FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > Political Discussions, 2003-2007
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 02:40 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-07-2005, 07:03 AM   #1
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: the north
Posts: 12,935
Default Canada told to join US Missile Plan

Canada's been balking on this issue for a while now. Personally, I don't think the country has much of a choice but to join in some capacity sooner or later. It would be nice to see a hold-out but I doubt it will occur.

Thoughts?

http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/natio...ile050106.html
Quote:
A draft report from the American Assembly at Columbia University says if Canada joins, it would get the issue off the table and allow both countries to move on to issues like co-ordinating maritime defence and trans-border emergencies.

But the assembly's report wasn't unanimous.

A handful of high-profile Canadians, including former prime minister Joe Clark, expressed reservations about the plan.
Trout is offline  
Old 02-07-2005, 09:50 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 1,806
Default

I hate the idea of getting involved in this dumbass boondoggle of a "plan," but this may be one of those times where Canada is forced to participate or face (unspoken but real) economic and political sanctions. Frankly, I wish we'd just say damn the torpedoes and say "no thanks," but I'm not sure how realistic that position is. I feel bad for Paul Martin - this is one of those "rock and a hard place" issues.
EarlFlynn is offline  
Old 02-07-2005, 09:55 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Canada, deep in the heart of the boreal forest
Posts: 4,239
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EarlFlynn
I hate the idea of getting involved in this dumbass boondoggle of a "plan," but this may be one of those times where Canada is forced to participate or face (unspoken but real) economic and political sanctions. Frankly, I wish we'd just say damn the torpedoes and say "no thanks," but I'm not sure how realistic that position is. I feel bad for Paul Martin - this is one of those "rock and a hard place" issues.
What EarlFlynn said.

I'm too sickened and angry at the moment to be able to add further comment.
socratoad is offline  
Old 02-07-2005, 10:14 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portsmouth, England
Posts: 4,652
Default

Has Mexico joined? If not will they be "forced" as well?

Amen-Moses
Amen-Moses is offline  
Old 02-07-2005, 10:14 AM   #5
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: the north
Posts: 12,935
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by socratoad
What EarlFlynn said.

I'm too sickened and angry at the moment to be able to add further comment.
Agreed. What was that quote about the elephant?
Trout is offline  
Old 02-07-2005, 10:15 AM   #6
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 321
Default

The Liberals were always going to participate anyway.
growker is offline  
Old 02-07-2005, 10:15 AM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Canada, deep in the heart of the boreal forest
Posts: 4,239
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trout
Agreed. What was that quote about the elephant?
:thumbs:

My own quotation: It matters not how unintelligent the elephant may be, its BIG
socratoad is offline  
Old 02-07-2005, 01:54 PM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Kiwi @ Nexus
Posts: 5,825
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EarlFlynn
I hate the idea of getting involved in this dumbass boondoggle of a "plan," but this may be one of those times where Canada is forced to participate or face (unspoken but real) economic and political sanctions. Frankly, I wish we'd just say damn the torpedoes and say "no thanks," but I'm not sure how realistic that position is. I feel bad for Paul Martin - this is one of those "rock and a hard place" issues.
Same thing happened to us as a result of going nuclear-free. You know what? We're still coping. If you don't want the damn thing tell the US to shove it where the sun don't shine. It's quite enormously satisfying, really.

Trust me. You'll both find a way to live with it.
Octavia is offline  
Old 02-07-2005, 01:56 PM   #9
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 321
Default

There wouldn't be any sanctions from the US against Canada. But the US would go ahead with it anyway, and Canada would have no say in its operation. A bit of soveriegnty lost.
growker is offline  
Old 02-07-2005, 02:00 PM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Canada, deep in the heart of the boreal forest
Posts: 4,239
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Octavia
Same thing happened to us as a result of going nuclear-free. You know what? We're still coping. If you don't want the damn thing tell the US to shove it where the sun don't shine. It's quite enormously satisfying, really.

Trust me. You'll both find a way to live with it.
I would like to think that you are right. Unfortunately there are just so many home-grown carpet baggers here to make integrity and ethics a rather huge problem. I'm still hoping that our prime minister will actually stand up on his hind legs and make a stand on this issue.
socratoad is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:11 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.