FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB General Discussion Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-30-2003, 10:38 AM   #21
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 1,066
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Loren Pechtel
The razor wire wouldn't cause me one bit of trouble--I would just walk where the tank had smashed it. It's not like they only have infantry.

Furthermore, razor wire is only one line and they know where it is. It doesn't slow them down otherwise. Land mines make a field that slows them down much more for the entire duration of their passage over it.

As for shooting at the guys crossing the wire--there would be a *LOT* of guns supporting such a crossing. You won't get off many shots.
Land mines, however, can't be suppressed like that. Paths can be cleared by things like a bangalore torpedo but that's slow--and while you're doing it you're duck soup for artillery (airburst fuzed it won't do too much to the minefield.)
Course if the enemy knew you were coming, which they would because tanks aren't exactly stealth, couldn't they just launch anti-tank helicopters or ground based defenses? Since Korea's DMZs' is what's keeping us from signing on, or so we say, aren't there better means to defend it?
slept2long is offline  
Old 01-30-2003, 10:40 AM   #22
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 1,066
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by echidna
Built-in expiry dates seem the simplest way to minimise long-term �collateral damage� from landmines. Typically tactical mines would have shorter expiry dates than strategic landmines. I don�t see much preventing this, other than dollars of course.
That sounds like a good idea. Or maybe make them electronically triggerable/deactivatable.
slept2long is offline  
Old 01-30-2003, 10:44 AM   #23
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 1,066
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by elwoodblues
Are the proponents of landmine regulation here willing to endorse an exception for landmines along the N Korea/S Korea border? Given that much, I'd happily sign on to it.
Perhaps an exemption would help this along but I wonder if giving an exemption for that DMZ is an effort toward solving the problem of landmines
while continuing the problems of North and South Korea. While the rest of the world is moving ahead these two are at each others throats like animals. Not a good example of comprimise If I do say so myself.
slept2long is offline  
Old 01-30-2003, 10:47 AM   #24
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 1,066
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Loren Pechtel
Rules that have specific exemptions in them like this are generally a bad idea.

Rather, they should be permitted in clearly marked fields which are to be cleaned up by the party who laid them after the conflict is over. The borders of such fields must be filed with the UN within one month of their laying, as well as information as to in general what sort of mines were used.
Loren your idea is a good one as long as there are no exeptions and harsh penalties. Otherwise it may be just another toothless international rule for the U.S. to molest.
slept2long is offline  
Old 01-30-2003, 10:55 AM   #25
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 1,066
Default

Coleman,I ain't gonna argue with you 'cause I can sense the futility of such in your post. I do wonder how you feel about clearing the fields you laid or laying them more carefully. Should those who lay mines clean them up when they are no longer useful? Do you think this policy would encourage people to find alternatives to mines instead of having to clean them up or do you think people might just make excuses to keep forces in need of mine defense in the area longer.
slept2long is offline  
Old 01-30-2003, 12:04 PM   #26
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portsmouth, England
Posts: 4,652
Default

Could we add "cleaned up by the layers OR the winners", I somehow can't see dead people clearing mines!

Amen-Moses
Amen-Moses is offline  
Old 01-30-2003, 01:31 PM   #27
Obsessed Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Not Mayaned
Posts: 96,752
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Ut
Actually, I'm quite surprised military companies aren't lobbying hard on that one. It would ensure them of a higher volume of sale and they could probably justify charging a higher price per unit. And it could give them a PR boost needed to prevent this segment of their business from disappearing.
Mines aren't normally scooped up and reused anyway, thus they wouldn't gain much.

Good safeties have to destroy the mine after the time has passed so as to not leave explosives that will age and become unstable. Thus the clock won't be started until the mine is emplaced and armed. Again, no benefit for the builders.
Loren Pechtel is offline  
Old 01-30-2003, 01:33 PM   #28
Obsessed Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Not Mayaned
Posts: 96,752
Default

Originally posted by slept2long
So currently we lay out mine fields strategically and chart them all. Do we still just drop them outta planes where charting them is impossible? I am wndering to what effect the U.S.'s use of them has been changed in recent maybe not so recent years.


The only place we currently use minefields is the DMZ.

I could see there worth when a few people need to defend against a greater number of soldiers but when they are simply used to mark off a permanent border, the DMZ seems to fit that description, wouldn't a wall be better?

A wall is going to make one bit of difference?!?! How long is it going to last against tanks? Or even satchel charges?

Interesting information Lamma. We agree that leaving them behind is unacceptable. I wonder if the U.S. has tried to look for alternatives and if we've found any?

Simple--don't leave them behind! Chart your fields and clean them up when you are done.
Loren Pechtel is offline  
Old 01-30-2003, 01:47 PM   #29
Obsessed Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Not Mayaned
Posts: 96,752
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by slept2long
Course if the enemy knew you were coming, which they would because tanks aren't exactly stealth, couldn't they just launch anti-tank helicopters or ground based defenses? Since Korea's DMZs' is what's keeping us from signing on, or so we say, aren't there better means to defend it?
The point of minefields is to slow down the enemy. That's the whole point of our defense on the DMZ--slow down NK so we have time to get enough force over there to stop them.

As for anti-tank helicopters--it's an area under the SAM umbrella of the north. Choppers better not stick their head above a hill until the SAM's have been knocked out--and by then you've been overrun. The Hellfires will get some but not enough to make much difference. Also, the number of spots to fire from will be limited (the only way to survive against the SAM's is to peek over a hill) and the range of 8" artillery exceeds the range of the Hellfire. That could make life mighty unpleasant for the choppers--the NK's would know the terrain and could fuse the shells to go off near the choppers.

As for ground based defenses--they'll do very little. While they are hardened enough the artillery bombardment won't kill too many they won't be in a position to stick their heads up to fire. Artillery is very effective at making infantry keep it's heads down. VT fused they can keep firing until the defending bunkers are overrun by the tanks.
Loren Pechtel is offline  
Old 01-30-2003, 01:49 PM   #30
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portsmouth, England
Posts: 4,652
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Loren Pechtel
The only place we currently use minefields is the DMZ.
Define "currently", we littered Iraq with the damn things and never made any attempt to go and clean them up!

(btw people here do know what airfield denial weapons do don't they?)

Amen-Moses
Amen-Moses is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:52 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.