is offensive to suggest that the color of one's skin determines behavior, or equates to specific behaviors.
Kindly produce the quote where I suggested such a thing. I am perfectly aware that not all black people are that way, but in no other race has such behavior reached such epidemic proportions. I suspect this is because they've been targeted by liberal racists who are using them to economically intimidate productive citizens.

Quote:
There are plenty of people, regardless of skin color, who are misogynists and/or promiscuous (including plenty of white men and women.)

Gangstarap does glorify certain behaviors (but not all of it does), however to formulate ideas about millions of people by the views expressed by a FEW in pop culture is wrong-headed.
I haven't done that, of course. However, the existence of such cultural icons as Tupac Shakur et al is prima facie evidence of a market for their product - and producers of this swill aren't targeting preppies or valley girls, am I right?

Quote:
After spending my weekend as the sole white woman in a large, diverse group of non-white people (mainly black women and children) I cannot even begin to tell you how wrong you are.
You have shown a distinct proclivity for misinterpreting what I say. I do try to be careful about how I phrase things, but of course that isn't much help if you don't read carefully.
yguy is offline  
Old 06-02-2003, 09:56 AM   #55
dk
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,774
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by everlastingtongue
I made no reference to race in any of my posts, nor do I presume that abortion benefits any racial group over another – your racial inferences are your own and not mine.

An abortion ban would only affect those not able to travel abroad. Unless abortion was banned worldwide, that would be a fact. How that breaks down in racial terms is obviously important to consider, but it was in no way part of my original argument.
The claimed was... Poor benefit from legal abortion. The poor are disproportionately black. The inference was there, and its not clear that black people have benefited from abortion, while it is clear there's 35% fewer black people because of legal abortion. If we are to find an alternative to abortion, then the first step is to seperate the myth from the reality. Is abortion a covert attempt to cull poor black people, poor people or help them?
dk is offline  
Old 06-02-2003, 10:29 AM   #56
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: somewhere in the known Universe
Posts: 6,993
Default

Kindly reproduced

Quote:
The last could be debated, I suppose, but that many black men are misogynists and many black women are promiscuous is neither racist nor sexist, but a recognition of the obvious. Gangstarap glorifies this behavior, for crying out loud.[/
What this says to me is that you equate the blackness of one's skin to be the "obvious" reason that many (not some, but many) black men are misogynist and many (not some) are promiscuous because "gangstarap glorifies this behavior, for crying out loud. (emphasis added), hence I concluded those statements to be BOTH racist and sexist and NOT at all the "obvious" reason why people who fit those criteria are what you claim.

You will find comparable number of people of varying ethnic background, who for any number of environmental reasons have been taught these bad attitudes and behaviors, none of which is caused by the color of ones skin.

I simply pointed out that (and I will further clarify) the MANY people you surreptitiously placed in the categories of misogynist and promiscuous based on the color of their skin, as evidenced by the music produced by the FEW is a narrow minded conclusion and only represents a portion of urban culture, part of which is represented by black Americans.

Furthermore, I read your statements "carefully" and to suggest that I did otherwise because I did not come to the conclusion you desired to represent (but did not make clear) is an inaccurate conclusion.

Quote:
I haven't done that, of course. However, the existence of such cultural icons as Tupac Shakur et al is prima facie evidence of a market for their product - and producers of this swill aren't targeting preppies or valley girls, am I right?
I would say this simply speaks to your ignorance of who purchases "gangsta rap." My husband and I have an extensive collection of "gangsta rap", including Tupac, DMX, Ice Cube, Lil' Kim, Rough Riders, etc. We are neither black, my husband is certainly not misogynist, nor am I promiscuous. We are middle class, professional, educated people who simply enjoy that music for different reasons. I know many people with similar backgrounds that enjoy that music as well. We so happen to partake of a wide berth of musical enjoyment from classical (my husband minored in music history), to blues, jazz, hip-hop, new age all the way to gangsta rap (with a noted exception to most country music.) The demographics on those who purchases gangsta rap is varied and not exclusive to urban youth of non-white skin. Is gangsta rap marketed toward children in gated communities and "valley girls?" I don't think that is there target market, but correlation does not equal causation.

Gangstarap and rap music in general has socio-political roots, although some artists like Lil'Kim and 50 Cent are simply exploiting a cross-cultural (because white kids listen to it too) pop music wave of success, that do not reflect those roots.

However, I would ask the question - so what? Does the existence of such products and the market for it equate to the "many" conclusion you have made, or that black men and women who listen to gangstarap are misogynist or promiscuous? I would conclude that the answer is no!

Quote:
You have shown a distinct proclivity for misinterpreting what I say. I do try to be careful about how I phrase things, but of course that isn't much help if you don't read carefully.
A distinct proclivity? That is a pretty serious accusation. I would suggest that you prove that up. I did not misrepresent what you said. I simply quoted what you said, responded to those statements, and pointed out what I felt were errors in your reasoning. You attempted to clarify, but in your clarification I still I have yet to be presented with a reason to change the conclusions I drew from your statements.

Brighid
brighid is offline  
Old 06-02-2003, 11:42 AM   #57
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,199
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by brighid
What this says to me is that you equate the blackness of one's skin to be the "obvious" reason that many (not some, but many) black men are misogynist and many (not some) are promiscuous because "gangstarap glorifies this behavior, for crying out loud. (emphasis added), hence I concluded those statements to be BOTH racist and sexist and NOT at all the "obvious" reason why people who fit those criteria are what you claim.
Then you are either deficient in your ability to comprehend the written word or deliberately misunderstanding. Your premise is utterly false, an inference improperly drawn from what I said. If this behavior were endemic to the black race, it would have been a problem long before the 60's.

Quote:
Furthermore, I read your statements "carefully" and to suggest that I did otherwise because I did not come to the conclusion you desired to represent (but did not make clear) is an inaccurate conclusion.
I'm afraid it isn't, ma'am.

Quote:
Is gangsta rap marketed toward children in gated communities and "valley girls?" I don't think that is there target market,
That, of course, was the point.

Quote:
but correlation does not equal causation.
Obviously, which is why I never claimed that gangstarap caused this behavior.

Quote:
However, I would ask the question - so what? Does the existence of such products and the market for it equate to the "many" conclusion you have made, or that black men and women who listen to gangstarap are misogynist or promiscuous? I would conclude that the answer is no!
The fact that such "music" is even held in high esteem is a sign of something rotten in the black community, just as the tolerance for advocacy of pedophilia is a sign of something rotten in Amsterdam.

Quote:
A distinct proclivity? That is a pretty serious accusation. I would suggest that you prove that up.
Your post IS the proof.

Quote:
I did not misrepresent what you said. I simply quoted what you said, responded to those statements, and pointed out what I felt were errors in your reasoning.
You said that I "equate the blackness of one's skin to be the 'obvious' reason that many (not some, but many) black men are misogynist and many (not some) are promiscuous..." That's a blatant distortion at best.

Now brighid, you perhaps have figured out by now that no one on this board is more genially willing to make enemies than I am...and if you keep misrepresenting me, you're gonna be another one. If you're OK with that, then believe me, so am I.
yguy is offline  
Old 06-02-2003, 12:00 PM   #58
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: somewhere in the known Universe
Posts: 6,993
Default

Quote:
Then you are either deficient in your ability to comprehend the written word or deliberately misunderstanding. Your premise is utterly false, an inference improperly drawn from what I said. If this behavior were endemic to the black race, it would have been a problem long before the 60's.
I would say that I am neither deficient in my ability to comprehend the written word, or deliberately misunderstanding anything you have written. Perhaps it is simply your abrasive style and trite commentary that is at the root of the problem, as it seems (by your own admission) that your willingness to make enemies interferes with your ability to present commentary, or conclusion that are reasonable and non-prejudicial (as it appears others seem to have the same problem "understanding" you.)

However, as this line of thought has really nothing to do with practical solutions for abortion and continues to stray far from the intended topic I will refrain from making further comment to statements that are off track.

If you would like to open a seperate thread discussing your racial ideas please feel free to do so and I will be happy to engage you there, but for the purposes of this thread comments should be restricted to the OP.

In that spirit, what practical pro-life solutions do you have to offer?

Brighid
brighid is offline  
Old 06-02-2003, 12:24 PM   #59
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,199
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by brighid
In that spirit, what practical pro-life solutions do you have to offer?
Forgive me for dredging up a moldy oldy from the 70's, but the feminists had a point when they complained they were treated as sex objects. Problem is, many women get a sense of power over men from being treated that way. Nevertheless, if men were to refuse to play that game, the problem would be eliminated almost overnight.
yguy is offline  
Old 06-02-2003, 12:46 PM   #60
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: somewhere in the known Universe
Posts: 6,993
Default

Quote:
Forgive me for dredging up a moldy oldy from the 70's, but the feminists had a point when they complained they were treated as sex objects. Problem is, many women get a sense of power over men from being treated that way. Nevertheless, if men were to refuse to play that game, the problem would be eliminated almost overnight.
I really have no idea where you are trying to go with those statements, nor how those statements are applicable to "practicle" solutions from the pro-life segment of the population with regard to abortion. I also don't see the statements your previously made about blacks, et al as being in any way related to the feminism of the 70's.

Brighid
brighid is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:18 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.