FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Feedback Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-24-2003, 12:25 PM   #211
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by HelenM
It seems to me that when it comes to theist beliefs, many people here are willing to spend forever analyzing and dissecting and objecting to them.

When it comes to the 'no theist moderators' rule, some are evidently content with 'it works, why change it?' or 'it's obviously against the mission statement'.

It seems that there is a reluctance on the part of some to apply the same critical, analytical standards to the latter as to the former.

Why is that? Shouldn't critical analysis be applied just as rigorously to those rules/ideas we like, as to those we don't?

If not, then 'critical thinking' can be simply a smokescreen used to try to justify one's own irrational biases. And, imo, the 'most deluded theist' is not necessarily more deluded than the self-proclaimed 'rational, critical thinking' nontheist who is selective about which issues he/she critically thinks about.

Helen
I have tried to think critically about this issue, and I keep asking how a theist can honestly support the goals of an organization that is devoted to non-belief. The answer seems to be that they can support some of the goals in some situations, but the discussion keeps getting derailed by the charge of "bigotry" which just does not fit here.

I have decided that I would go along with accepting a theist moderator in some cases, if all the conditions were right, preferably in one of the specialized forums. But I do not see the need or value for a theist moderator right now. (leonarde - you lost fair and square. No theist moderator could have saved you.)

I would particulary object to redefining the mission of the boards from supporting non-belief to supporting non-believers.
Toto is offline  
Old 06-24-2003, 12:57 PM   #212
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,199
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Toto
I have tried to think critically about this issue, and I keep asking how a theist can honestly support the goals of an organization that is devoted to non-belief.
I don't see the relevance of the question. If I had a board dedicated to promoting yguy-ism, I wouldn't have any problem with an atheist mod, because by being himself, he would give me a chance to hold his truth up to scrutiny in the light of mine, whether he had any intention of supporting my beliefs or not. Or, if his arguments were better than mine, and I had the guts to admit it, I'd be smarter than I was before. Win-win deal.
yguy is offline  
Old 06-24-2003, 01:21 PM   #213
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

yguy - that's why we encourage theists to post here. Moderating is something else.
Toto is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:10 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.