Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
02-07-2003, 06:24 AM | #11 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 341
|
Quote:
I just wanted to make a point, and I still think they missed it. Oh well, it only was a 9-10 min conversation, so only so much could be said. Besides, it was cold outside.... |
|
02-07-2003, 06:43 AM | #12 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NCSU
Posts: 5,853
|
Wow you missed out, they had the month of May.
|
02-08-2003, 08:14 AM | #13 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: the peach state ga I am a metaphysical naturalist
Posts: 2,869
|
Re: Re: 2 xians tried to "win" me to god last night...
Quote:
as to the op, I generally enjoy being approached by xians, they are hardly ever prepared for an atheist who knows the bible. |
|
02-08-2003, 09:07 AM | #14 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 1,626
|
Re: 2 xians tried to "win" me to god last night...
Quote:
|
|
02-08-2003, 09:48 AM | #15 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,872
|
Quote:
I bet all but three older, wiser atheists here have the same belief system which inspired the above. "There ain't no sinners. Abortion is right. God murders babies. Homosexuality is natural There ain't no hell. Sex outside of marriage is okeydokey." Don't forget "Can I still believe Bush is a nutball? Can I still believe conservatives have wrecked the country forever and taken away all our freedoms? Can I believe the founders were all closet deists? Can I still believe in my pet evolutionary theory even if Darwin said it was impossible?" Well they're consistent about some things anyway. (Yawn) The irony is gonna kill me. Rad |
|
02-08-2003, 10:33 AM | #16 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Middletown, CT
Posts: 7,333
|
I'm not sure why you think that just by putting things into a hokey style of language it will suddenly seem like you're making a point.
In the first paragraph, all of the things mentioned are perfectly reasonable, and are the absence of belief, not a belief system. In the second paragraph, you exagerrate things way out of proportion. If that's not a strawman, I don't know what is. Do you ever actually read what the people write here? -B |
02-08-2003, 11:02 AM | #17 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
|
Radorth:
And they say atheists have no belief system. Nearly 100.000% of the convinced atheists in our society believe that the Earth is approximately spherical -- does that make belief in the Earth's sphericity a necessary part of atheism? I bet all but three older, wiser atheists here have the same belief system which inspired the above. "There ain't no sinners. Abortion is right. God murders babies. Homosexuality is natural There ain't no hell. Sex outside of marriage is okeydokey." If one believes that one's consciousness ends at death, then one believes that there can be no hell to go to after death. It's like how the roundness of the Earth makes irrelevant the question of what is beyond its edges, because a round object has no edges. As to "sin", I wonder what that is supposed to be. And how is being "older, wiser" supposed to make a big difference? Don't forget "Can I still believe Bush is a nutball? Can I still believe conservatives have wrecked the country forever and taken away all our freedoms? Can I believe the founders were all closet deists? Can I still believe in my pet evolutionary theory even if Darwin said it was impossible?" Radorth has never heard of Ayn Rand, it would seem; she had been a fervently pro-capitalist atheist. Also, whatever our Founding Fathers' religious beliefs had been, they had no intention of creating a state church, some official Church of God the American. (as in the belief that god is an American) And Charles Darwin never claimed that evolution was impossible. Radorth appears to be swallowing an out-of-context quote that creationists are fond of making; Darwin started out a discussion of the evolution of the eye by noting how seemingly impossible it may seem. Furthermore, despite his great achievements, Darwin is NOT considered an infallible prophet. Such a view is pure projection. |
02-08-2003, 02:57 PM | #18 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Boston
Posts: 699
|
Quote:
|
|
02-08-2003, 08:40 PM | #19 | |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Deployed to Kosovo
Posts: 4,314
|
Quote:
Oh, I forgot...you abandoned that discussion, now, didn't you? Claimed you won when, in reality, you put your tail between your legs and ran. And now, here you are, parroting that same old BS. That's pretty dishonest. But then again, so are the straw men - and you KNOW they're straw men - you're flinging around so carelessly here. |
|
02-09-2003, 09:26 AM | #20 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,872
|
Quote:
You'll hear it again, so keep trolling. Rad |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|