Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
10-24-2002, 11:02 PM | #41 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: NZ
Posts: 7,895
|
Quote:
*squeals with delight as she thinks of the possibilities and the fact that she still, thankfully, has a clitoris and a sexual imagination! Heh.* |
|
10-24-2002, 11:21 PM | #42 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: OH
Posts: 1,292
|
in response to arrowman's first post, on my first post....
so we have agreed that the female form is (traditionally) much more severe than the male...but physical integrity is the basis of my original post...why is it that some forms of physically altering one's body are seen as OK while other's are seen as proposterous? Even if in a doctor's office, w/ anesthesia and a nice clean scalpel, the doctor were to remove even just the hood of the clitoris, we would be outraged... |
10-24-2002, 11:50 PM | #43 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: b
Posts: 673
|
Quote:
Tradition, on the other hand, can enure one to all sorts of horrors. Sometimes it is necessary to look again at certain practices that are common place but questionable. When I was pregnant I had decided, in the event that I had a boy, that would have him circumcised. I wanted him to look like most everyone else, I thought "like father, like son", and I am technically Jewish and so my son would be as well. Who ever heard of an uncircumcised Jew? Now, thankfully, I realise how stupid those reasons are. I am appalled that this ritual still takes place. It's pointless and cruel. If I have a baby boy I will not have him circumcised and I am relieved I didn't have to make this decision before I woke up. Glory |
|
10-25-2002, 12:00 AM | #44 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: b
Posts: 673
|
Quote:
I get plenty out of intercourse. There are a lot of sensations from penile penetrattion which, while not orgasm, are still quite wonderful. I find that even after I have had an orgasm I still won't really feel satisfied unless I get intercourse. There is also the peripheral physical contact. I love being body to body with someone. As I am sure you're all aware, orgasm is the brass ring but it isn't the only goal of intercourse. Glory |
|
10-25-2002, 12:16 AM | #45 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: OH
Posts: 1,292
|
yay glory! i'm really happy you have thought about this and not become just a slave to tradition...you are absolutely right, it is done too much in tradition and I myself just don't get how ppl are able to continue to turn the other cheek...
as George Bernard Shaw said, "Custom wil reconcile people to any atrocity; and fashion will drive them to acquire any custom" |
10-25-2002, 12:32 AM | #46 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Quebec, Canada
Posts: 828
|
Quote:
As I pointed out in my previous posts, MGM is about much more than hygiene or 'looks'. It removes large quantities of very sensitive material while denying adequate protection and sensitivity to the remaining material. Also, it should be known that MGM was first hawked in English-speaking countries as a cure to masturbation. Watch any intact man masturbate and you'll see him rubbing and rolling his foreskin over his glans. For him, that's simply a no-brainer. The doctors and fundamentalist Christians who promoted MGM at the end of the 19th century were very aware of the pleasure to be gained through stimulation of the foreskin or through stimulation of the glans with the foreskin, and they did not even try to hide that elimination of that pleasure was their aim. As late as the 1940s, fundies parents would justify circumcising their son by saying they wanted to ensure "he would not play with it". And MGM has broader implications than simply impairing masturbation. Intact men usually experience this gliding of the foreskin over the glans during intercourse. The sensations that are felt through this gliding cannot be duplicated by other means. A trombone can play more notes than a bugle. It is relevant to look at the intents of those practicing a practice only if we want to assess the morality of those people. However, when evaluating the morality of the practice itself, we should only pay attention to the effects of this practice. In the case of MGM, this is a violation of physical integrity followed by a diminution of sexual function and sensitivity. |
|
10-25-2002, 10:40 AM | #47 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: b
Posts: 673
|
Quote:
I never knew that but it makes a lot of sense. Nothing gets white people more upset then masturbation. Glory |
|
10-25-2002, 11:00 AM | #48 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 5,658
|
It is worth mentioning that the original form of circumcision involved severing only the tip of the foreskin rather than removing it in its entirety. Now, while I am opposed to infant and other non-consetual circumcision, I do not think that it compares to most female genital mutilation.
Is circumcision about "looks"? It is only going to make a significant difference when someone is naked and not sexually excited, which limits worries about the "look" to a small number of trivial viewings. Is circumcision about hygiene? It is extremely easy to keep clean, so it will only marginally improve the hygiene of those unconcerned with hygiene. Anyway, I love my foreskin - it protects my glans from drying out or rubbing on clothes, and is extremely useful for masturbation. |
10-29-2002, 04:03 PM | #49 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Marcos
Posts: 551
|
MGM is about some stupid "Covenent of the Flesh" superstition. I suppose it may have been stylish at one time, who knows why. Perhaps now it's considered "stylish" as well, but I dun see why. To me it just seems like another superstitious practice carried on by inertia that is prolly better ended.
|
10-30-2002, 06:38 AM | #50 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 712
|
Quote:
It seems Dr Kellog, inventor of Kellog's cereal and a devout Seventh Day Adventist, invented his cereal as a calming food to lessen the evil of masturbation and sex drive. <a href="http://www.bullymag.com/4.2.01/masturbate-040201.asp" target="_blank">http://www.bullymag.com/4.2.01/masturbate-040201.asp</a> I've also seen old-time picrures of devices with metal prongs, and clasps, and all kinda pointy painful things which some parents made their kids wear to bed as guard against masturbation. If there is an erection, these devices acted as such painful and effective deterrant that the wearer promptly abandoned any evil thought. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|