FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-28-2003, 03:16 PM   #111
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,443
Default Re: Re: can't resist posting on this forum...

Quote:
Originally posted by Oxymoron
"Ooh! A sarcasm detector. What a useful invention that is".

Did I say there was anything wrong with meditation? (Hint: no). What I take issue with is pretending that prayer is anything more than meditation.
Alright...I apologize for being catty. You've been gracious enough to step back when others have taken offence, and I'll return in kind.

(Though I'm sure I've never seen any sarcasm anywhere else on these boards! (<--more sarcasm )

I also acknowledge that you didn't say there was anything wrong with meditation.
the_cave is offline  
Old 02-28-2003, 05:03 PM   #112
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: South Bend IN
Posts: 564
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by 99Percent
Unfortunately for you, the burden of a rational or empirical proof of god lies on the believer. It is in fact the theist who is always begging the question.
The question being addressed in this thread is the question of whether or not the idea of petitionary prayer, within the context of traditional theism, with the expectation that such may very well have causal relevance with respect to certain outcomes in the external world, is coherent. This question, in turn, is a focusing in on a particular issue in the context of a larger debate occurring on these boards as to whether Christian theism (and/or other traditional forms of theism) is rational. To dismiss any arguments for the coherence of the notion of petitionary prayer, as it has been described, on the grounds that any argument making reference to the concept of God is irrational, therefore, begs the question with respect to the context in which the discussion is taking place.

Also, if it is true that any argument which makes reference to the concept of God is irrational (as you seemed to be suggesting), then arguments against the coherence of the idea of petitionary prayer which make reference to the concept of God are also irrational. Furthermore, it is simply ridiculous to argue that when discussing the coherence of some notion, it is necessary to provide some sort of rational or empirical proof that said notion is true. The question of coherence and the question of truth are two distinct questions. We could very well establish that sting theory is coherent, for example, while still having no idea whether or not string theory is true.

Finally, I disagree with the assertion that the theist has some sort of greater burden of proof than the atheist. In fact, I think that both atheism and theism make equally sweeping, equally radical claims about reality. But that, of course, is part of the wider debate which I spoke of and one that I do not have time to get into now. And, as I have pointed out, it is in fact irrelevant with respect to the current issue being discussed.

God Bless,
Kenny
Kenny is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:13 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.