FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-31-2003, 03:23 AM   #41
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hull UK
Posts: 854
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Sabine Grant
...I have never considered faith to be the product of reason. ...
Well Sabine, at last we agree on something.

By implication, your own faith is not based on reason, so tell me, how do you know you've chosen the right god?
AJ113 is offline  
Old 05-31-2003, 04:32 AM   #42
Talk Freethought Staff
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 32,364
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Kilgore Trout
Reason based on irrational assumptions is still irrational, no matter how rational the process is.

-Mike...


Mike is right. Don't blame "Mein Kampf" on being rational. While I don't claim to know exactly what thought process is used in it, somewhere in there it has to start with faulty assumptions. When you say things like "These types of people are bad..." you are automatically starting off irrationally. If someone says "1+1=4" he can use "logical"reasoning to say "therefore 2+2=8", but since he had a faulty premise the reasoning is nonsense, not rational thought.

Besides, the Old Testament uses thinking similar to Mein Kampf. God was saying things like "Such and such tribe are a bunch of pagan scum so you must kill them all. Babies and animals included." Sounds like genocide to me.
[/QUOTE]

I never wrote or claimed that Mein Kampf was rational... I wrote " that Hitler used a rational thought process to justify the final solution". I would appreciate if you quote me correctly if you wish to pursue a dialogue with me. Thanks!
In other words, I pointed to how the use of a rational thought process can lead to evil actions. I do not know if you read Mein Kampf but the train of arguments he presented created an ideology which seduced many. And among them individuals who were far from being ignorant or uneducated.
If you accept for example that one of his sources of inspiration was the nietzschean ideology leading to the creation of a supreme arian race, Hitler used a philosophical platform to concieve his own ideology. He also mixed some of Schoppenhauer's philosophy.
Of course one can argue that philosophy is not necessarly a science of reason and logic.
Are you disagreeing that a rational thought process can lead to evil consequences?
Sabine Grant is offline  
Old 05-31-2003, 04:39 AM   #43
Talk Freethought Staff
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 32,364
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Luiseach
For clarification: are you suggesting that ignorance is bliss?
I am suggesting that reason can produce evil. Also suggesting that a mind which cannot use rational thinking dwells on simplistic concepts. The " idiot du village" who is mostly an individual suffering of what is known as cretinism ( a genetical deffect first discovered in the Alpes) is far from being ignorant. He can be semi educated yet not be able to process information to use for analytical or deduction thought process. It is not a matter of being ignorant. It is a matter of not being able to process acquired information and apply it to daily reasoning.
Sabine Grant is offline  
Old 05-31-2003, 04:46 AM   #44
Talk Freethought Staff
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 32,364
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by AJ113
Well Sabine, at last we agree on something.

By implication, your own faith is not based on reason, so tell me, how do you know you've chosen the right god?
In order for me to argue the validity of my choice I would have had to claim that I have chosen the " right god". If you have browsed in some of the threads which touched base with reasons as to why some theists in this forum are christians, I have already explained my choice. My choice is not based on the need to claim to be absolutly right. My choice was based on the potential of personal transformation the teachings of Christ offers. My choice was based on my personal needs and how Christ meets those needs.
I do not think any theist can claim honestly to have chosen the " right god" until they can actualy meet the Creator. For some, God is something to look forward to in the afterlife..... for others, it is a now and then experience which allows them to be a better version of themselves.
Sabine Grant is offline  
Old 05-31-2003, 05:10 AM   #45
Talk Freethought Staff
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 32,364
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by mike_decock
I found an excellent website discussing Adolf Hitler's Religion with lots of excerpts from Mein Kampf. Hitler was the culmination of centuries of anti-semitism (those Jews were the "Christ-Killers", ya know). The world's most famous alter boy decided he was gonna follow God's will and restore the Aryan race that started with Adam.

-Mike...
I do not know where you found that the presumed location of the first invidual who illustrated the Aryan race was the garden of Eden... can you provide more documentation on that claim? Aryan comes from the name Ariane which was originaly the old territory of Persia.
I have not studied any passages of Mein Kampf in which Hitler claims to follow God's Will to restore the Aryan race which started with Adam. Considering that his main inspiration to the Aryan supreme race was driven by the works of Nietzsche who promotes zoroastrian philosophy, I wonder how the author of that web site can reconciliate that reality with what you claim the author states.
Also... your analysis as to the roots of antisemitism in Europe lacks to reveal the fact that jews were from the Middle Ages skilled in finances. They were known to be money lenders ( ancestors of the banking system). Hitler was plagued by the notion of the ability for jewish people to produce wealth. It is a well known fact that he ransacked jewish wealth as part of his plan to exterminate the jewish race. Add that notion to pan germanism which was a nationalistic current already promoted in the late 1800's, and you have the recipe for Hitler's main motivation to find millions who rallied to national socialism.
He knew how to exploit the readiness of german people to rid off the folks who owned international finances. He happened to rise in the political realm of Germany at the " right time".
There is not much known about Hitler's spiritual life. I am also curious as to where the term " altar boy " ( your quote) comes from.
Sabine Grant is offline  
Old 05-31-2003, 05:25 AM   #46
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: limbo
Posts: 986
Question

Quote:
Originally posted by Sabine Grant
I am suggesting that reason can produce evil. Also suggesting that a mind which cannot use rational thinking dwells on simplistic concepts. The " idiot du village" who is mostly an individual suffering of what is known as cretinism ( a genetical deffect first discovered in the Alpes) is far from being ignorant. He can be semi educated yet not be able to process information to use for analytical or deduction thought process. It is not a matter of being ignorant. It is a matter of not being able to process acquired information and apply it to daily reasoning.
How does reason produce evil? Do you have examples?

Thank you for the clarification of l'idiot du village...

Please allow me to rephrase my question, again for clarification:

Are you suggesting that an inability to reason is better than an ability to reason?
Luiseach is offline  
Old 05-31-2003, 05:43 AM   #47
Talk Freethought Staff
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 32,364
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Luiseach
How does reason produce evil? Do you have examples?

Thank you for the clarification of l'idiot du village...

Please allow me to rephrase my question, again for clarification:

Are you suggesting that an inability to reason is better than an ability to reason?
Again... I thought I had shown in my previous posts where I commented on Hitler using a rational thought process which emcompassed arguments related to history, politics, economy, genetics, philosophy etc.....as an example of how it can produce evil.
I am not suggesting that the absence of reason is better than the ability to reason. I am pointing to the fact that absence of reason does not necessarly mean evil. I am balancing both arguments.
Sabine Grant is offline  
Old 05-31-2003, 06:21 AM   #48
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: limbo
Posts: 986
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Sabine Grant
Again... I thought I had shown in my previous posts where I commented on Hitler using a rational thought process which emcompassed arguments related to history, politics, economy, genetics, philosophy etc.....as an example of how it can produce evil.
Adolf Hitler was a sociopath, though, was he not?

Quote:
I am not suggesting that the absence of reason is better than the ability to reason.
Whew!
Luiseach is offline  
Old 05-31-2003, 06:36 AM   #49
Talk Freethought Staff
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 32,364
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Luiseach
Adolf Hitler was a sociopath, though, was he not?



Whew!
I am not sure I understand where you are leading to.. do you need my personal evaluation to confirm that Hitler was a sociopath or are you testing whether or not I can recognize he was capable of manipulating his entourage and the public into believing his ideology was the best for a " Greater Germany"?
Sociopaths are extremely skilled individuals when it comes to manipulating their entourage. They use rational arguments to convince their audience.
How does the fact that Hitler would be a sociopath refute my belief that the use of a rational thought process can produce evil?
Sabine Grant is offline  
Old 05-31-2003, 06:42 AM   #50
Talk Freethought Staff
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 32,364
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Luiseach


Whew!
Am I to assume from that brief comment that you lean to believe that the absence of a rational thought process cannot be valued under any circumstances?
I will relate to you a personal experience..... I read a poem written by a Down Syndrom age 16. I found myself envying the simplicity of his mind as he could delight in the most common things. Things I have taken for granted myself. I realized that my own reason had kept me from considering enjoying those details of daily life. It is an experience I wish for you as others to live. It is quite humbling.
Sabine Grant is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:59 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.