Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
04-25-2003, 05:28 AM | #31 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: here
Posts: 121
|
Jesus realised he was wasting his time on us dressed apes and jumped on the first flying saucer off this rock!
"Yeah you lot, erm, be good an all that...byeee!!!" --WHHoooshh--> *waves* |
04-25-2003, 06:55 AM | #32 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Folding@Home in upstate NY
Posts: 14,394
|
BZZZT! I'm sorry. Thanks for playing.
Quote:
here is a link to the history of the Creed which I found on the Introduction link here. The following is from the historical note: Quote:
|
||
04-25-2003, 07:41 AM | #33 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Recluse
Posts: 9,040
|
Okay, so where is the mention of fruits, then?
|
04-25-2003, 11:54 AM | #34 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 1,671
|
A couple of other notes: The Lutherans change "catholic" to "christian" because they want nothing to do with the word even if it does mean universal.
In the Apostles Creed, which is the one I've heard all my life, the Methodists take out the part "He descended into Hell". Don't ask me why, I didn't go to Southern Methodist University in Dallas. To use the word "catholic" in a sentence: I have a very catholic record collection. I.e., many different kinds of music are represented in it. |
04-25-2003, 12:02 PM | #35 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Recluse
Posts: 9,040
|
Hey, where did Radorth go? I asked some direct questions. I thought they were on topic, polite. Maybe not?
What's wrong with adressing them? |
04-26-2003, 11:45 PM | #36 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 279
|
Don't feel bad, Rhea. I'm still waiting for Magus to define a "True Christian."
Oh well... |
04-27-2003, 09:04 AM | #37 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,872
|
Claiming their questions were never answered, as usual. I doubt you two will ever invent a question I haven't heard or addressed already. Saying I answered a question unsatisfactorily is fine. Intimating I'm afraid to or refuse to address them is merely self-aggrandizing nonsense. Radorth hasn't gone anywhere.
We've provided a definition of a true Christian almost all Christians can agree on. You are just nitpicking Magus' posts now hoping to convince yourselves you didn't waste bandwidth again. Rad |
04-27-2003, 09:28 AM | #38 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,199
|
Quote:
|
|
04-27-2003, 11:17 AM | #39 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: an inaccessible island fortress
Posts: 10,638
|
Sake, as your link tells the Nicene Creed was a pledge to the one Catholic Church. It was meant to establish its teachings as the only true ones as opposed to those of the Arian Christians.
The Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) may want to affirm it but there is still the problem with Protestantism having split from the universal Christian Church in the 1500's, well over a thousand years into the game. I know that most Protestant churches affirm it, and I know that they try to pass off the ridiculous lower case "c" to do so. It's called "eating your cake and keeping it too." |
04-27-2003, 12:04 PM | #40 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Recluse
Posts: 9,040
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|