![]()  | 
	
		Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#11 | |
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Apr 2001 
				Location: arse-end of the world 
				
				
					Posts: 2,305
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#12 | |
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Mar 2003 
				Location: Grand Junction CO 
				
				
					Posts: 2,231
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
  
		 | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#13 | |
| 
			
			 Regular Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: May 2002 
				Location: Bellevue, WA 
				
				
					Posts: 284
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 Reality is stranger than fiction... or is it?  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#14 | ||||
| 
			
			 Regular Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Oct 2001 
				Location: Sweden Stockholm 
				
				
					Posts: 233
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			 TO TOM SAWYER  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Quote: 
	
 Since everything in the quantum world is uncertain, we can only estimate the probable outcome of a measurement, where the quantum object can be found! Where the Eigenstate is as highest, there is the highest probability to find the electron too, and vice versa! The wave equation can be written down with either Heisenberg 's wave matrix, or Schrodinger 's wave mechanics! Quote: 
	
 Quote: 
	
 Not only does our measurement disturb the electron when we probe the quantum world with an electron microscope, since we hit the electron with photons, and thus disturb the electron, just as billiards players use the 8 balls in billiards to hit the black cue ball. We know thus the electrons position, but doesn't know anything about where the electron is going afterward???? Quote: 
	
 The Elegant Universe by Brian Greene Chap 4: Microscopic Weirdness If an electron is confined to a space of decreasing size, its motion (momentum) increases wildly due to "quantum claustrophobia" http://www.mcgoodwin.net/pages/elegantuniverse.html Soderqvist1: To use common sense in the quantum world is definitely the wrong place to do so, Take a look here what the founding fathers of quantum mechanics have to say about it! ![]() Quotations by Max Planck: If anybody says he can think about quantum problems without getting giddy, that only shows he has not understood the first thing about them. Quotations by Niels Bohr: Anyone who is not shocked by quantum theory has not understood it. Quotations by Erwin Schrodinger: [On quantum mechanics] I don't like it, and I'm sorry I ever had anything to do with it. Quotations by Werner Heisenberg: Since my talks with Bohr often continued till long after midnight and did not produce a satisfactory conclusion, both of us became utterly exhausted and rather tense. Thus, the more precisely the position is determined, the less precisely the momentum is known, and conversely. The "path" comes into existence only when we observe it. I think that modern physics has definitely decided in favor of Plato. In fact the smallest units of matter are not physical objects in the ordinary sense; they are forms, ideas which can be expressed unambiguously only in mathematical language. http://www.aip.org/history/heisenberg/p08c.htm Reference to some quotations http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~...eisenberg.html Soderqvist1: our common sense stems from our everyday living, therefore "quantum weirdness" transcends our notion of reality! :banghead:  | 
||||
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#15 | |||
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Apr 2001 
				Location: arse-end of the world 
				
				
					Posts: 2,305
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 Quote: 
	
 (BTW, you should always link to the abstract... http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0206196 ...rather than the full article) Quote: 
	
  
		 | 
|||
| 
		 | 
	
	
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
		
  |