![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
|
|
#21 | |||||
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Dallas
Posts: 4,351
|
Quote:
![]() Quote:
Just so I can stop the mac people before they bash my head in... The main problem with using os9.x and before is the extensions system. And the fact that macpoet(the most common type of pppoe connectivity for mac) reports vague errors that give you no idea of what the actual problem is. Add to that, that mac9.x and before do not come with any pinging software, making it next to impossible to test the NIC card, and modem etc. (thank god osX does) Nothing makes a tech bang his head on the wall harder, then a caller using an earlier mac os with error ID 6. :banghead: Quote:
Quote:
![]() Quote:
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: .
Posts: 1,281
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Obsessed Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Not Mayaned
Posts: 96,752
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Obsessed Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Not Mayaned
Posts: 96,752
|
Quote:
When the initial installation was done the installer forgot that filter--had it worked we would have had cable tv in the house. However, there was a bad wire they had to replace, the tech who did that hooked it up correctly. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Twin Cities, USA
Posts: 3,197
|
Sorry if this question was answered in the above posts, but I'm not a scientific/technology-enhanced sort of person, and I was just blinded by the brilliance
.Why is it that DSL is so much more expensive than cable? Here in my city, it's a full $24 more per month. |
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Dallas
Posts: 4,351
|
Quote:
Hello Bree! One reason that DSL is so much more, is that there are often so many more middle men, as I mentioned earlier. The more cooks in the soup, the more you pay. Plus there is a lot more physical equipment involved with a DSL connection, which also contributes to the cost. |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: U.S.
Posts: 4,171
|
Quote:
It doesn't matter for me because I am in one of those lucky "fiber to the curb" areas so that my DSL isn't on copper. It's like being next door to the central office. ![]() DC |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | ||||
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: San Francisco, CA USA
Posts: 3,568
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
And I do consider myself lucky, but not because it's DSL, simply that it's a utility in general, and any utility can potentially cause major headaches. Hell, (and I'm not using this as a point to ding cable modems), I've had nothing but trouble in the past four years with AT&T Digital Cable. And I routinely have problems with Web-hosting ISPs.Quote:
|
||||
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 122
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
Posts: 5,814
|
ok, thanks for the feedback. of course it's a lot different here, as the cable services are much more problem-ridden.
another question, opinions on the difference between USB and Ethernet dsl modems? i've ordered a USB, because up until now i've been unable to network this PC because the cable modem took up the only port. will USB reduce speed noticibly? |
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|