Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
05-11-2003, 08:55 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: hobart,tasmania
Posts: 551
|
Any photos.I would like to see the impression they make and compare them with what I have found.
|
05-11-2003, 09:12 AM | #12 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Louisville, KY, USA
Posts: 1,840
|
Quote:
Patrick |
|
05-11-2003, 09:42 AM | #13 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Louisville, KY, USA
Posts: 1,840
|
There are also raindrop prints in the Proterozoic age Chuar Group (according to Ford, in Beus and Morales, p. 59), and the Triassic Moenkopi Formation (Chronic, Roadside Geology of New Mexico, 1990, p. 195).
Patrick |
05-11-2003, 09:54 AM | #14 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 75
|
Here are some photos:
http://www.geocities.com/jghist/fossiltrace.htm - scroll down a bit http://www.psiaz.com/Schur/azpaleo/T...tr/p001361.jpg http://www.psiaz.com/Schur/azpaleo/T...tr/p001358.jpg Cheers |
05-11-2003, 10:21 AM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: hobart,tasmania
Posts: 551
|
sorry
By the size and definition of the fossils they don't appear to be rain drops. The first photo appeared to be caused by mud bubbles.
|
05-11-2003, 09:16 PM | #16 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Midwest
Posts: 41
|
I looked on the web and couldn't find any decent pictures either. I can't believe there aren't any good pictures of fossilized raindrops! At the Geo Dept. where I went to school we had several really cool (and obvious) fossilized raindrops. Sorry.
|
05-12-2003, 05:18 AM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: France
Posts: 715
|
I have seen some in-situ, and I have had a look on french web sites (look for "gouttes de pluie").
Here are the results: http://www.etab.ac-caen.fr/discip/ge...t/sac00049.jpg http://www.ac-nice.fr/svt/sorties/argens/gouttes.htm this one coming from this site: http://www.ac-nice.fr/svt/sorties/argens/arret5.htm which is not far from the place where these photos have been taken: http://www.ac-montpellier.fr/pedagog...ou/figures.htm I have personally seen the footprints of pre-mamalian reptiles which are on this last page, and it is where I have also seen fossils of raindrops |
05-12-2003, 06:37 AM | #18 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Louisville, KY, USA
Posts: 1,840
|
Re: sorry
Quote:
Patrick |
|
05-12-2003, 06:51 AM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: hobart,tasmania
Posts: 551
|
raindrops
The only way I can see them forming is in an arid area and then being covered by aeolian sediment.
|
05-12-2003, 07:34 AM | #20 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Louisville, KY, USA
Posts: 1,840
|
That's certainly the case with the Coconino Sandstone specimens. However, I can think of some ways for them to be buried by waterborne sediments as well. For instance, they could form in freshly deposited sediments on distal tidal flats, then the distal tidal flat could dry out and harden, then the pitted area could be buried by sediment when the tide reaches the distal flats once again. Certainly many fairly delicate trace fossils are preserved this way, so its at least possible for raindrop impressions to be preserved this way as well. I dont know of any examples in tidal deposits off the top of my head though
Patrick |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|