Freethought & Rationalism Archive

RufusAtticus · 11-09-2002, 08:23 PM

I guess Vander must concede that good mutations exist.

Automaton · 11-10-2002, 02:58 PM

Quote:

I guess Vander must concede that good mutations exist.

Vander accepting valid evidence presented to him in a polite, meaningful context? Bah, a freezing day in hell would come much sooner.

Camaban · 11-10-2002, 06:34 PM

*wonders when a response will come*

Jesus Tap-Dancin' Christ · 11-10-2002, 11:29 PM

We left no weasel room. Therefore, never.

Camaban · 11-11-2002, 02:27 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jesus Christ:
We left no weasel room. Therefore, never.

Gotta admit, this thread is definitely one for the archives

Dan828 · 11-11-2002, 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jesus Christ:
We left no weasel room. Therefore, never.

Yeah, but you'd have thought that about the chromosome thread as well.

pug846 · 11-12-2002, 07:26 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Vanderzyden:
Rufus,

No worries, I'll be back. But it may be a few days.

John

Few days = two weeks? I guess it was a translation error.

Jack the Bodiless · 11-12-2002, 07:41 AM

...A response! Not here, but on the <a href="http://iidb.org/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic&f=58&t=001588&p=3" target="_blank">Theistic Evolution</a> thread:

Quote:

We shall see if those "beneficial mutations" withstand more objective scrutiny. I have read much to the contrary, and, so far, I have only seen the Darwinist response in the "Good mutations" thread.

Summary: Vanderzyden asked for "good mutations".

Vanderzyden was given "good mutations".

But a list of "good mutations" is a Darwinist response, triggering Vander's "fundie delusion preservation mechanism".

Darwinist responses are not permitted. They will be discarded.

...Vander, the truth is very simple. As with so many creationist claims (lack of beneficial mutations, lack of transitional forms, lack of a mechanism for increasing information), the creationists are LYING. The phenomenon of "Lying for the Lord" is VERY familiar to us.

But this is a Darwinist response, and will be ignored.

[ November 12, 2002: Message edited by: Jack the Bodiless ]

Boro Nut · 11-12-2002, 09:24 AM

[ let's not sidetrack a legitimate creationist bashing, OK? ]

[ November 12, 2002: Message edited by: pz ]

Doubting Didymus · 11-12-2002, 02:19 PM

Whenever I see one of boro nuts posts with the content removed, I get the feeling that I have missed out on something.

11-12-2002, 09:24 AM	#69
Boro Nut Veteran Member Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Middlesbrough, England Posts: 3,909	[ let's not sidetrack a legitimate creationist bashing, OK? ] [ November 12, 2002: Message edited by: pz ]</p>

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

11-09-2002, 08:23 PM	#61
RufusAtticus Veteran Member Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: NCSU Posts: 5,853	I guess Vander must concede that good mutations exist.

11-10-2002, 06:34 PM	#63
Camaban Regular Member Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Australia Posts: 473	wonders when a response will come

11-10-2002, 11:29 PM	#64
Jesus Tap-Dancin' Christ Veteran Member Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Heaven Posts: 6,980	We left no weasel room. Therefore, never.

11-12-2002, 02:19 PM	#70
Doubting Didymus Veteran Member Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: East Coast. Australia. Posts: 5,455	Whenever I see one of boro nuts posts with the content removed, I get the feeling that I have missed out on something.

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.