FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Secular Community Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 02:40 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-11-2003, 09:11 AM   #51
JCS
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: right over there
Posts: 753
Default

Quote:
Sorry but this just sounds like the bitter old man syndrome. I'm not calling you a bitter old man, but that's exactly what you sound like.
If we are going in that direction than your point sounds like "it takes a village to raise a child". Sorry but my parenting days are over. If you need a babysitter run an add.

Quote:
As I said in a previous post...if you want to make a difference, then find a better way to do it then confusing children.
So it is my fault you put your child in an organization that has a policy that may result in a confused child. Yeah ok.
JCS is offline  
Old 03-11-2003, 09:11 AM   #52
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default

Already did, you must have missed it.

Yes, I did miss why you're lecturing a child about something he doesn't understand and has no control over, rather than taking action that might actually do some good.

The way to change the situation is public pressure at the organization level.
Mageth is offline  
Old 03-11-2003, 09:11 AM   #53
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Dallas
Posts: 4,351
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by christ-on-a-stick

I made a simple 2 sentence statement in a perfectly calm and polite normal-tone-of-voice.

I did not *discuss* atheism or sexuality with the girl, I did not *lecture* the girl on atheist or sexuality, and I certainly didn't "rant and rave".


The little girl probably only understood (and barely)these things...

1. as a....bisexual,

2. ...serious issues with the Girl and Boys Scout's

3. ....gays and lesbians".

And she also knows she feels rejected because you were "mean" and didn't want any cookies.

Please folks...bear with me. Think like she would. We are talking about children.
AquaVita is offline  
Old 03-11-2003, 09:15 AM   #54
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: St. Louis, MO area
Posts: 1,924
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by AquaVita
Ok let's assume that I had come to your door and you had done this to me.

You: ~above quote~
Me: Whatever dude.

And this is when I was about 10 or so...it would have been confusing and strange to me, but you would not have changed anything.

If you really want to make progress..don't sit around your house and preach to them when they come to your door. Go out and participate in the channels that will actually make a difference.
Why do you assume I don't "go out and participate in the channels that will actually make a difference"? First off, what channel do you think are "appropriate"?

Second, I am very active in a local atheist/agnostic/freethinker group. For about the last 3 years, I have participated in a discussion on a local college campus about religious viewpoints - I speak as an atheist - other speakers include agnostic, muslim, hindu, and a variety of Christian denominations. I have actively pursued similar venues in highschools, but with no luck so far (either they are not having a general table discussion of world religions, or I simply am not yet getting in touch with the right people). I am active in a local ethics group, which I got involved in because I wanted to make sure that the assumption was not made that "religious = ethical" or "ethical = religious". I am one of the few people that will stop for cars having trouble on the roadside. I have a darwin fish on my trunk - I make it a point to stop in front of the car having trouble. I even stand up and defend the rights of the religious to have their religion - an absolute necessity after Sept 11, 2001, when a portion of the population was grouping all Muslims as terrorists.

Do any of the above meet with your approval?

Simian
simian is offline  
Old 03-11-2003, 09:16 AM   #55
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Dallas
Posts: 4,351
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by JCS

So it is my fault you put your child in an organization that has a policy that may result in a confused child. Yeah ok.

No...it is the preaching you feel you have the right to do that results in a confused child.
AquaVita is offline  
Old 03-11-2003, 09:17 AM   #56
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Dallas
Posts: 4,351
Default

Simian...I didn't ask for a resume. I can appreciate the things you do for the freethough community. But the fact remains that preaching to children simply trying to raise money for a fun organization, is not one of them.
AquaVita is offline  
Old 03-11-2003, 09:24 AM   #57
JCS
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: right over there
Posts: 753
Default

Quote:
And you could explain why you harangued the child about something they are "not able to understand", and have no control over, instead of discussing it with the press, the parents, or the organization, where it would be more effective.
Yeah I really jump on them when they ring the bell.

(knock-Knock) Sir I'm with the BS selling bars for my troup.

Sorry I don't support organizations that support discrimination. good day.

And the totally traumatized child moves on to the next door, while mom and dad phone the cops due to the unprovoked attack on their offspring.

If the parents want to discuss this with me why aren't they knocking on my door instead of their kid. It ain't my discriminatory. policy, and I have every right to refuse and state the reason for that refusal no matter how much you argue.
JCS is offline  
Old 03-11-2003, 09:26 AM   #58
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Dallas
Posts: 4,351
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by JCS
Sorry I don't support organizations that support discrimination. good day.


This is the first I've seen you indicate a rational response. I would have no problem if someone told my child something so relatively straightfoward and basic. He may ask me about it later, and I would be glad to talk to him about what you probably meant.
AquaVita is offline  
Old 03-11-2003, 09:28 AM   #59
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Broomfield, Colorado, USA
Posts: 5,550
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by AquaVita
Oh please. How many times as a kid would you not even read these types of signs. Again I say...these are CHILDREN. We expect more from adults, but many times children simply forget to pay this much attention.
I sold girl scout cookies exactly once as a kid, and I obeyed all posted signs. I was a very well-behaved child, and my parents cautioned me beforehand to be polite and not to bother people who didn't want to be bothered.

I never allowed my son to sell door to door, until he got a job a few years ago with a local newspaper. He was fourteen or thereabouts at the time, and yes, I fully expected him to be aware of and obey No Soliciting signs. If he had ignored that sort of thing, I would have punished him, not the person he'd bothered.

If your child cannot be trusted to behave appropriately, they should not be out alone.

Quote:

How is that in ANY way related to what we're discussing? In the case you mentioned...the child is doing somethng they should know is wrong. They are damaging property and acting foolish. How is that in any way related?
It doesn't damage a rock to mindlessly kick it around. And in fact, it's less disruptive to me personally to have to move rocks back into place than it is to be interrupted in the middle of something in order to get the door for someone trying to sell me something I don't want or need.

It's a violation of someone's privacy and their polite request to be left alone. It is rude to disturb someone in their home or going about their daily business, and there are repercussions for rudeness.

This whole "it takes a village" concept is a two-way street. If you expect the 'village' to help raise your child, you're just going to have to accept that people are sometimes going to point out your child's transgressions.
lisarea is offline  
Old 03-11-2003, 09:29 AM   #60
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default

I agree with AquaVita on that one. I have no problem with that response.
Mageth is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:44 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.