FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-11-2003, 02:51 PM   #71
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,443
Default

I don't understand the claim that one has to fall into the four categories listed in the OP, or that a mythical Jesus is equvalent to the gospels being "myths in totality", or that mythical histories cannot be histories, nor can they reflect actual events. It just seems like simple-mindedness to me.

If I tell an embellished story about a friend of mine, which has a structure similar to the actual events, but with many fabricated details, have I told a myth?

If so, what, then, would distinguish such a story from a story I invented entirely, about someone who didn't exist?

Surely there is a distinction. And it's not being made here.

I myself fall into none of the four categories (am I to now be told that I am having an impossible thought?).

Clearly mythical imagination can work upon historical facts and produce a narrative that is a representation of both myth and reality.

Duh?
the_cave is offline  
Old 04-11-2003, 11:20 PM   #72
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: ""
Posts: 3,863
Default

Quote:
If I tell an embellished story about a friend of mine, which has a structure similar to the actual events, but with many fabricated details, have I told a myth?
The story, as you have described it, would be a myth.
As I explained earlier, horns do exist. Horses do exist. Put a horn on a horse. You get a unicorn.
Unicorns do not exist.

So your story would be part fiction, part factual. But in its totality, it would be a myth.

Quote:
If so, what, then, would distinguish such a story from a story I invented entirely, about someone who didn't exist?
Myth too.

You either choose to talk about a story, or part of a story.

Quote:
Surely there is a distinction. And it's not being made here.
Yes there is.

Quote:
I myself fall into none of the four categories (am I to now be told that I am having an impossible thought?).
On the contrary. Your thoughts are beautiful.

Quote:
Clearly mythical imagination can work upon historical facts and produce a narrative that is a representation of both myth and reality.
Indeed
Ted Hoffman is offline  
Old 04-11-2003, 11:46 PM   #73
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: ""
Posts: 3,863
Default

bedrock facts about Robin Hood that are beyond dispute.

In the time of Richard the Lionheart a minor noble of Nottinghamshire, one Robin of Loxley, was outlawed for poaching deer.

So Robin took to the greenwood of Sherwood Forest, making a living by stealing from rich travellers and distributing the loot among the poor of the area.

He got a band of followers (the Merry men) and a spouse, Maid Marian he had friends like Little John and Friar Tuck.

He won the archery contest set up by the Sheriff of Nottingham

He lived in the thirteenth century. The earlist writing about him is by William Langland's "The vision of William concerning Piers Plowman" which was written in 1377.

He lived/dwelt in Sherwood forest which stretches over 30 miles from Nottingham to Worksop.

Robin journeyed to Kirklees Priory where he was eventually killed by his cousin the prioress and Sir Roger of Doncaster.
Ted Hoffman is offline  
Old 04-12-2003, 07:23 AM   #74
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Waterbury, Ct, Usa
Posts: 6,523
Default

What does Robin Hood have to do with Jesus?
Vinnie is offline  
Old 04-12-2003, 05:34 PM   #75
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ca., USA
Posts: 283
Default Re: Poll: Are you a HJer, JMer, or agnostic on the issue?

Quote:
Originally posted by IronMonkey


Now I would like you to post your position. Only four options are available
abstain
agnostic
Jesus Myther
Historical Jesus

For the uninitiated, Jesus Mythers are those that believe that the Jesus of the Gospels never existed as he is portrayed therein and was an entirely mythical saviour figure like Attis/Horus/Osiris.
ad.

Let the polls begin!
I definitely come down on the side of Jesus as myth. I would actually state it much more strongly, and say Jesus as lie.
Unbeliever is offline  
Old 04-12-2003, 06:54 PM   #76
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: PA USA
Posts: 5,039
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Vinnie
What does Robin Hood have to do with Jesus?
Bedrock facts about the Titan:

Sank when it struck an iceberg in fog while steaming from New York to Liverpool in the Northern Lanes of the Atlantic at a speed of 25 knots.

Passenger manifest of two thousand.

"...eight hundred feet long, of seventy thousand tons displacement, seventy-five thousand horse-power, and on her trial trip had steamed at a rate of twenty-five knots an hour over the bottom, in the face of unconsidered winds, tides, and currents..."

cork jackets, insufficient lifeboats...

"John Rowland, sailor of the Titan, with child passenger, name unknown, on board Peerless, Bath, at Christiansand, Norway. Both dangerously ill. Rowland speaks of ship cut in half night before loss of Titan."

Gibraltar

Lloyds of London

etc.

And plenty of embarrassing testimony which would never have been knowingly included, hence its obvious historicity.

Vin,

I thought you were going to produce something different, maybe a new argument.

Fiction is fiction, as others have stated. With fiction, however, we generally know what's historical about a given work and what isn't. Short of that, I don't know any method of separating one from the other, and that's the problem with the protagonist of the gospels.

We can take parts of the Titan and sink them for obvious reasons, such as the episode of a drugged and injured man having a knife fight with a hungry polar bear on the iceberg that destroyed his ship, while protecting a toddler from certain death, but its a seamy and subjective business. Look at this episode in another two-thousand years, when maybe polar bears are extinct and we possess little info and zero personal experience with them, and maybe it gets less silly, maybe even believable.

Thanks, though.

joe
joedad is offline  
Old 04-12-2003, 07:37 PM   #77
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Waterbury, Ct, Usa
Posts: 6,523
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by joedad
Bedrock facts about the Titan:

Sank when it struck an iceberg in fog while steaming from New York to Liverpool in the Northern Lanes of the Atlantic at a speed of 25 knots.

Passenger manifest of two thousand.

"...eight hundred feet long, of seventy thousand tons displacement, seventy-five thousand horse-power, and on her trial trip had steamed at a rate of twenty-five knots an hour over the bottom, in the face of unconsidered winds, tides, and currents..."

cork jackets, insufficient lifeboats...

"John Rowland, sailor of the Titan, with child passenger, name unknown, on board Peerless, Bath, at Christiansand, Norway. Both dangerously ill. Rowland speaks of ship cut in half night before loss of Titan."

Gibraltar

Lloyds of London

etc.

And plenty of embarrassing testimony which would never have been knowingly included, hence its obvious historicity.

Vin,

I thought you were going to produce something different, maybe a new argument.

Fiction is fiction, as others have stated. With fiction, however, we generally know what's historical about a given work and what isn't. Short of that, I don't know any method of separating one from the other, and that's the problem with the protagonist of the gospels.

We can take parts of the Titan and sink them for obvious reasons, such as the episode of a drugged and injured man having a knife fight with a hungry polar bear on the iceberg that destroyed his ship, while protecting a toddler from certain death, but its a seamy and subjective business. Look at this episode in another two-thousand years, when maybe polar bears are extinct and we possess little info and zero personal experience with them, and maybe it gets less silly, maybe even believable.

Thanks, though.

joe
What does anything you said have to do with the historicity of Jesus. Lets put away the Titan and Robin Hood red herrings and get back to the historicity of Jesus.

Vinnie
Vinnie is offline  
Old 04-12-2003, 07:52 PM   #78
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Waterbury, Ct, Usa
Posts: 6,523
Lightbulb

Why not! I'll play along.

Are any "educated" mythicists who like to trumpet Robin Hood red herrings up for a real discussion? If so feel free to post an inventory of the Robin Hood tradition by chronological stratification and independent attestation. I also want short descriptions of sources including possible authors, recipients or intended audiences, textual critical views of the sources etc. To see an example of something similar to what I am asking for see Appendix 1 of The Historical Jesus by John Dominic Crossan (pp. 427-450).

I also want a basic chronology of Robin Hood's life or simply the time he was said to live (outer limits on birth and death being established) and I want to know how this information is obtained. Further, I expect this information to be obtained through critical-historical means. For an example see John Meier's chronology of Jesus in A Marginal Jew Volume 1 pp. 372-433

I won't be holding my breath.

Vinnie
Vinnie is offline  
Old 04-12-2003, 07:58 PM   #79
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Waterbury, Ct, Usa
Posts: 6,523
Default

Let it be known that I know next to nothing about the possibility of a historical Robin Hood or any of the alleged sources. I saw the movie with Kevin Costner and probably a cartoon here or there and that is pretty much the extent of my "Robin Hood knowledge".

Vinnie
Vinnie is offline  
Old 04-12-2003, 09:56 PM   #80
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
Default

Here is a place to find plenty of Robin Hood scholarship:

http://www.geocities.com/puckrobin/rh/index.html

See especially "Search for a real Robin Hood."

I deny an exact parallel between the cases of Robin Hood and Jesus, of course. For example, there is no collection of early Hood material that neglects to emphasize historical details--the earliest Hood sources couldn't have been speaking of a heavenly being in their ballads. The parallel would be closer in regards to Wellsian mythicists who propose a "Jesus" before Pilate, or otherwise raise issues of chronology, becuase Robin Hood (also) has competing alleged dates.

best,
Peter Kirby
Peter Kirby is online now   Edit/Delete Message
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:08 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.