Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
08-19-2002, 05:03 AM | #71 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 333
|
Splashing,
If you read through the thread you'll see that I have commented on these same ideas previously. SB |
08-19-2002, 06:34 AM | #72 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Posts: 1,336
|
Greetings:
Antics with semantics. Everything in this debate rests on how 'human' is defined. Keith. |
08-19-2002, 09:15 AM | #73 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,125
|
Hello SB,
Quote:
|
|
08-21-2002, 11:31 AM | #74 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 333
|
BH/S
Quote:
sb |
|
08-24-2002, 02:48 PM | #75 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,125
|
Just noticed that you answered my last post here, Snatchbalance.
You believe that oxygen is required for consciousness? Is this the hindu concept of Prana(sp?)? |
08-28-2002, 06:08 AM | #76 | ||
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Snatchbalance,
Quote:
Why People think Computers Can’t. By Marvin Minsky: <a href="http://web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/papers/ComputersCantThink.txt" target="_blank">http://web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/papers/ComputersCantThink.txt</a> Of particular interest is the question of whether humans are truly self-aware. I think it is a very appropriate response to you very strage suggestion that a concious computer would necessarily be aware of it's silicone nature. Quote:
Regards, Synaesthesia |
||
08-28-2002, 07:42 AM | #77 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 333
|
S
Quote:
SB |
|
08-28-2002, 07:46 AM | #78 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 333
|
S
Quote:
SB |
|
08-28-2002, 07:53 AM | #79 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 333
|
BH/S
Quote:
SB |
|
09-01-2002, 12:11 AM | #80 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Snatch,
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|