FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Secular Community Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 02:40 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-11-2003, 09:06 AM   #21
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Dallas
Posts: 4,351
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by AdamSmith
No it wasn't directed just to you.
I'm just paranoid.

Quote:
I have DSL with PPPoE on a Mac OSX ,OS9, Linux, BSD, Win98/NT/2000/XP
Well you sound like a pretty tech savvy guy/gal, so of course it's possible to get it running on those systems.

Just so I can stop the mac people before they bash my head in... The main problem with using os9.x and before is the extensions system. And the fact that macpoet(the most common type of pppoe connectivity for mac) reports vague errors that give you no idea of what the actual problem is.

Add to that, that mac9.x and before do not come with any pinging software, making it next to impossible to test the NIC card, and modem etc. (thank god osX does)

Nothing makes a tech bang his head on the wall harder, then a caller using an earlier mac os with error ID 6. :banghead:

Quote:
Cable is eventually going to cap total badwidth and then charge you for anything over that.
I've heard of this happening, but I honestly doubt it would go through. Consumers would riot.

Quote:
Perhaps your equipment is setup to do it the Microsoft way and not following the standard.
Say that again to my face, punk!

Quote:
You need filters for cable if you have cable internet and digital cable. The upstream data frequency harmonics can play havoic with some digital cable boxes.
Isn't that what the splitter is supposed to do?
AquaVita is offline  
Old 02-11-2003, 09:16 AM   #22
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: .
Posts: 1,281
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by AquaVita
Isn't that what the splitter is supposed to do?
A splitter usually splits the line allowing full spectrum out the two ends like a fork in the road. Then you need a filter from the splitter to the cable box. I guess they could have splitters with the filter in one device though.
Kinross is offline  
Old 02-11-2003, 10:26 AM   #23
Obsessed Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Not Mayaned
Posts: 96,752
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Philosoft
You seem to have done your homework on DSL. I, for one, would be interested to see what you have to say about satellite.
Well, I've had experience with satellite. 800ms ping. Fine for large stuff but for small stuff (and most pages are made of a bunch of small stuff) it could easily be worse than dialup. Also, terrible performance when dealing with e-mail. Setting IE's timeout to the 5 minute max wasn't always enough to download e-maiils in the meg range.
Loren Pechtel is offline  
Old 02-11-2003, 10:33 AM   #24
Obsessed Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Not Mayaned
Posts: 96,752
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by AdamSmith
DSL requires requires filters and spliters for the lines. Cable also requires filters and spliters as well.

I then switched to cable internet but didn't have cable TV. This completly confused them and they thought I was stealing cable TV and the serviceman would pull my cable. I would then be out a week without internet until the serviceman came to reconnect me. this happened six times.
Cable internet here, no splitters other than the normal splitters used for coax and no filters in the house. No cable tv at present although it was active for a short while. (A moron at the cable company called to point out that by having both cable tv and cable internet you got $10/month off the bill--even when it was limited basic service at $9.70/month. When the next bill showed up and his lie was exposed--the discount only applied to expanded basic or better--I yapped and had the cable tv disconnected and the errant charge knocked off the bill.) There is a filter out under the sidewalk but it's not something I need to be concerned about.
When the initial installation was done the installer forgot that filter--had it worked we would have had cable tv in the house. However, there was a bad wire they had to replace, the tech who did that hooked it up correctly.
Loren Pechtel is offline  
Old 02-11-2003, 10:35 AM   #25
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Twin Cities, USA
Posts: 3,197
Default

Sorry if this question was answered in the above posts, but I'm not a scientific/technology-enhanced sort of person, and I was just blinded by the brilliance .

Why is it that DSL is so much more expensive than cable? Here in my city, it's a full $24 more per month.
Bree is offline  
Old 02-11-2003, 10:47 AM   #26
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Dallas
Posts: 4,351
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Bree
Why is it that DSL is so much more expensive than cable? Here in my city, it's a full $24 more per month.

Hello Bree!

One reason that DSL is so much more, is that there are often so many more middle men, as I mentioned earlier. The more cooks in the soup, the more you pay.

Plus there is a lot more physical equipment involved with a DSL connection, which also contributes to the cost.
AquaVita is offline  
Old 02-11-2003, 10:48 AM   #27
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: U.S.
Posts: 4,171
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by AdamSmith

DSL can offer 1500/1500 down to 384/128 and anything in between depending on the flavor of DSL and your distance from the office.
This is very important. If you are long way from the phone central office your speed may suck rocks and if you are close it may rock.

It doesn't matter for me because I am in one of those lucky "fiber to the curb" areas so that my DSL isn't on copper. It's like being next door to the central office.

DC
Rusting Car Bumper is offline  
Old 02-11-2003, 11:50 AM   #28
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: San Francisco, CA USA
Posts: 3,568
Default

Quote:
I'm not bashing it because I hate it, I'm bashing it because I deal with internet connections every day here at work, and I'm telling you what real world experience has told me regarding it.
Wasn't directed at you specifically, just the general sentiment here. It was surprising to me, given that I've consistently had nothing but a good experience with DSL, and have consistently watched others with their cable modem woes.
Quote:
Well first of all, multiple phones lines does not affect DSL. Only devices on the same line as the DSL will affect it.
Oops, I meant that I have a single phone line with multiple extensions. My house has a second phone line, but I don't use it.

Quote:
Great! I'm always glad to hear someone have an easy transition to get away from narrowband, reagardless of platform. But you should consider yourself very lucky to have had no problems!
Thanks! And I do consider myself lucky, but not because it's DSL, simply that it's a utility in general, and any utility can potentially cause major headaches. Hell, (and I'm not using this as a point to ding cable modems), I've had nothing but trouble in the past four years with AT&T Digital Cable. And I routinely have problems with Web-hosting ISPs.

Quote:
Sounds like he's missing a step somewhere. It is not that difficult to network a cable internet connection.
It's possible, but unlikely. In general, he really knows what he's doing; hell, he's a telecom consultant.
DarkBronzePlant is offline  
Old 02-11-2003, 12:00 PM   #29
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 122
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by DigitalChicken
This is very important. If you are long way from the phone central office your speed may suck rocks and if you are close it may rock.

It doesn't matter for me because I am in one of those lucky "fiber to the curb" areas so that my DSL isn't on copper. It's like being next door to the central office.

DC
My house is actually just on the outside of the service range, so our connection tends to come and go. When it works, it's awesome, but like someone mentioned, when there's a problem it really sucks. Still, compared to the horrible dial-up speeds, it's a lot better. We can't get cable out where we are, so DSL is as good as it gets.
Rosiel is offline  
Old 02-11-2003, 06:39 PM   #30
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
Posts: 5,814
Default

ok, thanks for the feedback. of course it's a lot different here, as the cable services are much more problem-ridden.

another question, opinions on the difference between USB and Ethernet dsl modems? i've ordered a USB, because up until now i've been unable to network this PC because the cable modem took up the only port. will USB reduce speed noticibly?
kwigibo is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:26 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.