FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > Political Discussions, 2003-2007
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-31-2005, 12:28 PM   #131
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,777
Default

How is that relevant?
Jayhawker Soule is offline  
Old 01-31-2005, 02:14 PM   #132
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NewØZealand
Posts: 4,599
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ConsequentAtheist
How is that relevant?
It improves the completeness of the description of context given in the OP.
James T is offline  
Old 01-31-2005, 02:58 PM   #133
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Tethys Sea
Posts: 369
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ravon
Far be it from me to defend Sauron but I wonder Epictetus if you are not suffering from the same malice. Jimmy Higgins called it fair when he said that the trouble in the middle east is that people fail to understand that both sides can be wrong at the same time. I would add that both sides can be right at the same time. Its right, wouldn't you say, for both sides to want a homeland and wrong for either to fuck with the aspirations that each have for a homeland.

When I was in the middle east and met with palestinians I came to understand the depth of their desire to go home. It was every bit as strong as that which drove the Jewish people to come to Palestine. I remember standing on a hillside in 1967 with a palestinian family and they pointed out where they had lived across the valley. I was uncomfortable with their tears because for them to return would cost them their lives. When I ask Lauren to be real and you as well it is because of these experiences. I would never deny Israels right to exist but I agree with rlogan who points out that Israel is perpetrating the same kinds of horrors on the palestinians they experienced. I say that knowing that to a zionist that is the worst kind of blasphemy. But I ask how can that be alright?
This very well may be true. Palestinians are human beings with normal aspirations and hopes, just as Israelis are. Whose land is it? Whoever is in charge...in this case Israel. Israel does not hold as a primary goal the extermination of any Palestinian state. The same cannot be said of the Palestinians. I do not understand why the Palestinians don't simply accept that this is their de facto situation and work within it; i.e. work from within the Israeli state, not try to eliminate it. This refusal to accept an Israeli state is what sticks in the craw of the conservatives there.

The Mexicans knew that they couldn't fight the U.S. after the annexation of California. So, they became farm laborers, household servants, etc. and now they are the predominant ethnic group in California. Were they to organize, in a democracy, they could essentially "retake" California perfectly legally.
Epictetus is offline  
Old 01-31-2005, 03:07 PM   #134
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 32
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loren Pechtel
Hiroshima and Nagasaki weren't hit out of line with what happened to other cities. Had the bomb not existed they would have been hit as hard. It just would have taken thousands of planes.

Back then we didn't have the ability to be selective in our bombing, and besides, the Japanese war industry was mostly decentralized. There weren't point targets to be hit even if we could have hit them. To hit the industry meant hitting the city.
Sorry but you failed to answer my question. Were the inhabitants of Hiroshima and Nagasaki combatants? Yes or no?
Maurice is offline  
Old 01-31-2005, 03:27 PM   #135
Obsessed Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Not Mayaned
Posts: 96,752
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maurice
Sorry but you failed to answer my question. Were the inhabitants of Hiroshima and Nagasaki combatants? Yes or no?
The target was the war industry. Both cities had plenty of it.
Loren Pechtel is offline  
Old 01-31-2005, 03:34 PM   #136
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NewØZealand
Posts: 4,599
Default

To Loren
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maurice
Sorry but you failed to answer my question. Were the inhabitants of Hiroshima and Nagasaki combatants? Yes or no?
The answer was fairly obvious to me in Loren's post, which answered and expanded. My own view is similar to Loren's in this regard. The vast majority of the populace were non-combatants while being legitimate targets at the same time.

An interesting point is the timing of the bombs on Hiroshima and Ngasaki. I recall being told that were it not for the desire of the Japanese to retain the Emperor as a figurehead they had essentially capitulated at the time. I'd be interested to know the accuracy of that piece of hear-say.

Anyway, I'm sure you read the same answer to your question that I did in Loren's response. What is behind your question?

Edit: Oh dear was hiroshima necessary?, it would appear the hearsay understated the case.
James T is offline  
Old 01-31-2005, 04:33 PM   #137
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 32
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loren Pechtel
The target was the war industry. Both cities had plenty of it.
You are still not answering the question.
Will you be so kind as to answer my question?
Maurice is offline  
Old 01-31-2005, 05:02 PM   #138
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,098
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Epictetus
This very well may be true. Palestinians are human beings with normal aspirations and hopes, just as Israelis are. Whose land is it? Whoever is in charge...in this case Israel. Israel does not hold as a primary goal the extermination of any Palestinian state. The same cannot be said of the Palestinians. I do not understand why the Palestinians don't simply accept that this is their de facto situation and work within it; i.e. work from within the Israeli state, not try to eliminate it. This refusal to accept an Israeli state is what sticks in the craw of the conservatives there.

The Mexicans knew that they couldn't fight the U.S. after the annexation of California. So, they became farm laborers, household servants, etc. and now they are the predominant ethnic group in California. Were they to organize, in a democracy, they could essentially "retake" California perfectly legally.
So if I am understanding your point you are proposing that the Palestians should just accept that they have lost their homeland to the Israelis and that they should just resign themselves to living in peace in Israel and if they have enough children they can one day become the majority and retake the country peacefully. What an interesting proposal this is and how little it reflects reality. What about the palestinians in Jordan, lebonon, Egypt and elsewhere that Israel will not allow to return for this very reason. Your proposal is about might is right so if the palestinians have the power to destroy the israelis its ok. If a terrorist has the ability to take over a plane and crash it the people in the building should accept the inevitability of their death. Ouch my friend this arguement has no moral foundation.
Ravon is offline  
Old 01-31-2005, 05:40 PM   #139
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Tethys Sea
Posts: 369
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ravon
So if I am understanding your point you are proposing that the Palestians should just accept that they have lost their homeland to the Israelis and that they should just resign themselves to living in peace in Israel and if they have enough children they can one day become the majority and retake the country peacefully. What an interesting proposal this is and how little it reflects reality. What about the palestinians in Jordan, lebonon, Egypt and elsewhere that Israel will not allow to return for this very reason. Your proposal is about might is right so if the palestinians have the power to destroy the israelis its ok. If a terrorist has the ability to take over a plane and crash it the people in the building should accept the inevitability of their death. Ouch my friend this arguement has no moral foundation.
I'm not really concerned about a "moral foundation" where this issue is concerned. I'm just taking a stab at the two peoples living in relative peace without widespread slaughter which is what occurs presently. Israel has the upper hand. Palestinians want their land back. You can blow things and people up, but this will only stiffen resistance. Reform from within instead of fighting from without. Sometimes, it takes a generation or two to get the reform to be successful. Peaceful transition.

By the way, sometimes you must simply accept events outside of your control, such as riding in a plane that is crashing into a building. That doesn't mean you have to like it. But what are you gonna do?
Epictetus is offline  
Old 01-31-2005, 06:30 PM   #140
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,098
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Epictetus
I'm not really concerned about a "moral foundation" where this issue is concerned. I'm just taking a stab at the two peoples living in relative peace without widespread slaughter which is what occurs presently. Israel has the upper hand. Palestinians want their land back. You can blow things and people up, but this will only stiffen resistance. Reform from within instead of fighting from without. Sometimes, it takes a generation or two to get the reform to be successful. Peaceful transition.

By the way, sometimes you must simply accept events outside of your control, such as riding in a plane that is crashing into a building. That doesn't mean you have to like it. But what are you gonna do?
Well I do share your concern about the "wide spread slaughter" but perhaps you missed my point about Israel limiting the numbers of Palestinians who would wish to return home. Under your plan would they give up this asperation. And in return what do the Israelis give up or is it all on the Palestinians to accept whatever the Israelis give them. It is of course an unrealistic solution because neither side will offer that kind of unconditional surrender. :banghead:
Ravon is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:45 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.