Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
04-16-2003, 06:40 PM | #91 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
He already did.
Evidence, please? Real, tangible evidence that god created anything? Or is that too much to ask? And if he did it before, why can't he do it again as a demonstration? Heck, I might even believe in him if he'd do that. |
04-16-2003, 06:43 PM | #92 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: East Coast. Australia.
Posts: 5,455
|
Quote:
|
|
04-16-2003, 06:43 PM | #93 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
I think that's preposterous, considering how pathetic our focussed efforts to produce AI have been. Why would anyone think happenstance would generate it?
Argument from ignorance, pure and simple. Does your argument truly boil down to "It doesn't make sense to me" and "We haven't been able to generate AI yet, therefore it's preposterous to think that intelligence is an emergent property of the universe?" Pathetic, absolutely pathetic. |
04-16-2003, 06:48 PM | #94 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
This is intellectual presumption beyond belief. You think you understand gravity because you know some of its effects, which is like thinking you understand cars because you can drive one.
He didn't mention gravity at all. Whether we understand gravity or not says nothing about how complex the underlying principles of gravity are. I suspect they're quite simple. |
04-16-2003, 06:49 PM | #95 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
Happenstance could not create it. Evolution is not happenstance. This is important.
Indeed it is. |
04-16-2003, 06:53 PM | #96 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,199
|
Quote:
|
|
04-16-2003, 06:59 PM | #97 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,199
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
04-16-2003, 07:02 PM | #98 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,199
|
Quote:
|
|
04-16-2003, 07:33 PM | #99 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: East Coast. Australia.
Posts: 5,455
|
Quote:
|
|
04-16-2003, 07:35 PM | #100 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
Swell. When you KNOW they're quite simple, get back to me.
Until then you're going to assume they're complex, I guess. :banghead: Until you provide some evidence that intelligence could arise from mere complexity, how is your own position based on anything but ignorant speculation? You sure like the argument from ignorance, don't you? I humbly submit myself as evidence that intelligence is an emergent phenomenon of the universe. Of course, in light of much of the human race and their superstitious ideas of an even greater intelligence that somehow just "is" or has to be because "I just can't understand how all this neat stuff came from nothin'", I may be wrong about intelligence even being present in the universe. So far the only reason you've given to believe intelligence is a naturally occurring product of complexity is your apparent belief that it could. And the fact that intelligence arguably exists in the universe, and the best hypothesis we have for it getting here, IMO, is as an emergent property of the universe (I don't believe in gods and such, remember?) And I'm arguing against what - your apparent belief that it couldn't. I've seen you post nothing that indicates intelligence coudn't be an emergent property of the universe. And this from the poster who earlier posted "Not even close, because it doesn't make sense to me." |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|