FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

View Poll Results: Would you let billions of people suffer for the actions of two people?
Yes 7 13.73%
No 36 70.59%
I might, I might not 8 15.69%
Voters: 51. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-08-2003, 09:32 AM   #231
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LALA Land in California
Posts: 3,764
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Radorth
I work where there are about 80% atheists. Nobody rants about anything, or has a desire to. There's no problem at all. Why do you need to rant on your job anyway? Amie's example applies to you because whether you rant on the job or not, you still have the same irrational feelings toward Christians in general.

Rad
I don't feel any need to rant on the job or anywhere else but here. I'm getting so it's not even fun to vent here anymore. One of my two best friends in the world is a Catholic. I love her unconditionally. Rad, don't try to talk about what you know NOTHING about, ok? Don't try to project your feelings for atheists on me and twist it around.

Thank you,
Kally

80% atheists at a place here in LA, WOW.
Mad Kally is offline  
Old 02-08-2003, 09:33 AM   #232
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Ill
Posts: 6,577
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Amie
Helen: I think Beyelzu and Kally are very wise to avoid relationships with people who have religious beliefs. If you read SL&S you can see how this complicates relationships.

I think it can be limiting...
Well, yes, it limits atheists to atheist partners - but based on what those particular two atheists said, I think it seems like a very wise choice for the two of them.

That's not meant as a criticism of people who choose differently. I said I thought it was wise for them because of what they - in particular - said about theists or the idea of a theist partner, in their posts.

More generally, I'd say anyone who makes a choice to avoid what they know would drive them crazy is wise. It means they know where their own limits are.

take care
Helen
HelenM is offline  
Old 02-08-2003, 09:35 AM   #233
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 1,626
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Radorth
In Further Along the Road less Traveled M. Scott Peck remarked about how many atheists walked out of his office seeking or believing in God, and how many "pshychotic" Christians left in doubt. It's called "mental health" and it works both ways.
Hi Rad
I have read The road less travelled but not this one. I'll have to check it out
My friend Heather is a psychiatrist and she tells me the same thing, many non believers seek, many Christians will doubt...
Amie is offline  
Old 02-08-2003, 09:36 AM   #234
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LALA Land in California
Posts: 3,764
Default

Quote:
Amie:
I think it can be limiting...
Limiting what? Oh Lawdy, Amie knows a psychiatrist! THey are ALL the same I suppose.

What are all the nonbelievers seeking? I really and truly miss Santa Claus. I'll leave you alone now, Maybe you can think about something to bicker about among yourselves. Like which of you is a REAL xian.
Mad Kally is offline  
Old 02-08-2003, 09:43 AM   #235
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 1,626
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by HelenM
Well, yes, it limits atheists to atheist partners - but based on what those particular two atheists said, I think it seems like a very wise choice for the two of them.
and then you went on to say how it complicates relationships...
It can only complicate a relationship if one lets it.
Quote:
More generally, I'd say anyone who makes a choice to avoid what they know would drive them crazy is wise. It means they know where their own limits are.
I would agree it is generally good to stay away from what drives people nuts but if other people are driving one nuts based simply on the fact that they believe in God then thats the particular atheist's problem. Non believers are everywhere. If an atheist wants to surround themself with only fellow atheists thats their choice, perhaps they should go start their own colony in some far away land.
Amie is offline  
Old 02-08-2003, 09:44 AM   #236
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Ill
Posts: 6,577
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Amie
Hi Rad
I have read The road less travelled but not this one. I'll have to check it out
My friend Heather is a psychiatrist and she tells me the same thing, many non believers seek, many Christians will doubt...
He's written quite a few books. I quite like a lot of what he says. I remember his 4 stages of spiritual growth schematic and his comment that many non-Christians are more spiritually mature than many Christians

(That's in The Road Less Traveled And Beyond)

M Scott Peck has gotten more open about claiming to be a Christian and using Christian language over the years, it seems, but he's definitely at the liberal end of the Christian spectrum, as I recall. I think he thinks all religions are ways to God. That means that he probably wouldn't be considered a True Christian by many conservative Christians.

Helen
HelenM is offline  
Old 02-08-2003, 09:46 AM   #237
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LALA Land in California
Posts: 3,764
Default

Quote:
If an atheist wants to surround themself with only fellow atheists thats their choice, perhaps they should go start their own colony in some far away land.
Hey Amie, you sound just like Dumbya's daddy.

Have fun...
Mad Kally is offline  
Old 02-08-2003, 09:48 AM   #238
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 1,626
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Mad Kally
Limiting what?
I think its fairly obvious. Limiting the potential to have wonderful loving people in ones life based on the fact they hold a God belief. I would say the same thing to a Christian refusing to allow atheists in their lives, they are limiting themself.
Quote:
What are all the nonbelievers seeking?
God. You don't but many do, such is life...
Quote:
Maybe you can think about something to bicker about among yourselves. Like which of you is a REAL xian.
Grow up!
Amie is offline  
Old 02-08-2003, 09:51 AM   #239
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Ill
Posts: 6,577
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Amie
HelenM: Well, yes, it limits atheists to atheist partners - but based on what those particular two atheists said, I think it seems like a very wise choice for the two of them.


and then you went on to say how it complicates relationships...
It can only complicate a relationship if one lets it.
Well, I wouldn't quite agree with that way of saying it. I'd say every difference between partners, including a religious one, does complicate the relationship. The choice each person makes is whether to take on the challenge of that complication and determine to resolve it, or to avoid it in the first place. I think both choices are acceptable but I still wouldn't push people to take on that particular challenge. If they want to that's up to them.

Quote:
Helen: More generally, I'd say anyone who makes a choice to avoid what they know would drive them crazy is wise. It means they know where their own limits are.

I would agree it is generally good to stay away from what drives people nuts but if other people are driving one nuts based simply on the fact that they believe in God then thats the particular atheist's problem. Non believers are everywhere. If an atheist wants to surround themself with only fellow atheists thats their choice, perhaps they should go start their own colony in some far away land.
But, I think there's a big difference between living around people with different beliefs (or lack thereof) as compared with deciding to be open to a close relationship with one.

I was talking about close intimate relationships - the kind that lead to marriage if the partners believe in marriage and/or it's possible.

I thought everyone was talking about that.

No offense Amie - but I can't, knowing what I know, encourage anyone into a mixed belief relationship. If they are in one that they are going to stay in, I would do my best to help them deal with the difference in beliefs, in so far as I could help.

Helen
HelenM is offline  
Old 02-08-2003, 09:55 AM   #240
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 5,393
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Radorth
How about if he...[several scenarios, some with violent solutions, and all that limit potency, benevolence, and/or the knowledge of the god follow] Do tell us how this omnipotent God, as YOU envision one, would operate.
Nothing like the manner you propose if he is also all-loving and all-knowing. Each of the scenarios you propose limit the god's omnipotence, omnibenevolence, and/or his omniscience. The god of Christianity has none of these limits and could operate his omnipotence in a manner that does not violate his will. If he cannot, then he is not omnipotent, omnibenevolent, and/or omniscient.

Quote:
Sorry bub, but the only rational alternatives are allowing free will or making robots. We are reassured of this fact each time we read one of the goofy, contradictory theories skeptics propose when forced to think about their beliefs. We await yours.
If someone is limited to just these two alternatives when there are other possibilities, then that someone is not omnipotent. Insisting that an all-powerful creature is limited in this way contradicts it's omnipotence.

Quote:
You accuse him of too much violence, against what he calls evil, one day and fault him for it the next.:banghead:
Atheists don't believe that there are gods, so we can't and don't accuse or fault them for anything.

Rick
Dr Rick is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:08 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.