![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
![]() |
#61 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Eastern PNW
Posts: 572
|
![]() Quote:
Phantom Cows |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#62 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,886
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#63 |
Obsessed Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Not Mayaned
Posts: 96,752
|
![]()
Originally posted by excreationist
Loren Pechtel: What do you think of the different tax deductions there are, like Negative Gearing? "...It is through these available tax incentives that investors are able to purchase property at very little cost to themselves and in many cases at virtually no cost to themselves. Simply put: the tax man and the rental income pays for your investment property!!" Yeah, government likes to use tax as an incentive/punishment system. However, when you try to MIX that with it's use as a revenue system you get a total mess. If sold illegal, the shop would get $8 profit (assuming 5% discount is enough to sell things) rather than $5 profit, which is a 60% increase in profit. If the penalty for not paying GST was huge, it would be better for businesses, especially larger ones, to do things legitimately. Actually, the size of the punishment isn't nearly as much of an issue as the chance of punishment. Consider this case under a VAT system: The store is issued more 1099's than normal for it's reported revenue. Big tipoff to the taxman that something's wrong. |
![]() |
![]() |
#64 | |
Obsessed Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Not Mayaned
Posts: 96,752
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#65 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 15,576
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#66 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 15,576
|
![]() Quote:
http://www.williamcooper.com/biggestheist.html Tell me what you think |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#67 | |
Obsessed Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Not Mayaned
Posts: 96,752
|
![]() Quote:
As for increasing the number of deductions on the W4, you can. It gives you more money up front but if they aren't justified you get a big tax bill in april and possibly underpayment penalties. Some years ago we had an employee in the accountant's office actually crying because he had done that. He bought a house. Now, "everyone" knows that when you buy a house you have more deductions and pay less tax. (Never mind that the average person gets little from this and many get nothing at all.) He increased his exemptions from 1 to 3. April comes around--and he owes the IRS several hundered dollars. Money he doesn't have. He was actually threatening to sue us because supposedly we had misreported his income to the IRS, otherwise there would be no way he would have that tax bill. I was worried that he was actually going to attack the accountant! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#68 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 15,576
|
![]() Quote:
What do you think about my plan? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#69 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 15,576
|
![]() Quote:
Also, I need to make sure we're talking about the right figure...the allowances/deductions/exemptions. I always get the terms confused. Also again, why would my HR dept be nonresponsive about my question of "how would I increase my deductions/allowances/exemptions on the W-4 (whichever one it may be?) They did say that over a certain amount, they have to inform the IRS, which doesn't make me any difference. They told me that they prefer to have you pay according to what you're allowing by them (how condescending) rather than have you claim more than your expected total (did I mention I'm single with no kids...they ran this down on me since I have no spouse). I translate this into they don't want me to do what I intend! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#70 | |
Obsessed Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Not Mayaned
Posts: 96,752
|
![]() Quote:
The W-4's of my wife and I have only one thing on them that's reality and that's because the IRS put a box for it (~"Married but withold at the single rate"). It's what makes the numbers come out right--the system doesn't work right for dual-earner couples. Note that some HR departments give you a copy of the front of the W-4 rather than the whole thing. There's a whole page of stuff on the back for figuring out what to do with unusual situations. |
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|