FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-17-2003, 07:11 PM   #31
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: burbank
Posts: 758
Default

why that's false advertising! who's selling it like that?
fatherphil is offline  
Old 04-17-2003, 09:25 PM   #32
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 1,505
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by fatherphil
unfortunately accepting Christ as saviour is no magic pill in this world. we still remain humans struggling with human struggles.
The problem is that accepting Christ as saviour is no more effective than any other "spiritual" placebo and in many cases, has a negative effect.

-Mike...
mike_decock is offline  
Old 04-17-2003, 09:38 PM   #33
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Twin Cities, USA
Posts: 3,197
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by fatherphil
why that's false advertising! who's selling it like that?
You obviously don't get the TeleEvangelist programmes.
Bree is offline  
Old 04-18-2003, 04:19 AM   #34
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: burbank
Posts: 758
Default

bree, i may not be buying what they're selling. i also don't buy ronco products either

mike, there must be cases where it is beneficial.
fatherphil is offline  
Old 04-18-2003, 05:21 AM   #35
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: somewhere in the known Universe
Posts: 6,993
Default

Quote:
mike, there must be cases where it is beneficial
It is entirely possible and likely that some theists find benefit from their religion and help with their marriage, but it appears that it is no better then any other method of psychological support. Christianity IS billed as the end all, be all, the Truth, the Light, and yadda, yadda. By definition it is suppose to THEE solution! Marriage is suppose to be a covenant before God (and not just A god, but thee ONLY God) blessed by and looked at by Him. Church members usually have to receive marriage counseling before the walk down the aisle and receive the Sacrament of Marriage, and the Church alleged magical powers as suppose to imbue it with something more then what the non-theist, or non-Christian could ever have because of the mere fact they aren't Christian.

So ... something is amiss when Christians who make up almost 90% of the US Population has a significantly higher divorce rate then atheists and agnostics. Furthermore, the numbers are not equal. Let's say there are 100 million Christians (probably an under estimate) and 10 million atheist/agnostics in this country. You do the math ... There are literally MILLIONS more Christians who divorce then atheists/agnostics. Now if the numbers were equal that difference would still be significant as hundreds of thousands more theists would divorce. There are millions more broken homes in Christian households. Millions more children suffering because of divorce. Millions more single Christian parents fighting the system to get adequate child support from their former, Christian spouse .... the implications are enormous.

That being said I do not think Christianity is wholly to blame. I think there are a number of significant factors, but those other factors are influenced by the doctrinal and cultural aspects Christianity is responsible for in those communities.

What I would also like to see is a comparison of people happy and fulfilled in their marriages between the groups, as oppossed to people still married. We all know plenty of people, some of who are our parents who stay in dysfunctional and destructive marriages because of their religious beliefs. I think that is even more telling then divorce rates amongst the different groups.

Brighid
brighid is offline  
Old 04-18-2003, 08:10 AM   #36
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,872
Default

Quote:
So ... something is amiss when Christians who make up almost 90%
Atheist definition of "Christian" for our purposes here:

"Anyone who says so, including Adolf Hitler."

This whole thread is based on such gratuitous premises and contradictory thinking. If one is going to define a Chrsitian as a person having "fruit" then the thread is simply self-righteous double-talk.

Oh wait. It's Friday, so the lack of "fruit" some atheists like to point out is not a factor. Gotta love such "rational thinking."

Rad
Radorth is offline  
Old 04-18-2003, 08:28 AM   #37
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Deployed to Kosovo
Posts: 4,314
Default

In that case, Radorth, Christianity is the single least ineffective philosophy/theology the world has ever seen in its history. Very few of its adherents actually manage to become true Christians, making it useless at keeping people good and righteous.

You lose either way.

(I also find it interesting that, back in the days where Radorth was regularly trounced at CSS debates, and arguing about what the founding fathers believed, his definition of Christian was considerably looser than it is now. Interesting, no?)
Daggah is offline  
Old 04-18-2003, 08:28 AM   #38
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: somewhere in the known Universe
Posts: 6,993
Default

Radorth,

Whatever is your problem? The statistics come from those people who classify THEMSELVES as Christians, whatever brand that may be. It isn't atheists classifying Christians as Christians in an attempt to discredit them. The Barna Group is a CHRISTIAN group run by Christians, and this is where the information comes from.

Brighid
brighid is offline  
Old 04-18-2003, 08:37 AM   #39
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 1,505
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Radorth
Atheist definition of "Christian" for our purposes here:

"Anyone who says so, including Adolf Hitler."

This whole thread is based on such gratuitous premises and contradictory thinking. If one is going to define a Chrsitian as a person having "fruit" then the thread is simply self-righteous double-talk.
This discussion is based on research published by Barna Research Group, a Christian organisation which provides "Strategic Information You Can Trust". If anything, the data is more likely to be biased in favor of Christians.

To accuse us of using an "atheist definition" is a pitiful denial of the facts.

-Mike...
mike_decock is offline  
Old 04-18-2003, 08:39 AM   #40
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Dallas
Posts: 4,351
Default

As has been mentioned, I really feel that the problem with many religious relationships, is the refusal to live together for a bit, before committing for life. To me, it just makes more sense, in every way to give it a try before you "buy" so to speak.
AquaVita is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:40 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.