FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-19-2002, 05:03 AM   #71
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 333
Post

Splashing,

If you read through the thread you'll see that I have commented on these same ideas previously.

SB
snatchbalance is offline  
Old 08-19-2002, 06:34 AM   #72
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Posts: 1,336
Post

Greetings:

Antics with semantics.

Everything in this debate rests on how 'human' is defined.

Keith.
Keith Russell is offline  
Old 08-19-2002, 09:15 AM   #73
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,125
Post

Hello SB,

Quote:
However, accutally turning a human into a "machine" is still the stuff of science fiction. Theory is way, way ahead of practice.
This is the closest I could find to an objection to what I wrote. Perhaps you dealt with this idea in another thread, such as the A.I. thread, so I quess I'll look around.
Bible Humper is offline  
Old 08-21-2002, 11:31 AM   #74
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 333
Post

BH/S

Quote:
If the inorganic brain is identical in every way to the organic brain besides being inorganic?
Would an inorganic(metal/silicon) brain need to be fed a supply of oxygenated blood, or O2 at all for that matter?

sb
snatchbalance is offline  
Old 08-24-2002, 02:48 PM   #75
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,125
Post

Just noticed that you answered my last post here, Snatchbalance.

You believe that oxygen is required for consciousness? Is this the hindu concept of Prana(sp?)?
Bible Humper is offline  
Old 08-28-2002, 06:08 AM   #76
Synaesthesia
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Snatchbalance,
Quote:
1. If you build a machine that is consciuos, it will know that it is a machine. It will have no reason to have biological drives. It won't really need food, air, sex, etc. You can simulate these needs all you want, they remain simulations. Get it?
If we emulated a human brain on a computer, it couldn’t possibly know that it was a computer unless we gave it information to that effect. There is every reason to believe that concious computers would be, to paraphrase Minsky, every bit as confused and inconsistent about intelligence as we are.

Why People think Computers Can’t. By Marvin Minsky:
<a href="http://web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/papers/ComputersCantThink.txt" target="_blank">http://web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/papers/ComputersCantThink.txt</a>

Of particular interest is the question of whether humans are truly self-aware. I think it is a very appropriate response to you very strage suggestion that a concious computer would necessarily be aware of it's silicone nature.

Quote:
2. We really are dealing in fantasy at this piont. None of what you describe is even remotely possible.
As far as it is possible to tell, the functional organization of the brain is the necessary and sufficient condition for consciousness. Clearly if function is not necessary or not sufficient for consciousness (ether condition is highly implausible given what we currently know about perception), it is you who must indicate how we could know this.

Regards,
Synaesthesia
 
Old 08-28-2002, 07:42 AM   #77
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 333
Post

S


Quote:
If we emulated a human brain on a computer, it couldn’t possibly know that it was a computer unless we gave it information to that effect
Well, the people around the computer might tell it that it is not human. You would have to feed it a complete virtual environment.

SB
snatchbalance is offline  
Old 08-28-2002, 07:46 AM   #78
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 333
Post

S

Quote:
As far as it is possible to tell, the functional organization of the brain is the necessary and sufficient condition for consciousness. Clearly if function is not necessary or not sufficient for consciousness (ether condition is highly implausible given what we currently know about perception), it is you who must indicate how we could know this.
Yes, but you ignore the salient section of my post; therory is way ahead of practice. We know what is required to make a round trip manned tour of the solar system, but is it realist to think we can accually do it? All scifi stuff.

SB
snatchbalance is offline  
Old 08-28-2002, 07:53 AM   #79
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 333
Post

BH/S

Quote:
You believe that oxygen is required for consciousness? Is this the hindu concept of Prana(sp?)?
no, not at all. But an organic brain needs O2, a metal/silicon brain does not. Such a brain would have no reason to avoid a O2 deprrived state, like an organic brain does. This is but one example of the differences between the types of consciounes that could arise from different types of brains.

SB
snatchbalance is offline  
Old 09-01-2002, 12:11 AM   #80
Synaesthesia
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Snatch,
Quote:
But an organic brain needs O2, a metal/silicon brain does not. Such a brain would have no reason to avoid a O2 deprrived state, like an organic brain does. This is but one example of the differences between the types of consciounes that could arise from different types of brains.
This of course is a functional difference. Emulating a human brain functionally would be ridiculously complicated for reasons like this.
 
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:26 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.