FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-29-2003, 09:22 AM   #21
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 138
Default

Quote:
Rhea wrote:
Humans can take silicone, some gold, a little bit of selenium or gallium arsenide or whatever they're using these days, and by arranging them in certain patterns, cause a thing to start functioning that is capable of observing and doing new things based on those observations.
Unless we're talking about the Fem-Bots from the Austin Powers movies, I think you mean "silicon," not "silicone."

- Nathan
njhartsh is offline  
Old 04-29-2003, 10:06 AM   #22
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
Posts: 503
Default Re: Re: Lets clear it up

[QUOTE]Originally posted by emotional
So illogical one simply doesn't know where to begin...



Maybe you didn't need parents to exist either.



Bifurcation fallacy: either "God" or "matter" always existed. I believe in neither. In the beginning there was energy, which configured itself into mind, which created matter out of existing energy.


Calling my statement illogical might make you feel better, but the fact is my statement is more logical than believing in some super deity that rules our world. By stating that I needed my parents to exist, you have shown your lack of knowledge and narrow view of life. You only see life arising from life, so you expect that is the only way life could arise. Therefore you assume there is a creator for our world. It has been proven in studies that life could arise from non-living matter, very very simple life, but life none-the-less. By the way, matter is energy, try reading a physics book sometime.
Jake
SimplyAtheistic is offline  
Old 04-29-2003, 10:16 AM   #23
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Recluse
Posts: 9,040
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by njhartsh
Unless we're talking about the Fem-Bots from the Austin Powers movies, I think you mean "silicon," not "silicone."

- Nathan
Thanks for the correction. I know better! Not sure how that slipped out. Maybe I need to file an invention disclosure, hee hee.

(funny you should think of breasts and my first thought was bathtub caulk.)
Rhea is offline  
Old 04-29-2003, 12:18 PM   #24
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 1,505
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Lets clear it up

Quote:
Originally posted by emotional
Matter is a form of energy. One form of energy.
At least we can agree on that.

Quote:
You mean you have no need to assume a creative mind.
I mean there is no need to assume a creative mind. The only reason you feel the need to is because your theology demands it.

Quote:
You believe matter preceded mind.
It's a safe assumption. We can scientifically observe the operations of our mind (matter/energy). We may not fully understand how it operates, but ignorance isn't proof of the supernatural.

Quote:
I think this is an irrational assumption.
I think you're wrong.

Quote:
Mind preceded matter.
Unsupported irrational assertion.

Quote:
It is by being infused with the imperative of mind that matter combines and forms such wonderful shapes of us.
Unsupported irrational assertion.

Quote:
Matter is animated by mind.
Only in living things.

-Mike...
mike_decock is offline  
Old 04-29-2003, 12:25 PM   #25
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Recluse
Posts: 9,040
Default

Quote:
Matter is animated by mind.
Plants have minds?
Raindrops have minds?
Lightning has a mind?



What is matter?
What is animation?
Rhea is offline  
Old 04-29-2003, 12:53 PM   #26
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Boxing ring of HaShem, Jesus and Allah
Posts: 1,945
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Lets clear it up

Quote:
Originally posted by Starboy
Cool! Make my computer jump around on my desk (without your body, just your mind).
Argumentum ad Ridiculum. Ignored.
emotional is offline  
Old 04-29-2003, 12:55 PM   #27
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Boxing ring of HaShem, Jesus and Allah
Posts: 1,945
Default Re: Re: Re: Lets clear it up

Quote:
Originally posted by JakeJohnson
Calling my statement illogical might make you feel better, but the fact is my statement is more logical than believing in some super deity that rules our world.


I don't believe in a "super deity that rules our world". I'm a naturalist, like most people here, believing in the constantness and immutability of natural law. But unlike most people here, I'm not a materialist. I believe mind preceded matter.
emotional is offline  
Old 04-29-2003, 12:58 PM   #28
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Boxing ring of HaShem, Jesus and Allah
Posts: 1,945
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Lets clear it up

Quote:
Originally posted by mike_decock
I mean there is no need to assume a creative mind. The only reason you feel the need to is because your theology demands it.


Let's invert this: "I mean there is a need to assume a creative mind. The only reason you feel there is no need is because your materialistic belief demands it."

Quote:

It's a safe assumption. We can scientifically observe the operations of our mind (matter/energy). We may not fully understand how it operates, but ignorance isn't proof of the supernatural.


Even if all cognitive functions were to be mapped to specific areas in the brain, it still wouldn't be proof that mind is synonymous with the brain. And quit talking about the supernatural! I don't believe in the supernatural!

Quote:

I think you're wrong.


I'm sure I'm right

Quote:

Unsupported irrational assertion.


Eff you.

Quote:

Unsupported irrational assertion.


Eff you.

Quote:

Only in living things.
In all things.

*sigh* Materialists. The mirror image of Christian fundamentalists. Dogma, dogma, dogma.
emotional is offline  
Old 04-29-2003, 01:45 PM   #29
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 1,505
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Lets clear it up

Quote:
Originally posted by emotional
Let's invert this: "I mean there is a need to assume a creative mind.
Unsupported irrational assertion.

Quote:
The only reason you feel there is no need is because your materialistic belief demands it."
The natural world is the only thing we can have any knowledge of. Anything else is speculation, fantasy and mythology. If you wanna believe in the supernatural, be my guest. Whatever creams your twinky, bud.

Quote:
Even if all cognitive functions were to be mapped to specific areas in the brain, it still wouldn't be proof that mind is synonymous with the brain.
LOL. Obstinate ignorance on parade here, folks!

Quote:
And quit talking about the supernatural! I don't believe in the supernatural!


Your belief in a supernatural God demands that you assume supernatural explanations for natural phenomena which require no supernatural assumptions.

Quote:
I'm sure I'm right
Your certainty has no effect on how wrong you are.

Quote:
Eff you.
Undeserved irrational insult.

Quote:
Eff you.
Undeserved irrational insult.

Quote:
In all things.
Unsupported irrational assertion.

Quote:
*sigh* Materialists. The mirror image of Christian fundamentalists. Dogma, dogma, dogma.
*sigh* Theists. The supernaturalist irrational asserters.

-Mike...
mike_decock is offline  
Old 04-29-2003, 02:00 PM   #30
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Boxing ring of HaShem, Jesus and Allah
Posts: 1,945
Default

DeCock, let's make this clear:

A theist believes in an external sovereign over nature. I don't believe in such, so I'm not a theist. I believe, as most people here do, that the laws of nature are immutable and do not follow the whims of people (ie prayer doesn't work).

However, I don't believe matter is all there is. I believe there are other realms existing side-by-side with the current material realm we're in. (and please don't ask me for evidence of this; I've already given evidence, only to have it ridiculed, and I'll NOT be going through that again). I believe in life after death. I believe mind (which is natural, not supernatural) preceded matter. I do not believe said mind is God.

I'm a naturalist but not a materialist. That's all. That doesn't make me a supernaturalist or a theist.
emotional is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:51 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.