FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-28-2003, 04:57 AM   #91
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: London
Posts: 1,425
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Shadowy Man
Yes. And it doesn't have a lens, it has a mirror. And it's mirror isn't bent, it just has a little extra spherical aberration, which is completely corrected in every instrument on board right now.
So its a bent lens with a skilled publicist?

I am aware of the structure of mirrored telescopes.

And I was under the impression that an adjustment was made to the interpetation of the recieved signals, rather than a correction to the mirror surface itslf; and while this will approximate what the raw inouts would have been, it does not duplicate them.

But if the above reading was incorrect, then we are already looking at the optimum frequency, and presumably there is nothing there. In whic case the Paradox persists.
contracycle is offline  
Old 07-28-2003, 05:50 AM   #92
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: A Shadowy Planet
Posts: 7,585
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by contracycle
So its a bent lens with a skilled publicist?
Huh?

Quote:
I am aware of the structure of mirrored telescopes.
Then you should have known it didn't use lenses.

Quote:
And I was under the impression that an adjustment was made to the interpetation of the recieved signals, rather than a correction to the mirror surface itslf; and while this will approximate what the raw inouts would have been, it does not duplicate them.
The spherical aberration correction is made in the individual instruments now. Originally, a corrective system called COSTAR was put into the Hubble, but every instrument that has been up since then has had the correction built into its optical system.

No change has been made to the primary mirror. However, the aberration is very well understood and has been corrected extremely well.
Shadowy Man is offline  
Old 07-29-2003, 03:35 AM   #93
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: London
Posts: 1,425
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Shadowy Man
Then you should have known it didn't use lenses.
I did, I also know the functionality of the mirrors is identical to the functionality of a lens. Whic is why I used the term; at least then evryone knows what function the bent bit was carrying out.
contracycle is offline  
Old 07-29-2003, 05:30 AM   #94
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: A Shadowy Planet
Posts: 7,585
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by contracycle
I did, I also know the functionality of the mirrors is identical to the functionality of a lens. Whic is why I used the term; at least then evryone knows what function the bent bit was carrying out.
Whatever.
Shadowy Man is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:25 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.