FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-06-2002, 08:41 PM   #31
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: New Durham, NH USA
Posts: 5,933
Post

wordsmyth:
Quote:
Without time nothing would change, so our senses tell us that time is not an illusion. We track time using clocks and calendars, but we observe time based on change both in ourselves and the environment around us.
Things/events change regardless of the perception of time.

Time is an abstract concept/principle. It requires a perceiving being. If there is no perceiving being then things/events continue through causality to occur in sequences wherein things/events as causes cause/create things/events as effects, which become new causes, ... etc.

Time as we observe when men are ‘doing time’ requires a means of measurement, which has to be a time-interval, so men can measure the time-intervals between/among the occurrences of events in sequences and thereby be able to answer by how much time [how many time intervals] did A occur before B, etc.

If a time-interval is variable because its clock is subject to changes of velocity/gravity then the measurement of time varies and is inaccurate compared to a clock whose time-interval is invariable and is therefore measuring Absolute Time.

Variable time-interval clocks produce an illusion of time as spacetime compared to invariable time-interval clocks, which separate space and time and destroy the illusion of time as spacetime.
Bob K is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:32 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.