Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
05-23-2002, 03:37 PM | #41 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Down South
Posts: 12,879
|
Quote:
|
|
05-23-2002, 03:38 PM | #42 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: I`ve left and gone away
Posts: 699
|
<<<< I removed my previous post due to a grammatical error and somewhat rude content. I don`t want to be responsible for any decorum issues here at II >>>>
[ May 23, 2002: Message edited by: Anunnaki ]</p> |
05-23-2002, 03:40 PM | #43 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Sydney Australia and beyond the realms of Gehenna
Posts: 6,035
|
Quote:
God supposedly gave us free will, the will to choose him or not to choose as you put it "the Lords path". You have effectively removed any free will your children may have by not letting make their own decisions for themselves, how is this the right decision? I understand your reasoning for not letting them go to school and not to have friends <bizarre as that may sound>. You disagree with their teachings, and believe they might corrupt your children as they have <or have not, i would probably say> done to others. If the Lords power and your example were good enough, how is this necessary? If you want your children to be the best Christians they can be, it seems only logical for their faith to be able to withstand adversity from the very beginning. By not letting them experience reality, as opposed to your own private perfect kingdom, you are obliviously setting them up for atheism by not letting them try and justify anything on the basis of their religion. thanks for doing that, its a hell of a lot easier than converting them ourselves. your attempt at good parenting has pretty much failed at this point. its obvious from how many questions you have been able to answer and chosen to answer here, that you yourself have trouble justifying your faith and supporting with reason your actions. if you cant do it, then how could you possibly expect your children to be true christians? you cant hide reality from them for the rest of their life, and when they find it, they arent going to cope. |
|
05-23-2002, 04:03 PM | #44 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 1,059
|
Quote:
Hi Michael: Ugh. The more I learn about the Bible, the more disgusting it gets. Two questions I suppose: What's the most common way for 'True Christians' to weasel out of this one (not that I think not stoning your child is a BAD thing, mind you, but how do they claim to believe in the literal truth of the Bible and still not do this)? And what if it's a daughter? -Perchance. |
|
05-23-2002, 04:50 PM | #45 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Charlotte, NC USA
Posts: 45
|
Quote:
|
|
05-23-2002, 05:42 PM | #46 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Orlando, Fl
Posts: 5,864
|
Quote:
|
|
05-24-2002, 12:25 AM | #47 |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: The Execution State, USA
Posts: 5,031
|
So, um...TC...any plans in the near future to start posting replies?
|
05-24-2002, 12:56 AM | #48 |
Contributor
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Saint Paul, MN
Posts: 24,524
|
How about replies from a True Christian (by definition, since I accept the Nicene Creed, etcetera etcetera) who isn't that particular user?
No kids, yet, but if I have 'em, they'll learn science as one of many possible tools, and evolution as the best theory (assuming, as I suspect is likely, that it's still the best theory.) We'll also expose them to the beautiful poetic language of Genesis, and explain how people used creation myths to explain a complicated world. This doesn't mean we won't *also* teach them about religion, and why it can be an important or good thing. We'll also try to teach them what's *bad* about some religious attitudes, and try to steer them away from such things. I hope they end up believing, but if they don't, well... that's free will for ya. |
05-24-2002, 01:19 AM | #49 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Scotland
Posts: 4,177
|
Quote:
Second attempt for true christian or any other to answer this. |
|
05-24-2002, 01:25 AM | #50 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Saint Paul, MN
Posts: 24,524
|
Quote:
Quote:
The laws in Leviticus are generally disregarded entirely, because several New Testament passages claim that Christ "fulfilled" the law. Time and time again we are reminded that the law was to "prepare" us for Christ. Christians have only two commandments, really: Love God, and love thy neighbor as thyself. Everything else we're *actually* supposed to do follows from that. Ah-hah!, you will say. You want to know why Christians always quote Leviticus when it *DOES* support them. I dunno. H&R block sent me a nasty letter once citing a law that had been thrown out by the Supreme Court five years earlier. (I swore at them in email once. They cited the CDA.) People are dumb. |
||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|